By Paul Onomuakpokpo
Since our leaders have
failed to learn from the past, they have currently embarked on a voyage of
stretching the resilience of the nation and its people to the limit. To them,
no calamitous consequences could attend this. They feel secure in the delusion
that since the civil war could not dismember the nation, nothing else could.
This is why when the victims of killer herdsmen cry for justice, they are
ignored. It is the same way that those who agitate for restructuring are
dismissed as national irritants. The beneficiaries of the warped polity send
the subtle message to the oppressed that they have nowhere to go; they just
have to learn to accept their bleak lot.
*Buhari and Saraki |
These injustices have
not really precipitated an insurrection that provokes the searing memories of
the civil war simply because it is the poor citizens of the country who are
significantly their victims. Or could there have been the civil war if a member
of the ruling class, Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, had not considered himself as the
embodiment of the persecution of the Igbo? Would the poor Igbo have resorted to
secession as a means of ending the injustice being meted out to them by their
fellow citizens?
But the country is
taken to the precipice of crisis, and its heightened form, dismemberment when
it is the members of the ruling clique who feel betrayed by their colleagues.
Again, the civil war bears out this – did Odumegwu-Ojukwu call for arms because
what was primarily at stake was the need to stop the mass killing of his people
or that of redressing a personal insult of those beneath him transforming into
his superiors?
Throughout history, the fact is the same – personal squabbles become national
tragedies. In the dark days of military regimes in Africa ,
there were palace coups because some soldiers felt affronted by the arrogance
of their colleagues.
Now, the brewing
crisis between the presidency of Muhammadu Buhari and the Senate of Bukola
Saraki poses a mortal danger to the continued existence of the nation. It has
gone beyond recurrent disagreement as a staple of democracy. What we are faced
with now is a smouldering fire that could imperil the nation’s democracy.