By Mike Ozekhome
This topic, “Building Bridges for a New Nigeria,” admits two things, namely, that Nigeria has failed or is failing; and there was an old Nigeria which was divided and that there is the need for a new Nigeria whose goal is to improve relationships among people who are very different, or do not like each other. So, this topic is about how to foster good relations among Nigerians.
*OzekhomeEthnicity, language and religion have divided and destroyed Nigeria. They drive our politics. Some Nigerians will vote for a thief provided he is from their tribe. Ethnicity, language and religion promote disunity, unhealthy rivalry and disenchantment. In this presentation, I will examine and probe the problems, and discern how bridge-building is the way forward for this nation. I particularly like the goals of Nzuko Umunna (NU), which is a general platform for creating effective management of Igbo professionals, both at home and in the diaspora, uniting and bridging the gap between the various Igbo groups; and promoting cooperation, peace and good neighbourliness between Igbos and other ethnic groups in Nigeria.
Through its handshake across the Niger and handshake across Nigeria programmes, Nzuko Umunna has demonstrated its love for, and belief in one healthy Nigeria. NU is therefore a metaphor for the average Igbo man and woman’s gregariousness to live anywhere with other Nigerians of whatever ethnicity, religion, language or culture. Highly Republican, extremely industrious, aggressively innovative and painstakingly dedicated to a course they believe in, the Igbos constitute the second largest ethnic group after the indigenes in any part of Nigeria.
No other ethnic group believes in the unity,
indivisibility and indissolubility of Nigeria as the Igbos. It is therefore a
national embarrassment and shame when they are profiled for attacks,
denigration; disrespect or disregard, and regarded as a dot in the longer
circle of Nigeria. No! the Igbos are NOT A DOT. They are the pillars that hold
the Nigerian project together. Of Prof Onigu Otite’s 374 ethnic groups in
Nigeria that speak over 350 languages, the Igbos constitute the main link that
binds the beads of the other 373 ethnicities of Nigeria.
Nigeria’s creation was fundamentally flawed with the British
super-imposing Northern hegemony and dominance over Southern Nigeria. Nigeria
is an artificial creation. Indeed, the name Nigeria was given to her by a young
British journalist, Miss Flora Louisa Shaw (who later married Lord Lugard) on
8th January, 1897. What is today known as Nigeria was ruled by the Royal Niger
Company around 1886 to 1899. Following the revocation of its character, the
Royal Niger company sold its holdings in the territory which later became
Nigeria to British for £865,000.
This was the price for which Nigeria was purchased. (i.e., about
N 735.2 million only). By 1900, the Southern Nigeria Protectorate and Northern
Nigeria Protectorate passed from the Royal Niger Company to Britain. By 1st
January, 1914, these two territories were amalgamated as the Colony and
Protectorates of Southern and Northern Nigeria. The fusion of these two
territories was done for political and commercial reasons without any
consideration on the preferences of the inhabitants of these territories.
These people already had their set ways of life – the Benin and
Oyo Empires; Hausa City States; Igbo City States; Kanem Bornu, Ile-Ife
civilization cradle of the Yoruba race. We already had great historical figure
like Oba Ovonranmwen Nogbaisi of Benin Empire, King Nana of Itsekiri, King Jaja
of Opobo, Queen Amina, Mal Idriss Alooma, Queen Idia, etc.
INDEPENDENCE
Nnamdi Azikiwe, Ahmadu Bello, Obafemi Awolowo, Sir Tafawa
Balewa, Chief Anthony Enahoro, Joseph Tarka, Chief Dennis Osadebe, Herbert
Macaulay, etc., who fought, unarguably, for the flag independence of Nigeria
from Britain, in reality, projected the ideas of their enclaves. For example,
while people from the Southern part of Nigeria craved for independence in the
50’s, the people from Northern Nigeria felt the timing was wrong. Chief Anthony
Enahoro’s motion for Nigeria’s Independence suffered setbacks in parliament on
several occasions with the northern members of parliament staging a walkout as
a consequence of the motion.
However, in 1953, Enahoro initiated move to self-government
through the motion he sponsored in the Western House of Assembly. This
eventually led to Nigeria’s independence on 1st October, 1960. While it could
be argued that the people currently occupying the territory called Nigeria were
never consulted before the amalgamation of 1914, all of them lifted the
Nigerian flag the moment the Union Jack was lowered in October 1, 1960.
THE FIRST
COUP AND COUNTER COUP
Many who felt granting independence to Nigeria would usher in
unprecedented growth, were surprised to see unprecedented corruption, looting
of the nation’s treasury and mismanagement of the country by the supposedly
founding fathers of the Country. The military that came to salvage the problem
on 15th January, 1966, even compounded it by their lop-sided manner of cleansing
the system.
There is a conspiracy theory that the Igbos used the coup to
pave way for General Aguiyi-Ironsi to be Head of State of Nigeria. The Northern
members of the Nigerian Army did not hold back as they retaliated over the
killing of Ahmadu Bello, Tafawa Balewa, Maimalar and others by also
slaughtering many innocent Igbo soldiers and civilians through a genocidal
ethnic-cleansing. This eventually led to the Nigerian Civil War. There have
been many coup d’états in Nigeria since the 1966 coup d’état. However, since
the year 1999, there has not been any coup. There have been different
agitations springing up in some parts of the country.
