When I look at Ghana today, many questions come to
my mind. The biggest question I find is that in a country so rich and blessed
with so much natural resources, why is Ghana
ranked among the poorest countries in Africa?
Why are Ghanaians still wallowing in abject poverty while tourists flock in our
country on a daily basis to view of the beauty of our natural resources? Why do
we have foreign investors making lots of money and take the money to enrich
their countries? These same investors employ our citizens and subject them to
hard labour under poor working conditions and yet underpay them.
I have come to understand that CORRUPTION is the
cause of all this tragedy. Corruption is something that we talk about, it is
something that we complain about, it is something whose negative impact we
recognise, it is something that even the corrupt acknowledge is a bad thing.
But the tragedy is that those involved in it love it and those who are not
involved in it accommodate it. Our level of tolerance for corruption in Ghana is
amazing.
It seems to be in the nature of Ghanaians to jail small thieves and elect the great ones into public office. Today the richest men and women are those who occupy public office. Our politicians will not rest until they have houses in which they will never live in. They have vehicles which they will never drive. They have beds of gold which they will never sleep in because they have no sleep anyway. They buy food which they will never eat because they long lost the appetite.
We the Igbo
Ekunie Initiative, IEI, comprised of individuals in Nigeria and the
Diaspora; for the umpteenth time unequivocally condemn the heinous, barbaric
and shameful massacre once again of peaceful pro-Biafra protesters who were
holding prayers in a school premises in Aba by agents of Nigeria’s infamous
army and police force. Such cowardly killing of unarmed protesters exercising
their fundamental rights to peaceful protests only goes to confirm the globally
acclaimed notoriety of Nigeria’s
disoriented security services that more often than not, turn their guns on the
hapless and defenceless citizens they are trained and paid to protect.
That the Nigerian army and police that have not
acquitted itself in the fight against Boko Haram and other security challenges
will always so callously murder unarmed civilians under the watch and orders of
President Buhari only validates the widely held notion that Nigeria has
finally returned to full blown dictatorship and tyranny. Consequently, the
nation is once again facing human rights violations, repression and tyranny at
a scale that far supersedes what obtained under erstwhile military dictators.
No nation whose security services murders unarmed innocent civilians who are
engaged in peaceful protests and free expression both of which constitute some
of the most basic attributes of democracy can still call itself by any
definition a democracy.
We note that while Buhari campaigned on change;
his idea of change has turned out to mean repression, extra judicial
detentions, mass killing of unarmed civilians and other human rights abuses
that characterise the dark past Nigerians laboured to escape from. It is even
more shameful that while Buhari in the course of addressing the 26th AU summit
in Addis Ababa urged “African nations to put down their guns and stop spending
scarce resources killing our children and inflicting unspeakable horrors and
unimaginable hardship on our brothers and sisters,” yet, under his watch,
Nigeria has become a killing field where the guns are blazing, the army and
police are killing peaceful protesters and inflicting the same unspeakable
horrors and unimaginable hardship on fellow citizens that he condemned in his
AU speech.
We submit that a president who has no inclination
for peace or dialogue and who since inception of his administration has been
busy widening the theatres of conflict with killings and extra judicial
detentions goes abroad to preach peace only, in the vain hope of impressing and
deceiving a global audience. But the world is wiser and the mounting human
rights violations of the administration are increasingly subject to
international scrutiny. We therefore, use this opportunity to again call on the
International community; the United Nations, Human rights watch, AU, Amnesty
international, the European Union, the US state department and others to take
note of Buhari’s increasing human rights violations and decimation of
democratic rights and principles. We warn that the constant killing of unarmed
pro-Biafra protesters in cold blood is a recipe for disaster that could at some
point force the Biafra groups to legitimately seek self defence and thus
conflict/insurgency for which president Buhari, the COAS Tukur Buratai, the IGP
Solomon Arase, the police commissioners and army commanders of respective units
where such killings have taken place should be held responsible.
While we continue to pursue the indictment of all
those implicated in such heinous crimes against humanity within International
statutes, we urge governors of the respective states, the national assembly and
state assembly members to uphold the tenets of democracy and speak out against
tyranny and the egregious violation of the fundamental rights of their
constituents by the army and police.
