The current agitation for the unconditional release of the director of Radio Biafra, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, and the resuscitation of the Biafra nation became more intense after Kanu was arrested during his visit to
Because I recently wrote about Nnamdi Kanu and the Biafra dream, I would not have liked to be dragged into the issue of Biafra any longer. But after listening to my colleague Emma Agu addressing the Biafra issue on YouTube, I was obviously disturbed. Mr Agu and I worked in the defunct Nigerian Statesman newspaper in the early 1980s and I know that he is a respected veteran journalist.
I was disturbed because I know that the
Indeed there was.
The Nigeria-Biafra war ended about 45 years ago. And if you take a cursory look at what is happening, you will find that the people demonstrating in
Some of these people who were born in
Soon after the war, General Yakubu Gowon introduced his ‘3Rs’ – an acronym for reintegration, rehabilitation and reconstruction. It was his vision of implementing his National Development Plan [NDP], following his “no victor, no vanquished” declaration at the end of the war.
It is 45 years since. Yet, most Igbo who were either born in Biafra or fought on the side of
Even as we speak, fresh agitations are being drummed up every day. The system only succeeded in breeding ethnic militia of sorts all over the country who claim, rightly or wrongly, to be the local champions of ethnic interests.
In the
Those who managed Gowon’s “3Rs” policy for reintegration, rehabilitation and reconstruction were the ones who made the initial mistake. They did not look into the fact that those children born during the three and half years of war were babies with Biafran birth certificates. Now they are adults, and as far as they are concerned,
Growing up in
If you ask me though, I think the position of the Igbo in the entire Nigerian experiment is very straight forward. Either they are truly One Nigeria or they are not. And if they are not, they should be allowed to go. That is it.
*Kanu
For the Igbo, being truly One Nigeria implies that ethnic chauvinism has to be expunged from the national dictionary. It means that any Nigerian child born in any part ofNigeria has legitimacy of
citizenship of his or her place of birth. It means that any citizen of Nigeria can live, work and help develop any
village, town or city in Nigeria
where he feels comfortable to live in, without being constantly reminded by
those who claim to own the land that he is a foreigner in his own country.
But whether the Igbo are coming or going, there are fundamental issues to be addressed.
First and perhaps most importantly is the fact that although the Igbo are the ones now being hounded for agitating for the actualization of the Biafra nation, they are also the ones for whom the unity ofNigeria
means so much. They are the ones who have made the most enormous sacrifices to
keep Nigeria
together. They are the ones who have invested their money and skills in the
development of Nigerian villages, towns and cities other than their own. These
facts are incontrovertible.
Secondly, it is obvious that the creation of Biafra can never be a solution to the problems of Ndigbo inNigeria . At
best, it will become their challenge.
There is simply no reason for anyone to convince himself that once Biafra is carved out fromNigeria , all the problems of the
Igbo will vanish. Not by any stretch of the imagination!
We Igbo still have a long way to go. The Igbo of today are so far in quality from the Igbo before the Nigeria-Biafra war. Before the civil war, an Igbo was his brother’s keeper. Since the end of the war, an Igbo has become his brother’s betrayer. Before the civil war, the Igbo were united and spoke with one voice. Today, they can no longer speak with one voice. Even in the face of the current agitations forBiafra ,
the Igbo are not speaking with one voice.
The leadership of Igbo in those days which consisted of Igbo elders was known and unanimously recognised and no one argued about the hierarchy. Today, leaderships of sorts have sprung up from every nook and cranny of Igboland. Everybody wants to be seen as an Igbo leader. The Igbo are still dancing the discordant tune of “each man for himself, God for us all!” The Igbo of today will be ready to betray each other because of money. Only a generation ago, it was unheard of. It was taboo.
It is important to note that the Igbo were highly regarded by most of the other Nigerians before the Nigeria-Biafra war. Despite the negative impression of being domineering, which some Northern leaders had about them, most Nigerians trusted them. If an Igbo told another Nigerian “this is black or white”, and that Nigerian turned it over and over, it couldn’t be different.The fact that they were trusted by the other Nigerians made the Igbo proud of themselves. It was that pride that bestowed on them their unflinching sense of unity.
