By Chidi Odinkalu
“Because judges are part of
government, acting on our behalf, we are entitled to require them to abandon
their priesthood and to present their activities for assessment by
laymen.” David
Pannick, KC, Judges, p. 17 (1987)
The
Guardian’s obituary
on Bernard Levin, the celebrated Times
columnist who died in 2004 after a long battle with Alzheimer’s disease,
described him as “a passionate and eclectic journalist with a legendary
capacity for work, whose career made him a host of friends – and enemies.”
Among these enemies, few were as determined as the legal profession.
David Pannick, KC, recalls that
Mr. Levin’s settled view was that “the legal profession had an infinite
capacity for deluding itself.” He had good reason. When Rayner Goddard retired
as Lord Chief Justice in 1958, Bernard Levin’s evisceration of his judicial
record inspired “a clandestine meeting at which the higher judiciary considered
whether the uppity columnist might be done for criminal libel.” The idea was
eventually dropped.