Signed: Maazi Tochukwu Ezeoke President Igbo Ekunie Initiative Twitter: @MaaziEzeoke +44 7748612933 Mr Lawrence Nwobu Secretary Igbo Ekunie Initiative
We live in a hyper-partisan
time, in which the desire to score political points and spruce up the record of
one’s political camp has replaced responsible citizenship. We concede that
misinformation, distortion, overzealousness, and exuberance grow naturally from
excessive partisanship. Even so, the current situation in Nigeria is
uniquely depressing. Truth has taken flight, replaced by propaganda, lies, and
exaggerations.
*Buhari
Propaganda has become the
political currency of the time, traded, exchanged, and valued by partisans on
both sides of the political divide. And the biggest culprits at this time are
Buharists. This is ironic because President Muhammadu Buhari, the man whom the
Buharists adore and are eager to present in good light, has a reputation for
truth telling, candor, and self-effacing bluntness.
During the last government, former
President Goodluck Jonathan's supporters were given to exaggerations of his
successes — if they can be called that. They were also notorious for
downplaying or refusing even in the face of evidence to acknowledge his
failures.
It was under that government
that the Chibok kidnapping and other tragic failures were shamelessly denied or
trivialized while routine government businesses were promoted to acts of
elevated statecraft, of transformative success.
In truth, the Jonathanians were
sometimes responding to the taunts of critics, mostly supporters of the APC,
who would not acknowledge any achievements of that government and were eager to
exaggerate its failures. Even in the domain of terrorism where people were
dying, many of the former president’s detractors sounded like cheerleaders for
Boko Haram, while the Jonathanians, who trafficked denials and willful
ignorance, sounded like mean-spirited people who did not care about human life.
To compound matters, the
Jonathanians were embellishing or outright fabricating achievements to make
their hero appear more competent that he actually was.
Unfortunately, we are seeing
the same with Buharists.
I was raped by a
supposed friend (someone I thought I could trust). Left in shame and shock I
could not tell anyone about my ordeal. I kept it to myself and went about my
normal life.
Some weeks later after I came back from an event, I
started feeling weak, so I went to a nearby hospital and ran some tests. To my
greatest shock I tested positive to pregnancy.
I told the man involved who after much plea
convinced me to have an abortion which would be kept a secret.
I went in for an abortion. However, before the
procedure, I asked God to forgive me for what I was about to do. In the
process of the abortion, I died. I then saw myself leave my body. Still looking at the lifeless
form on the abortion table, I started ascending but in a flash a force pulled
me down through a dark tunnel. I could not see the beginning or the end of the
walls of the tunnel. It was dark, so dark, I saw cobweb like cells on the walls
and in an instant I was in HELL.
I saw a woman who had been there for over a hundred
years; she was in deep pain and agony, she would melt in the flames and the
magma like liquid would come back together in the form of the woman. It occurred
repeatedly. I knew I was in hell.
By Ikechukwu Amaechi Attahiru Jega,
a professor of political science and immediate past chairman of the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC), is a very lucky Nigerian. He is one of
those fluky human beings the Scripture tells us are blessed because their sins
are covered. He remains the only INEC chairman to “successfully” organise two
national elections – in 2011 and 2015.
*Jega,Osinbajo and Buhari
For a job that
has become the nemesis of most otherwise solid reputations, Jega left office
with his intact. Today, he is hailed in some quarters as the best thing that
has happened to Nigeria’s democracy since 1999. He left office
on June 30, 2015 to return to his lecturing job at Bayero University, Kano,
where he was vice chancellor before his appointment in June 2010 by former
President Goodluck Jonathan.
That was after
he had disclosed in March that he would not accept tenure renewal. Had he
wanted, perhaps, he would still be INEC chairman today. Shortly after
leaving office, Jega, former national president of the Academic Staff Union of
Universities (ASUU), won the 2015 edition of the Charles T. Mannat Democracy
Award.
It was
presented to him by the United States-based International Foundation for
Electoral Systems (IFES), administrators of the award, at an elaborate ceremony
in Washington D.C. on September 29, 2015. Every year,
IFES, a pro-democracy organisation that advocates improved electoral systems
around the world, recognises the accomplishments of individuals in advancing
freedom and democracy by bestowing awards on them in honour of past chairs of
its board of directors: Charles T. Manatt and Patricia Hutar, and Senior
Adviser, Joe C. Baxter.
