By Moses E. Ochonu
We live in a hyper-partisan
time, in which the desire to score political points and spruce up the record of
one’s political camp has replaced responsible citizenship. We concede that
misinformation, distortion, overzealousness, and exuberance grow naturally from
excessive partisanship. Even so, the current situation in Nigeria is
uniquely depressing. Truth has taken flight, replaced by propaganda, lies, and
exaggerations.
Propaganda has become the
political currency of the time, traded, exchanged, and valued by partisans on
both sides of the political divide. And the biggest culprits at this time are
Buharists. This is ironic because President Muhammadu Buhari, the man whom the
Buharists adore and are eager to present in good light, has a reputation for
truth telling, candor, and self-effacing bluntness.
During the last government, former
President Goodluck Jonathan's supporters were given to exaggerations of his
successes — if they can be called that. They were also notorious for
downplaying or refusing even in the face of evidence to acknowledge his
failures.
It was under that government
that the Chibok kidnapping and other tragic failures were shamelessly denied or
trivialized while routine government businesses were promoted to acts of
elevated statecraft, of transformative success.
In truth, the Jonathanians were
sometimes responding to the taunts of critics, mostly supporters of the APC,
who would not acknowledge any achievements of that government and were eager to
exaggerate its failures. Even in the domain of terrorism where people were
dying, many of the former president’s detractors sounded like cheerleaders for
Boko Haram, while the Jonathanians, who trafficked denials and willful
ignorance, sounded like mean-spirited people who did not care about human life.
To compound matters, the
Jonathanians were embellishing or outright fabricating achievements to make
their hero appear more competent that he actually was.
Unfortunately, we are seeing
the same with Buharists.
The exaggerations of the
Buharists have been as nauseating as they have been deceptive. I have
encountered many, but a few examples from just the last few days will do. Two
days ago, Leadership newspaper published a story claiming that Nigeria
had been deleted from Transparency International’s corruption index. The story
went viral in the All Progressives Congress (APC) universe. It was widely and
enthusiastically shared by Buharists, who marketed it as proof that their man
had miraculously cured Nigeria
of its corruption ailment. None of them stopped to interrogate the story’s
veracity, or its premise. None paused to reflect on the fact that countries
CANNOT be deleted from the index, that they can only move up or down on it.
It turns out that Nigeria only
moved a few spots down but is of course still ranked very high on the index. If Leadership was guilty of journalistic sloppiness,
it gave Buharists an elastic platform to propagate their hero’s supposed
miraculous anticorruption touch. Their intention was clear. They were trying to
make more from a routine fluctuation in Nigeria ’s ranking on that index.
They were trying to insinuate Buhari’s anticorruption drive into the index.
They were claiming that Buhari is the reason Nigeria was “deleted,” never mind
that no such “deleting” had occurred.
When the president went on
vacation recently and handed over to the vice president as the constitution
requires, Buharists saw an opening for another propaganda. My Facebook timeline
was flooded by praises and paeans to the president for “being the first president in Nigeria ’s history to hand over to
his deputy when going on vacation.” The claim is an outright lie as the
late president Umaru Yar’Adua similarly handed over to then vice president,
Goodluck Jonathan, when he went on vacation. But truth and history cannot stand
in the way of Buharists. They care more about controlling the narrative on
their hero than about perspective.
Two days ago, someone posted a
Facebook update that the Nigerian Customs had recovered 160 billion Naira in
two days from the Seme Border alone, and that Buhari had recovered $2 Trillion
through the TSA. The post was then widely shared, garnered many likes, and made
its way to my timeline. The Facebook posters provided no links and no direct
quotes, so I knew I had to do some digging. I regarded both claims with
skepticism as both seemed implausible, but I remained open-minded and wished
that they were true for our country's sake.
Then I read the actual news
stories depicting the true state of things. I also watched a clip of the president’s
speech to the Nigerian community in London ,
where he made the 2 trillion revelation.
It turns out that the Customs
figure is actually 160 million Naira, not billion. The 2 trillion figure is 2
trillion Naira, not dollars as the Facebook Buharists had claimed. In the
propagandist hands of Buharists, millions became billions and Naira became
dollar — all in order to magnify Buhari's success.
Not only that, the Buharists,
perhaps following the example of Nigeria 's incompetent journalists,
reported that the government had "recovered" the said 2 trillion.
This is at best an embellishment, an attempt to deceive at worst. The
monies were not stolen or missing and so could not have been
"recovered." They were in many bank accounts maintained by MDAs in
different banks. TSA implementation simply identified these accounts and then
collated the monies in them in one single federal account with the CBN.
To use the language of recovery is to
insinuate that the monies had been stolen. It is also to suggest that the
monies would have been stolen or lost had they not been collated, or that the
mere fact of being collected in one single treasury account insulates the
monies from being stolen in parts or wholes. Unless we have the power of
divination, we simply cannot know that.
In this particular case, it is
hard to tell whether ignorance or intentional deception is responsible. It is
probably both; with the unthinking Buharists fueled by ignorance and the
Machiavellian ones embracing deception as a fair weapon in political warfare.
Much of the blame in this particular case has to go to Nigerian newspaper headline
casters, who went with the “recover” verb.
The president himself did not
use the word “recovered.” He used “mopped up.” Mopping up means collecting or
collating. Nigerian newspaper subeditors, either out of an instinct for
sensationalism or an inability to discern the difference, went with
“recovered.” The Buharists were all too happy to extend the narrative, to give
life to the misleading trope.
It is also interesting that,
unlike his fawning, overeager supporters, the president correctly and honorably
stated in his London
speech that TSA was in fact the initiative of the last administration but that
its implementation was stalled because that government succumbed to
bureaucratic pushback. The president is apparently unaware that his diehard supporters
have already constructed an alternative history for the TSA. That version of
the narrative credits the Buhari administration with both initiating and
implementing the important reform. Buharists need to emulate their hero’s truth
telling ways if they truly love him.
We are too desperate to make
our favorite political figures look good or to insulate them from legitimate
criticism when responsible, critical followership is what they deserve and need
from us. As it was with the Jonathanians, so it is now with the Buharists.
No comments:
Post a Comment