By Paul Onomuakpokpo
Those who
really want President Muhammadu Buhari to succeed in his campaign against
corruption must be scandalised by the efforts of his so-called supporters to
persuade him to dismiss the allegations of corruption against Ibrahim Magu as
merely constituting a self-serving canard that is not worth his attention. The
president’s friends do not see the need to investigate the allegations by the
Senate that the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)
is amenable to the patronage of those he is supposed to investigate for
corruption and his complicity in other myriad unethical practices that have
rendered him ineligible to occupy that high office.
|
*Ibrahim Magu |
These friends and
those of Magu have instigated a rash of lobbying activities geared at making
the president to re-nominate Magu for confirmation as the EFCC chair. It has
been said that the debate on whether to retain Magu or not has split the
kitchen cabinet of the president. The Senate is equally split as some senators
led by Senate Majority Leader Ali Ndume are trying to persuade their colleagues
to rescind their decision not to confirm Magu.
Yet, the issue
requires far more than lobbying. For whether the anti-corruption campaign of
Buhari retains whatever credibility it still has now or not depends on how the
Magu issue is resolved. Thus for the anti-corruption campaign to continue and
indeed gain greater verve, the allegations against Magu must not be glossed
over. True, the Senate that accused Magu of corruption is perceived to have
lost its lustre in a murky cesspool of malfeasance. Its leader, Bukola Saraki
is being tried by the Code of Conduct Tribunal for corruption-related cases.
There are other members of the Senate, especially former governors, who are
facing cases of corruption. Despite the mounting pressure from the public, the
Senate has refused to be transparent in its finances. The fogginess about their
salaries and allowances and their extravagant lifestyles conflict with the
desperate economic crisis of the nation. But we must resist the temptation to
quickly dismiss the senators’ position until their allegations are
investigated. It is only after this that we can be sure whether the Senate took
their position in furtherance of their own interest or that of the nation. It
is hasty to argue that by the Senate’s position, it is evident that corruption
is fighting back.
Those who are
insisting on saving Magu without investigating the allegations against him are
not helping the anti-corruption fight. For even if the president is able to
persuade the Senate to make a barefaced volte-face and confirm Magu, this would
not help the anti-corruption campaign as long as there are no convincing
responses by him to the allegations of corruption. To the extent that Magu on
whom unresolved corruption charges are hanging retains his job as the chief
prosecutor of the fight against sleaze in public offices, the anti-corruption
fight has suffered an intolerable travesty that would only render the nation a
butt of crude jokes in the comity of transparent nations. If Magu is found
guilty of the charges, Buhari should allow him to face prosecution.