While Jega was
honoured under the Charles T. Manatt Democracy Award category, it is
instructive that his co-awardees were U.S. Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi, and
Republican Congressman, Ed Royce. Jega was chosen
as the international figure for the award, according to the promoters, for
leading the INEC to conduct what they perceived as one of the most credible
elections in Nigeria’s history, even in the face of alleged intimidation and
sabotage by some of his own staff and officials of the Jonathan administration.
...Buhari’s Unnecessary
Trips The Bleeding Economy”
Ekiti State
Governor, Mr Ayodele Fayose has counselled President Muhammadu Buhari to stay
at home and govern the country instead of junketing from one country to the
other, saying; “foreign countries won’t
solve our problems for us and the President’s incessant foreign trips is
already bleeding the economy with about $1 million being spent per trip.”
The governor, who
said most of the trips embarked on by the President were unnecessary, added
that ministers or at best the Vice President could have been made to attend
most of the functions being attended abroad by the President.
According to a
statement issued in Ado-Ekiti by his Special Assistant on Public Communications
and New Media, Lere Olayinka, Governor Fayose said that “the President should
rather listen more to those of us who criticise him instead of those hailing
every of his wrong steps either because of what they intend to gain or for fear
of persecution.”
The statement read;
“Conservatively, about $1 million goes into every of the foreign trips and the
way the President is going, foreign trips alone might gulp 20 percent of the
Federal Government budget and that will be disastrous for the dwindling economy
of the country.
By Levi
Obijiofor Bola Tinubu,
the national leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the governing party
at the federal level, has cast himself as the chief defender of President
Muhammadu Buhari. His exaggerated defence of Buhari’s economic and political
policies should be expected. After all, he was the one who threw his weight
behind Buhari as the presidential flag bearer of the APC during the general
elections last year.
Answering
questions that focused on the state of the economy, the falling oil price in
the international market, and the government’s options for dealing with the
ragged economic situation at home, Tinubu offered simplistic excuses why
Nigerians should not be nervous about the instability in the oil market which
has also affected global currencies. He said: “We are not the only country
affected, it is universal. We have to manage ourselves, challenge ourselves,
and be more creative in a way that will not affect the welfare of the people,
because the government is about the people.” He also said: “We should also be
innovative and develop our economy in such a way that will show the leadership
position that we always espouse in Africa. Now
and years back we have been talking about diversification of the oil sector but
we never implemented it.”
The idea that
the significantly reduced oil price should be regarded as a worldwide problem
might be true but should the country go into lockdown just because the global
economy is experiencing turbulence? If the problem is worldwide, shouldn’t the
government have its own emergency response strategies? Should we fold arms,
suspend our lives, and wait for the situation in other parts of the world to
abate before we can start to live again?
The hallmark
of good political leaders is the ability to respond instantly to unanticipated
problems that confront their nations. I do not subscribe to Tinubu’s rallying
call for all citizens to support President Muhammadu Buhari because there is no
evidence that the government is taking strong action to mitigate the nation’s
economic problems.
It is okay for
a party leader such as Tinubu to aim to rouse the citizens to support their
government in times of economic adversity. However, before that can happen, the
government has to demonstrate practically to the citizens that it is working
hard to alleviate poverty, economic hardships, health problems, and other
problems that have overwhelmed the people. In times of growing economic
problems, speechifying is not the best way to appeal to and win the support of
citizens. The government has to show with verifiable facts that it is working
tirelessly to attend to national problems.
The object of this second half of my article is to
challenge Nigeria and
Nigerians: Please make an honest effort at determining the truth of Nigeria’s
contemporary history! It is the sure way of exorcising the demons needlessly
thwarting every chance of Nigeria
attaining nationhood. If Nigeria
refuses to confront the truth of its history, it will continue to tug at
centrifugal forces guaranteed to eternally forestall any contingency of
mastering the contradictions that dog every centimetre of the country’s path.
*Reuben Abati
The 50th anniversary of the January 1966 coup d’etat
afforded the country a golden opportunity to turn its back permanently against
historical lies, especially lies of the variety that inflame passions and
further entrench the existing divisions between the disparate peoples forged
into one country by the sleight of British colonialism. Unfortunately, revisionists
seized the public space, retold falsehoods previously discredited and, thus,
blew the opportunity.
