By Uche Ezechukwu
The
mantra of ‘change’, mouthed by the All Progressive Congress (APC) during the
electoral campaigns was so appealing at the time to Nigerians, such that when
they ushered Muhammadu Buhari into office by voting out Goodluck Jonathan, hope
became the most abundant commodity in Nigeria . When APC promised that
they were going to recreate for Nigerians a heaven on earth, they were believed
and trusted, especially as that ‘change promise’ was being steered by a man
that was reputed to be a man of truth.
*Bola Tinubu and President Buhari |
For a country that places little premium on competence and proven track record,
not much thought was extended on Buhari’s ability to understand, not to talk of
being able to confront the complex demands of modern-day issues. Even those who
had queried his intellectual capacity to face up to those modern-day challenges
were shouted down. Nigerians wanted their man; they got him. Ten months into
President Muhammadu Buhari’s APC administration, it has become obvious, even to
the APC bosses themselves, that talk is cheap, and that as the saying goes here
in Nigeria, ‘khaki no be leather’.
One does not have to be ‘a wailer’ to see and accept that nothing is working in today’s
For instance, there was no way the Buhari administration could continue to blame Goodluck Jonathan for the president’s inability to pick ministers for six whole months; nor could the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) be blamed for having anything to do with the fact that when PMB eventually did pick his ministers, they were mostly lack-lustre and lacking in pedigree, accounting for the fact that the cabinet does not have one single person whose voice commands authority in the field of economic management. Many have wondered if the problem with the embarrassingly low quality of Buhari’s team is the lack of the ability, ab initio, of the president to distinguish copper from gold.
Yet, there are many other informed observers who believe, like an article of faith, that the problem with the inertia of the current cabinet members who have definitely not performed, might not be in their personal lack of capacity, but rather, in the absence of a definite roadmap, as it is widely alleged that no minister can as much as sharpen a pencil without the president’s say-so. Which should not be a surprise, as, after all, over 90 per cent of them were picked not on their individual merit as proven performers, but rather because they were cronies of either Buhari or Ahmed Tinubu, the ‘owner’ of the other half of the party that brought the votes and the cash.