However, somehow, the Igbo fell short of expectation during the war. The story was that an Igbo who pretended to be dead would jump to his feet at the sudden clatter of coins. To other Nigerians, that meant that the Igbo loved money even more than their lives. Once it had become generally touted and people believed that Ndigbo are greedily uncompromising with their love for money, political manipulators took advantage of their “weakness” to deal them a devastating and sustained blow from which they have never recovered.
Nigerian leaders tried to settle the Igbo by giving them the opportunity of becoming the Senate President. It was hoped that from that legislative angle, they would be able to effect the necessary changes that would keepNigeria
firmly united and bring the Igbo back on their feet. But they bungled those
opportunities.
Soon after a democratically elected fourth Republic was inaugurated, Evan Enwerem, an Igbo who hailed fromImo State
became the first Senate President. He did not hold the post for long. A Senate
committee investigated him for fraud, part of the allegation being that he
falsified his name. He was removed from office on 18 November, 1999.
The next President was Dr Chuba Okadigbo, another Igbo fromAnambra
State . Okadigbo was
relieved of that office in less than one year, on 8 August, 2000. He was
accused of fraud and misappropriation of funds.
He was succeeded by Pius Anyim, yet another Igbo fromEbonyi State . Anyim presided over the Senate
for close to three years, from 2000 to 2003.
In 2003, another Igbo fromAbia State ,
Adolphus Wabara, took over. Wabara was there for two years from 2003 to 2005
and gave way to Ken Nnamani, yet another Igbo from Enugu State .
Nnamani presided for two years from 2005 to 2007 when the Presidency went outside Igboland, to the Middle Belt.
David Mark was elected Senate President on 6 June 2007. He completed his tenure of four years and was re-elected in April 2011 for another four-year term.
The Igbo had to make do with second positions as Deputy Senate President and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives because they could not hold their ground.
All this shows that Ndigbo need to look themselves up inwardly. They need to address their own peculiar problems. They need to ask themselves pertinent questions. They must recognize that they are so important in the economic stability of the country for Nigerians to want to lose them.
So, if the agitation of these youths is for the release of Nnamdi Kanu alone, it would make sense. But agitating for the return ofBiafra cannot solve any Igbo problem – not
now, not in the foreseeable future.
For one reason, those agitating forBiafra have not done any feasibility studies on their
demands. If there was a land called Biafra ,
where is it now? From where to where? Who and who are agreed on that? What is
the political thrust of the Biafra nation?
Where are the institutions and infrastructure? These and many similar questions
need to be settled for any agitation to have real meaning.
In summary, all these developments are enough to point to any discerning mind that the creation or recreation of Biafra is not, and will never be, the solution to Igbo problems inNigeria . As I have said before, the
release of Nnamdi Kanu is the first step. And afterwards, the Federal
Government should dialogue with the leaders of the Biafra Movement and put
matters clearly to them. They just have to manage themselves within a united Nigeria . In
fact what Nigerians should be more concerned about at this point in time is how
to cripple Abuja economically and strengthen the
seven zones of Nigeria .
For the Igbo, being truly One Nigeria implies that ethnic chauvinism has to be expunged from the national dictionary. It means that any Nigerian child born in any part of
But whether the Igbo are coming or going, there are fundamental issues to be addressed.