Reuben Abati is one such revisionist. In the first
half of this article, we exposed his lies in an article he entitled Armed
Forces Day: January 15, Remembering Where We Came From. Abati had
claimed in that article that “An Igbo man, Nwafor Orizu, the acting President,
handed over power to another Igbo man, General Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi.” We proved
that this was blatantly untrue. He had also downplayed Aguiyi-Ironsi’s central
role in putting down the coup, for which we pointed out that he was being
disingenuous.
There are two other distortions in Abati’s article
that must be discredited. He wrote that (1) Aguiyi-Ironsi treated the January
coup plotters with kid gloves, and (2) Aguiyi-Ironsi imposed Igbo hegemony on Nigeria.
Whether in scholarship or in journalism, whoever made claims such as these,
would be expected to deploy empirical evidence in support of his assertions.
But not Abati. We must dismantle his fabrications, of course. Before doing
that, however, some background information is imperative. Fifteen years ago,
Abati wrote a two-part article entitled Obasanjo,
Secession And The Secessionists (The Guardian on Sunday, December 16
and 23, 2001).
That article contained all the lies that he
regurgitated in his latest piece. It elicited a lot of reaction from
observers of the Nigerian condition who believed that Abati should know
better, and should wield his pen with some circumspection. We will return to
this. Let’s first reexamine the facts. Abati said that Nzeogwu and his cohorts
were treated with kid gloves? In Nzeogwu: An Intimate Portrait Of Major
Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu (Spectrum Books, Ibadan 1987) Olusegun
Obasanjo reproduced copies of handwritten letters from his friend, Nzeogwu,
which detailed the ill-treatment they suffered in detention. But far more important
is the fact that Aguiyi-Ironsi’s Supreme Military Council (SMC) took a
decision to subject the coup plotters to public trial.
By Oguwike Nwachuku This year’s activities leading to the 50th anniversary of the
January 15, 1966 coup plot believed to have altered the political equation of Nigeria
after just six years of independence have come and gone.
*Nzeogwu
But the lessons,
like a razor will continue to pierce the heart of every discerning person.
Popularly and
erroneously described as Nzeogwu Coup, nay Igbo coup, many commentators have
interpreted that putsch the way it suits them, their political allies and
interest, 50 years down the road.
The same scenario is
playing out in the trial of the spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party
(PDP), Olisa Metuh, whose own case is being given another colouration.
Of all the persons
accused of eating the yam from Sambo Dasuki’s office as former national
security adviser (NSA), Metuh is the only one that has been brought to court in
handcuffs and Black Maria and whose bail conditions are ridiculous.
Today’s intervention is not on Metuh, but I think the Igbo are also using their tongue to count their teeth.
This is what Nzeogwu told his compatriots while announcing reasons for the coup: “Our enemies are the political profiteers, the swindlers, the men in high and low places that seek bribes and demand 10 per cent; those that keep the country divided permanently so that they can remain in office as ministers or VIPs at least, the tribalists, the nepotists, those that make the country look big for nothing before international circles, those that have corrupted our society and put the Nigerian calendar back by their words and deeds.
“Like good soldiers we are not promising anything miraculous or spectacular.
“But what we do promise every law abiding citizen is freedom from fear and all forms of oppression, freedom from general inefficiency and freedom to live and strive in every field of human endeavour, both nationally and internationally.
“We promise that you will no more be ashamed to say that you are a Nigerian ….”
By Oraye St. Franklyn I'm usually taken aback
whenever officers of the present All Progressives Congress (APC) administration
release statements and interviews to sermonise Nigerians on how Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP) administration had destroyed Nigeria for 16 years and how they
are working on fixing the mess created by PDP.
*Saraki
It is non-contestable that
between May 29, 1999 and May 29, 2015, “PDP" (in quote) occupied the seat
of power in Abuja
and controlled majority states of the
federation. However, we have to get our fact right with respect to who actually destroyed Nigeria
between 1999 and 2015. I believe we should do a holistic analysis on
this subject.
President And Vice President: 1999-2015
Nigeria
had three presidents between May 29, 1999 and May 29, 2015, namely, Chief
Olusegun Obasanjo, Late Malam Umaru Yar'adua and Dr Goodluck Jonathan. Of the
three, Obasanjo spent eight years in office (1999-2007), Yar'adua three years
(May 2007-May 2010) and Dr Jonathan five years (May 2010-May 2015). Obasanjo who
spent the longest period as president (Eight years) has since denounced the PDP
to become the APC and Buhari's “navigator” to office. Similarly, of the three
vice presidents during the period under review, Atiku Abubakar spent the most
number of years in office (Eight, 1999-2007). But he not only moved to AC/APC
while in office in 2006, he also aspired to rule Nigeria on the APC platform in 2014
and is today a member of APC's Board of Trustees.
