By Dianam Peresuo Dakolo
Among citizens with undying commitment to peaceful coexistence, social harmony and cohesion, political correctness is something of a religion: words or actions with the slightest tinge of antipathy or antagonism are anathema, to be avoided at all costs, so the polity is free of threat(s) to its stability. Desirable as such a predisposition could be, citizens need to appreciate that cost-benefit analysis is a key principle for any type of enterprise. Some illustration of how hurtful political correctness could be to a society should not be out of place here.
*Jonathan, Obasanjo, BuhariThe human and material resources that have been consumed by the insurgency in the North East are incalculable. Brilliant and courageous military officers and others of the rank and file have all perished and continue to be wasted till date; a hundred plus schoolgirls from Chibok have yet to be recovered from the world's deadliest death cult known as Boko Haram, and, of course, the hundreds of billions of naira that have gone into counter-insurgency operations translate into humongous opportunity cost for the country. Now, do Nigerians not know those behind Boko Haram? Naming names and demanding decisive action on the part of the authorities goes against the grain where political correctness is something of an ethos.