First and perhaps most importantly is the fact that although the Igbo are the ones now being hounded for agitating for the actualization of the Biafra nation, they are also the ones for whom the unity of
Secondly, it is obvious that the creation of Biafra can never be a solution to the problems of Ndigbo in
There is simply no reason for anyone to convince himself that once Biafra is carved out from
We Igbo still have a long way to go. The Igbo of today are so far in quality from the Igbo before the Nigeria-Biafra war. Before the civil war, an Igbo was his brother’s keeper. Since the end of the war, an Igbo has become his brother’s betrayer. Before the civil war, the Igbo were united and spoke with one voice. Today, they can no longer speak with one voice. Even in the face of the current agitations for
The leadership of Igbo in those days which consisted of Igbo elders was known and unanimously recognised and no one argued about the hierarchy. Today, leaderships of sorts have sprung up from every nook and cranny of Igboland. Everybody wants to be seen as an Igbo leader. The Igbo are still dancing the discordant tune of “each man for himself, God for us all!” The Igbo of today will be ready to betray each other because of money. Only a generation ago, it was unheard of. It was taboo.
It is important to note that the Igbo were highly regarded by most of the other Nigerians before the Nigeria-Biafra war. Despite the negative impression of being domineering, which some Northern leaders had about them, most Nigerians trusted them. If an Igbo told another Nigerian “this is black or white”, and that Nigerian turned it over and over, it couldn’t be different.The fact that they were trusted by the other Nigerians made the Igbo proud of themselves. It was that pride that bestowed on them their unflinching sense of unity.
However, somehow, the Igbo fell short of expectation during the war. The story was that an Igbo who pretended to be dead would jump to his feet at the sudden clatter of coins. To other Nigerians, that meant that the Igbo loved money even more than their lives. Once it had become generally touted and people believed that Ndigbo are greedily uncompromising with their love for money, political manipulators took advantage of their “weakness” to deal them a devastating and sustained blow from which they have never recovered.
Nigerian leaders tried to settle the Igbo by giving them the opportunity of becoming the Senate President. It was hoped that from that legislative angle, they would be able to effect the necessary changes that would keep
Soon after a democratically elected fourth Republic was inaugurated, Evan Enwerem, an Igbo who hailed from
The next President was Dr Chuba Okadigbo, another Igbo from
He was succeeded by Pius Anyim, yet another Igbo from
In 2003, another Igbo from
Nnamani presided for two years from 2005 to 2007 when the Presidency went outside Igboland, to the Middle Belt.
David Mark was elected Senate President on 6 June 2007. He completed his tenure of four years and was re-elected in April 2011 for another four-year term.
The Igbo had to make do with second positions as Deputy Senate President and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives because they could not hold their ground.
All this shows that Ndigbo need to look themselves up inwardly. They need to address their own peculiar problems. They need to ask themselves pertinent questions. They must recognize that they are so important in the economic stability of the country for Nigerians to want to lose them.
So, if the agitation of these youths is for the release of Nnamdi Kanu alone, it would make sense. But agitating for the return of
For one reason, those agitating for
In summary, all these developments are enough to point to any discerning mind that the creation or recreation of Biafra is not, and will never be, the solution to Igbo problems in
Biafra is a solution for Umuigbo, not for Nigeria. There is a geographical boundaries, language, culture and way of life. To assert that Igbo's can't work together is absolute nonsense. Once we know that the United Nation will recognize Biafra as a sovereign Nation, all that distrust will be history. There is no better group in the amalgamated country called Nigeria than Igbo speaking people. If we can build up Nigeria, imagine what we can do with our own nation. And, if Nigeria wants to survive, Biafra must be freed from the British/Nigeria/Hausa/Yoruba connection. The solution for the Igbo Speaking people trapped in Nigeria is on the Igbo speaking people. However, not to worry, Biafra will revive and the restoration of a nation will be reborn.
ReplyDeleteThe youth who were not born during the war are now grown men and strong women. To assume that because they were born during the war, they are incapable of conducting the business of a Nation is simply not the case. In fact, they are more technologically savvy today than their forefathers and if there must be a conflict, situations and results will not be remotely similar. The youth of Biafra are at this point raising the conscious of the rest of the country Nigeria, How to restore the nation is simple especially when compared to other nations who have restored their nation from the grips of British/Hausa colonialism. Nnamdi Kanu must be released NOW. Any harm done to him or any Nwaigbo are being noted and will do no more than escalate the Nigerian dilemma.
It will be well with Biafra