Reuben Abati earned a PhD in Dramatic Arts over two
decades ago. He was chairman of the Editorial Board of The Guardian for nine
solid years. And he was spokesman for President Goodluck Jonathan for another
four years. In terms of education and exposure, therefore, he ranks with the
best, not just in Africa, but globally. Yet,
in Armed Forces Day: January 15, 2016, Remembering
Where We Came From, an article recently published extensively in both the
orthodox and social media, he made many false and unwarranted statements,
only two of which must be debunked in the space available here.
*General Aguiyi-Ironsi
Abati claimed that in January 1966, “An Igbo man,
Nwafor Orizu, the acting President, handed over power to another Igbo man, General
Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi.” He also claimed that, Ironsi “had been instrumental to
making the coup fail.”
Kaneng Daze, the daughter of Lieutenant Colonel James
Yakubu Pam, a victim of the January 15, 1966 coup, granted an interview, which The
Punch published in its edition of January 17, 2016 and which is also
circulating in the social media. At the time of the coup, Mrs. Daze was only
eight years old.
The following is a part of what she recalled: “So, my father
dressed up and got out of the room and started following them (the coup makers)
down the stairs. Before then, he made some few calls while he was with our mother…
The first was to (Brigadier Zakariya) Maimalari… I think it was that call that
alerted Maimalari that made him to escape. The second call was to General
(Aguiyi) Ironsi. Ironsi appeared not to have shown any surprise as he kept
saying, ‘I see! I see!! Okay!!!’ He dropped the phone and went down the first
stairs.”
*Gen Gowon
Dr. Abati and Mrs. Daze represent two broad types that
straddle Nigeria’s
contemporary history. Abati is of the class of Nigerians fully knowledgeable
about the minutest details of Nigeria’s
history but are crippled by a curious inability to live the truth. Mrs. Daze
belongs to the class unwilling or unable to reach beyond fairy tales and
determine for themselves the truths of their country’s stories.
Until
now, I didn’t believe any representative of the Nigerian government would raise
their voice during a conversation with parents of the missing Chibok
schoolgirls. Government exists to protect life and property, and, where it fails
as in the case of the Chibok schoolgirls, it should at least feel guilty. I
thought no Nigerian leader could look the distraught parents in the face and
still speak words that hurt.
I was
proved wrong on Thursday, as I read with disbelief what “Mama Taraba” Aisha
Alhassan told the Chibok parents during a meeting in Aso Villa. Here were
agonising parents transported from Chibok by the #BringBackOurGirls (BBOG)
movement to receive consolation from the powers that be. Here were parents
expecting the presidency to tell them when to expect their long lost daughters.
The presence of Hajiya Alhassan, who is also Nigeria’s minister of women
affairs, must have reassured them that there was a mother who would protect
their interests. How then could Alhassan, a mother and grandmother who is still
hoping to be awarded the governorship of TarabaState,
have spat on their faces?
“Mama
Taraba”, first, told the grieving parents they were not invited to the villa.
Then, she reportedly told them that the girls were not kidnapped under the
current government, “so why are you harassing us?” As if the diatribe was not
enough, Minister Alhassan reminded them: “You wanted schools, you wanted
hospitals, you wanted this and that… you wanted so many things.”
Professor Ali Mazurui wrote it all in his seminal work titled: “The African
Bigman”. And by this, I think he meant to refer to those Africans who inherited
the elite dynamics and dialectics of the departing Colonial Masters, and who
always want to act similarly in their colonial-mentalities and ways of doing
things. Also, methinks he was also referring to those emerging and emerged
African elites in their countries after independence, who lack humility in all
they do, especially because of their belief that they have attained high
societal positions that gives them the leverage to flaunt their kind of
attitudes (and therein knowingly and unknowingly trample on the less
privileged).
