By Chuks Iloegbunam
The object of this second half of my article is to
challenge Nigeria and
Nigerians: Please make an honest effort at determining the truth of Nigeria ’s
contemporary history! It is the sure way of exorcising the demons needlessly
thwarting every chance of Nigeria
attaining nationhood. If Nigeria
refuses to confront the truth of its history, it will continue to tug at
centrifugal forces guaranteed to eternally forestall any contingency of
mastering the contradictions that dog every centimetre of the country’s path.
The 50th anniversary of the January 1966 coup d’etat
afforded the country a golden opportunity to turn its back permanently against
historical lies, especially lies of the variety that inflame passions and
further entrench the existing divisions between the disparate peoples forged
into one country by the sleight of British colonialism. Unfortunately, revisionists
seized the public space, retold falsehoods previously discredited and, thus,
blew the opportunity.
Reuben Abati is one such revisionist. In the first
half of this article, we exposed his lies in an article he entitled Armed
Forces Day: January 15, Remembering Where We Came From. Abati had
claimed in that article that “An Igbo man, Nwafor Orizu, the acting President,
handed over power to another Igbo man, General Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi.” We proved
that this was blatantly untrue. He had also downplayed Aguiyi-Ironsi’s central
role in putting down the coup, for which we pointed out that he was being
disingenuous.
There are two other distortions in Abati’s article
that must be discredited. He wrote that (1) Aguiyi-Ironsi treated the January
coup plotters with kid gloves, and (2) Aguiyi-Ironsi imposed Igbo hegemony on Nigeria .
Whether in scholarship or in journalism, whoever made claims such as these,
would be expected to deploy empirical evidence in support of his assertions.
But not Abati. We must dismantle his fabrications, of course. Before doing
that, however, some background information is imperative. Fifteen years ago,
Abati wrote a two-part article entitled Obasanjo,
Secession And The Secessionists (The Guardian on Sunday, December 16
and 23, 2001).
That article contained all the lies that he
regurgitated in his latest piece. It elicited a lot of reaction from
observers of the Nigerian condition who believed that Abati should know
better, and should wield his pen with some circumspection. We will return to
this. Let’s first reexamine the facts. Abati said that Nzeogwu and his cohorts
were treated with kid gloves? In Nzeogwu: An Intimate Portrait Of Major
Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu (Spectrum Books, Ibadan 1987) Olusegun
Obasanjo reproduced copies of handwritten letters from his friend, Nzeogwu,
which detailed the ill-treatment they suffered in detention. But far more important
is the fact that Aguiyi-Ironsi’s Supreme Military Council (SMC) took a
decision to subject the coup plotters to public trial.
*Nzeogwu |
In his biography, Reminiscence, (Malthouse, Lagos,
1989), General David Ejoor states that Aguiyi-Ironsi’s Supreme SMC, of which
Ejoor was a member, decided on the trial of the January coup makers (p39).
Also, in The Barrel Of A Gun: The Politics Of Coups d’Etat In Africa ,
(Allen Lane The Penguin Press, London, 1970), Professor Ruth First attributes
the following to Hassan Usman Katsina. “By
July (1966), the minutes of the SMC recorded that the young majors were to be
court-martialed not later than October. The proceedings were to be in public.”
(p307). General Hassan, also a member of Ironsi’s SMC, lived for over 25 years
after First’s book was published but never denied the statements credited to
him. Aguiyi-Ironsi was assassinated two months before the court-martials were
to begin. So where is Abati’s kid and where are his gloves? I must state in
parenthesis that Yakubu Gowon was Head of State for nine years, without
court-martialing a single participant in the January and July coups. Yet no one
ever blamed him.
It is a horrendous amputation of Nigerian history for
Abati to state that Aguiyi-Ironsi’s regime was a promotion of Igbo hegemony.
Of Aguiyi-Ironsi’s nine-member SMC, the highest decision-making body in the
country, only two were Igbo – Ironsi (by virtue of being Head of State) and
Ojukwu (because he was a Military Governor). The SMC had three Yoruba members –
Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe (Chief of Staff, Armed Forces), Commodore Akinwale
Wey (Head of Navy) and Colonel Adekunle Fajuyi (Military Governor, West). The
North had two members: Colonel Yakubu Gowon (Chief of Army Staff and Colonel
Hassan Usman Katsina (Military Governor, North). Other members were Colonel
George Kurobo (Izon) (Chief of Air Force ), Colonel David Ejoor (Urhobo
(Military Governor, Midwest ).