*Perpetual Victims
Yes! There is what could be regarded as “African Bigman
Syndrome”; which emanates truly from “Colonial Mentality”; whose roots is
surely, as we earlier said, from “Colonial Mental Attitude”. Indeed, Africans
who became elites after the departure of the white Colonial Masters, and indeed
those who replaced the departing Colonial Bourgeoisies in commercial and
administrative positions of authority (inheriting and living in their then big
houses, segregated Government Reserved Areas, using their types of big cars,
joining their segregated clubs, wearing their kind of clothing, eating their
kinds of food and drinking their kind of wine, etc) developed a syndrome of bigmanism
that “sickens” them all the time; making them to want to separate and
discriminate other down-trodden Africans (their less privileged brothers and
sisters). And this sickness has lingered from the days of our political flag
independence (we are yet to be economically independent), and have now,
dove-tailed-into what could be called/posited and asserted affirmatively today
as “Chronic Elite Conspiracy” against the masses of Nigeria.
What is this endemic elite-disease? What are its operative
methodologies? How has it affected the socio-political and economic aspects of
our society (country, nation, nation-state or call it whatever name you like!)?
Let’s attempt an answer! But before we do this, please permit us to first of
all define the three key words that are entrenched-in and encapsulates this
topic: Chronic; Elite and Conspiracy.
According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary, Chronic means:
Lingering; lasting; bad; intense; severe; acute; constant. Elite means: Best
(of a group); Select group or class. Conspiracy means: Act of conspiracy;
combination for unlawful purpose; plot; agreement to say nothing concerning a
matter.
Therefore, having all these definitions in mind, and having
observed the obvious display of the kind of mannerism (attitude) and actions of
Nigerian elites since her independence in 1960, can it not be rightly said
then, that a lingering/long lasting plot (which is definitely unlawful in
purposes) has been unleashed by a select group or class of Nigerians (who
through their high intellectual, administrative and commercial-enterprise
positions); have denied a vast majority/generality of Nigerians (through
discreet and open operating methods) their rights to their basic needs of life
(like food, shelter, clothing, education, medical care, employment, water,
electricity, transportation facilities, security and other social
amenities/utilities and services) and freedom; and also used the people’s
resources and wealth (commonwealth actually) to better themselves (which they
consciously and unconsciously concretized through their high-conspiratorial
high-life)?
By Dan Amor Nigeria is a nation of experts without roots. We are always
creating tacticians who are blind to strategy and strategists who cannot even
take a step. And when the culture has finished its work, the weak institutions
handcuff the infirmity. But what is at the centre of the panic which is our
national culture since we are not yet free to choose our leaders?
*Buhari and Obasanjo
Seeing how
ineligible dunces who don't even understand the secret of their private appeal,
talk less of what the nation needs jostle for power, I realize all over again
that Nigeria
is an unhappy contract between the rich and the poor. It is not that Nigeria is
altogether hideous, it is even by degrees pleasant, but for an honest observer,
there is hardly any salt in the wind.
Yet, in Nigeria, the myth of politics and the reality of life have diverged too far. There is nothing to return them to one another: no common love, no cause, no desire, and most essentially, no agreement here. Nigeria needed a hero before the exit of the White man, a hero central to his time. Nigeria needed a man whose personality might suggest contradictions and mysteries which could reach into the alienated circuits of the underground, because only a hero can capture the secret imagination of a people, and so be good for the vitality of his nation. A hero embodies the fantasy and so allows each private mind the liberty to consider its fantasy and find a way to grow. Each mind can become more conscious of its desires and waste less strength in hiding from itself. Roosevelt was such a hero, and Churchill, Lenin, De Gaulle and Mandela. Even Hitler, to take the most odious example of this argument, was a hero, the hero-as-monster, embodying what had become the monstrous fantasy of a people, but the horror upon which the radical mind and liberal temperament foundered was that he gave outlets to the energies of the Germans, and so presented the twentieth century with an index of how horrible had become the secret heart of its desires.
By Ugochukuwu Ejinkeonye By Wednesday,
April 1, 2015 when Nigeria’s
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) announced General Muhammadu
Buhari of the All Progressives Congress (APC) the winner of the March 2015
presidential elections, the rainy season was already here with us. And as all
keen and informed observers of Nigeria’s
power sector were already fully aware, at that particular season each year, we
usually witnessed some improvement in electricity supply due to the increase in
the water level usually witnessed at our dams; and 2015 was certainly not going
to be an exception.
*President Buhari and Lai Mohammed
While the APC
and its supporters were all over the place immersed in boundless revelling, chest-beatings
and other self-congratulatory gestures, and asking anyone whose ear they were
able to attract to await the wonders and miracles which the APC had so freely
and loudly promised during the elections now that their “Wonder Man” has won
the election, I visited a shop near my office. And there I saw a barely
literate young man who was so happy with himself as he confidently told the few
people who had some time to spare for his poorly coordinated lectures about what
he perceived as Buhari’s pre-inauguration accomplishments:
“You see what I have been saying? The man has not even
been sworn in and we are already enjoying light [electricity supply] every day!
What will happen then when he is sworn in? Just wait and see! Once he enters
there, you will see how everything will change!”
His cocksureness
was amazing. He spoke pidgin English, and so what I have attempted here is mere
paraphrase of his happy outbursts.
Now, one could
easily ignore this clear advertisement of ignorance, but after listening to that
fellow that bright afternoon, and thought about the matter later, I begun to have
this fear lurking somewhere in me that the APC, given its antecedents and
distinguishing character, might soon start reechoing this fellow. Anyone who closely observed the party during
the campaigns and elections would readily recall that, somehow, it does not easily
recoil from saying just anything that can help it win a few more ears no matter
how easily such claims would simply evaporate in the face of reality.
And so, I had
to quickly write an article entitled, “Electricity:
Can Buhari Break The Jinx?” in which I attempted an analysis of why,
in my view, former President Goodluck Jonathan could not achieve an impressive
record in the power sector and urged Buhari and his people to hasten to do the
right things to achieve a name for themselves since they had unduly raised the
people’s expectations during the campaigns. Then I gave them the timely counsel
which is contained in the following extract:
“Now, it is a known
fact that during each rainy season, there is usually some improvement in
electricity supply as currently being witnessed by Nigerians. But instead of
deploying solid effort to increase the amount of electricity generation and
distribution in the country, the government may naively choose to sit still and
start announcing this development as one of its ‘great achievements.’ That would amount to repeating the folly of
previous administrations which had also done that forgetting that the rains
would soon go away and they would run out of lies trying to explain away the
biting reality that would dawn with the sudden return of darkness.”
Prof Charles Chukwuma Soludo, former governor of Central Bank of Nigeria and former governorship aspirant in AnambraState,
got the nation anxious again when he declared in a no-holds-barred manner that
former President Goodluck Jonathan ran the Central Bank of Nigeria in manners akin to that of Uganda’s
late dictator, Idi Amin. Soludo did not fall short of accusing the former
president of ordering the CBN to ‘print’ say, N3 trillion under the guise of
creating an intervention fund for national stability but which is eventually
doled out to prosecute an election campaign or just about anything the
president fancies. He further described the CBN as the presidency’s ATM under
Jonathan.
*Soludo
Such an unsubstantiated grave allegation coming from a man like
Soludo is, indeed, worrisome. That a man of Soludo’s status would condescend so
low, throw caution to the wind, jump on the bandwagon, play to the gallery and
take advantage of the political situation in Nigeria to make spurious
allegations unscrupulously against the former president is a sign of the
decline and amnesia which has gripped our political class in the last eight
months.
Apart from the fact that such unguarded outburst is false, the timing is
instructive.
In the months prior to the appointment of Ministers by President
Buhari, Soludo was so desperate to be noticed that he suddenly became vocal in
condemning the immediate past administration and accused them of just anything
that tickled his fancy all in a bid to get Buhari’s attention. His nearly
endless tirade against Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Nigeria’s immediate past Minister
of Finance and
Coordinating Minister of the Economy, is legendary. Despite all his efforts,
President Buhari overlooked him and settled for someone who by her deportment
is timid and easily malleable than a Soludo who is brash, rash, abrasive,
confrontational and does ITK (I Too Know).
After having missed that opportunity, and with the growing rumour that the job
of the current CBN Governor, Godwin Emefiele, is hanging in the balance
following the shambolic state of our economy and the continued slide in the
value of the naira, it is time for Soludo to remind Buhari that he is still
jobless and quite available for the CBN top job, and the only way to do this
since he does not have direct access to the president is to criticise the past
administration for just anything that would make him sound as being in the same
boat with the president and his men, and probably be considered for a job in
the current administration.
However, a look at Soludo’s leadership of the CBN between May 29,
2004 and May 29, 2009, when he held sway there leaves much to be desired.