The Federal Executive Council had the same membership
as the SMC, plus Attorney General Gabriel Onyiuke (Igbo), and Police Inspector
General Kam Selem (Borno). Aguiyi-Ironsi appointed 21 Federal Permanent
Secretaries. Of these, only three were Igbo – P. C. Asiodu (Industries), T. C.
M. Eneli (Establishments) and B. N. Okagbue (Health). Four were from the West,
five from the North and eight – If Asiodu is included – from the Midwest . Aguiyi-Ironsi also appointed Alhaji Sule Katagun
the chairman of the Public Service Commission. He appointed Mr. Howson-Wright
the chairman of the Nigerian Railway Corporation (NRC). He appointed Mr. A. I.
Obiyan the chairman of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA). He appointed Mr. H.
O. Omenai the chairman of the Nigeria Airways. None of the four came from the
East; none was Igbo. No Northerner was superseded in military promotions. No
officer was promoted under Aguiyi-Ironsi that was not due for promotion, except
Major Hassan Usman Katsina who was pitchforked over about 15 Igbo officers to
become a Lieutenant Colonel!
If Aguiyi-Ironsi’s appointments are compared to those
of President Muhammadu Buhari, for instance, it will readily be determined who
the hegemonic cap fits.
To return to Abati’s 2001 article! It provoked numerous indignant
responses. Obi Nwakanma took him to the cleaners in Abati’s
Revisionisms And Distortions Of Nigeria’s History and Samuel Bayo
Arowolaju made a mincemeat of him in The
Fallacy Of Reuben Abati: Igbo And Secession.
I engaged him in Reuben Abati
And Other Anti-Igbo Bigots In Nigeria.
I have provided these web links for people to read and
confirm that our subject is an incorrigible artist in perfidy. Although I
count Abati as a friend, I had tagged him “a
conceited ignoramus” in my 2011 piece. Today, the temptation is
overpowering to dub him a recalcitrant recidivist. But, I will resist it and,
instead, introduce specificity in my challenge to Nigeria and Nigerians.
The original copy, and exemplifications, of the Magna
Carta, the charter of liberty and political rights that rebellious barons
obtained from King John of England
in 1215, survive to this day and are available for public scrutiny. That is the
way of serious countries desirous of learning the appropriate lessons of
history. In Nigeria ,
priceless historical documents are either doctored or destroyed or dumped in
private vaults, a lamentable practice that encourages Abati’s ilk to go sowing
the seeds of discord. Nigeria
should place the transcripts of the meetings of Aguiyi-Ironsi’s SMC in the
public domain. This will, among other things, confirm that the body had decided
to court-martial the January 1966 coup plotters.
Also, 50 years after the event, the document by which
parliamentarians handed over power to the military remains in private hands of
Alhaji Abdul Rasak (SAN). He should be persuaded to relinquish it to the
Nigerian state.
*Mr. Chuks Iloegbunam, an eminent essayist, journalist and author of several books, writes column on the back page of The Authority newspaper every Tuesday.
What a brilliant, accurate, and an exceptionally delightful commentary by Mr. Iloegbunam? Reuben Ngbati Abati has always been an Igbophobe and it was on that account that I frowned at president Jonathan's appointing of him as his media aide. I told my fellow Igbos that Ebele could not love or respect Igbos if he could appoint an unapologetic Igbophobe like Abati to speak for him.
ReplyDeleteWhat we know now, as has been confirmed by that Ijo leader (Edwin Clark, who recently denounced Jonathan) is that Abati under-served Jonathan. At various points, and because of his incompetence or willful sabotaging of the then president, attempts were made to fire him but he held the president hostage by always threatening to write a book about the on-goings and inner workings within the Jonathan administration. That had me wondering if president Jonathan could stupidly have given him that job without getting him to sign a non disclosure form (other than on strictly non classified government business matters).
Reuben Abati is afflicted with the intellectual laziness for which most Nigerian intellectuals are notorious. Some of the symptoms of that intellectual laziness are rumor mongering, Igbophobia, making claims without proofs, distortion of facts, outright dissemination of falsehood, etc. Reuben Abati is so intellectually blemished by these foibles that a veteran journalist, Duro Onabolue, cautioned him severally over them and even warned him against his obvious Igbophobia.
The sad apart on Nigerian scholarship is that people like Abati append "Dr." to their names but write like bolekaja high school dropouts.
Tufiakwa!
Nebukadineze Adiele
Nebu has made so many claims here. And in order to avoid the tag of "intellectual laziness" that he accused others of, he should have made at least a little effort to prove some of his allegations.
ReplyDeleteNebu, please send us a link of where Onabule accused Abati of Igbophobia and cautioned him.