Instead
of giving Nigerians the change you championed, give them excuses. Blame
Goodluck Jonathan for everything.
In six years of Goodluck Jonathan’s presidency, the
opposition told us again and again the man was “clueless.” It made sure the tag
stuck to him like glue. But now we have a new sheriff in town, with the APC
claiming to be better at everything than the PDP. While that might still be
subject to debate, there is overwhelming evidence that in the cluelessness
department, the PDP is certainly no match for the APC.
*Jonathan and Buhari
Here is a compendium from the APC textbook of
cluelessness, provided within barely one year in office. If you want to know
how to be a clueless president, this is the APC blueprint.
Instead of giving Nigerians the change you championed,
give them excuses. Blame Goodluck Jonathan for everything, including the
harmattan. Whenever you make a blunder, pass the buck to the former president.
If there is petrol shortage, blame it on Goodluck Jonathan. If the budget is
dead on arrival, blame it on Goodluck Jonathan.
In the middle of an economic crisis, promise to provide
Nigerians with free education; free meals daily for millions of Nigerian public
school-children; free tertiary education; free health-care and free houses.
Facing a drastic drop in Nigeria’s
income, declare you will be giving grants of N1.5 trillion a year to Nigeria’s poor.
When you fail to deliver on any on these highfalutin promises, blame it quickly
on Goodluck Jonathan.
Forget the name of your vice-presidential running-mate.
Call him Yemi Osunbade instead of Yemi Osinbajo. Tell President Obama the name
of your political party is the All Nigeria’s Peoples’ Congress when it is All
Progressives Congress. Call your party on CNN the All Progressives Confidence.
By
Kparobo M. Ehvwubare
Four years after the amalgamation of Nigeria, an ex-Judge Stocker, described
the Contraption called Nigeria as a form of system he called: The Nigerian System. He described the Nigerian system as "A setback to a condition of things resembling the barbarous ages”. As at the time, “The Nigerian system”
was and is still the most infernal system that was ever designed for the
express purpose of humiliating and depressing the units of any loyal and
progressive community.
(pix:homestrings)
The three basic principles for the successful
working of the Nigerian System were and are still: *IGNORANCE, FEAR and MILITARY
TERRORISM: Infernal – extremely evil or cruel; expressive of cruelty or
befitting hell.
The Nigerian System– Designed To Fail To restrain and subvert the greed and selfishness of the Emirs because of his consistent dread of a Jihad or holy war against him or his government in the Northern Protectorate, Lord Fredrick Lugard charmed them into submission with the princely salary and a 50% allocation of the native’s treasury funds. These funds were derived from direct taxation thereby creating a distinction, without a difference between their private and public funds.
While Sir Lugard humored at the greed of these Emirs and the ignorance of the peasant natives, he had a successful rule as a mini-god, as long as he did not tamper with their religion. Hence, the cementation of the system where only “a few were beneficiary of state funds while the peasants were at the mercy of a ruling class”. In that system, he termed as the “indirect rule” in the Northern Protectorate. He had subtly guided these Emirs {ruling class} to the center of the garden to taste the fruit of knowledge, and to be able to decipher between good and bad while the natives were left in perpetual ignorance.
Things did not work out so well when Lugard arrived the Southern Protectorate and the Lagos Colony. There, he met missionary schools in several nooks and corners, educated natives with a system of government that was designed to progress. During his presentation on taxation policy to the parliament in 1913, he was bombarded with several questions on these policies and considerations were put forward on the affordability in defense of the natives. These didn’t quite go well with the god-emperor Sir Frederick Lugard. Ignorance was not going to be a basic tool for success in the Southern Protectorate/Colony as it were in the Northern Protectorate.
Most of the Princes and some commoners of the Southern Protectorate were already scholars of western education. Hence, history reports that Sir Fredrick’s policy met with such a lamentable and disastrous failure in the Lagos Colony and Southern Provinces. The darkness of ignorance from the Northern provinces was dispelled by the people of the Southern provinces championing Rights, Liberty and Justice.
Faced with the challenges of imposing the "divide and rule by ignorance” policy of the Northern provinces on the Southern Provinces and Colony that was strongly opposed by the natives of the Southern provinces, Sir Fredrick Lugard thereby devised the sudden thoughts of creating the CONTRAPTION called UNITED NIGERIA.