THE OLD NIGERIA: DIVIDED BY ETHNICITY
Nigeria is a conglomeration or an aggregation of several
nationalities which makes the country a pluralistic and multi-faceted society.
The diversity of Languages, traditions, and customs contribute to the nation’s
vast cultural variety. By merging the numerous ethnicities into what is now
known as The Federal Republic of Nigeria, it is believed that Britain created
Nigeria. This is Lord Frederick Lugard’s fusion in 1914. The protectorate of
Northern Nigeria, the colony of Lagos, and the protectorate of Southern Nigeria
were amalgamated to form one nation. Without the approval of the numerous
ethnic nationalities, this was carried out to serve the interests of Britain.
The fight for power among the many ethnic groups in Nigeria began with this
deed.
Since Nigeria gained political independence in 1960, there has
been conflict between the country’s numerous ethnic nations about who will
dominate the political system and the country’s natural riches. This conflict
sparked the civil war that lasted from 1967 to 1970. Since the country’s
independence, ethnic politics have dominated Nigerian politics. The power
struggle between the three major parties during the First Republic was
characterized by instances of ethnic politics, particularly between the Action
Group (AG) led by Chief Obafemi Awolowo, with its base among the Yorubas of the
Southwest, the National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC) led by Dr. Nnamdi
Azikiwe, with its base among the Igbos of the Southeast, and the Northern
Peoples Congress (NPC) led by Sir Ahmadu Bello.
In the Second Republic, the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), led by
Chief Obafemi Awolowo, had control in the Southwest, causing this tripod
equilibrium to echo once more. Most of its adherents had previously been Chief
Obafemi Awolowo’s students. The Yorubas were in charge of the party. The
National Party of Nigeria (NPN), which had a more national orientation and
represented the legacy of the defunct NPC, had its main support base in the
North while the Nigeria People’s Party (NPP), led by Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe,
maintained power in the Igbo states of southeast Nigeria similar to the NCNC.
It should be noted that these ethnic-based political groups were more of a
revival of the First Republic’s ethnic politics.
The National
Republican Convention (NRC) and the Social Democracy Party (SDP) were the two
main political parties of the Third Republic, a failed military experiment
under General Ibrahim Babangida, which aimed to eliminate the Nigerian
political system’s “triangle of parties.” With the unfortunate annulment of the
presidential election of June 12, 1993, which was largely considered to have
been won by Bashorun M.K.O. Abiola of Yoruba descent from the Southwest, this
strategy almost succeeded in ending ethnic undertones to party politics in
Nigeria. It should be mentioned that the annulment sparked fierce ethnic, populist,
and regional animosity, especially in the country’s southwest.
The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), which is predominately
Yoruba in the Southwest, the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), which has a
predominantly Igbo membership in the Southeast, and the Congress for Positive
Change (CPC), which is predominately Hausa-Fulani in Northern Nigeria, are
examples of ethnically oriented political organizations operating in the
current Fourth Republic.
The 2023 general election conducted recently further showed how
divided Nigeria is. While Bola Tinubu of the All Progressive Congress had
massive support from the South-West, the candidate of Labour Party, Peter Obi,
had massive support from the South-East and South-South. Alhaji Atiku Abubakar
had massive support from most of the Northern States.
THE EFFECT
OF ETHNIC POLITICS
The Igbo, Yoruba, and Hausa ethnic groupings have long dominated
national politics among Nigeria’s nearly 250 ethnic groups and the federating
units. Perhaps this is due to their larger population, as well as their
moderately active participation in the various governments since Nigeria gained
colonial independence in 1960.
It has always irritated other minority ethnic groups. This
feeling of exclusion from Nigeria’s mainstream has led to distrust, dread, and
a sense of pessimism among these minority groups, which invariably has an
impact on their sense of patriotism as well as their sense of national identity
and psyche. There seems to be a growing sense of sub-nationalism among the
smaller ethnic communities, as well as a need and desire for the groupings to
control their own destiny. They doubt the idea of nationhood in the Nigerian
system and display a callous attitude toward problems that concern them.
This battle for political and economic
liberation is best exemplified by the people of the Niger Delta, which is
located in the South-South geopolitical region of Nigeria. The locals are now
in a state of despair as a result of oil exploration companies’ years-long
exploitation of the abundant natural resources in their area. Previous Niger
Delta political and thought leaders have unsuccessfully attempted to raise
awareness of the region’s predicament worldwide. People’s patience has now run
out after years of broken promises from several Nigerian governments and oil
firms active in the area. The Ijaw people in this area have now ascended. The
fight for an independent Ijaw State, or an Ijaw State to be taken seriously
inside a unified Nigeria, entered a new phase, one of armed conflict and
kidnappings, which lasted until the government’s amnesty program brought an end
to them.
The minority ethnic groups from the Nigerian Niger Delta region,
where the majority of the nation’s wealth is created, desire urgent and
immediate inclusion and being treated equally by the rest of the nation as
stakeholders in the Nigerian project. The agony of their environmental
degradation and social upheaval brought on by the exploitation of the natural
resources in their area is what they anticipate as a fair and appropriate
compensation for their contribution to the national economy.
The failure of the Nigerian government to satisfy these minority
ethnic groups’ aspirations has always manifested itself in agitation, which
frequently results in wars. The agitation is expressed more fiercely the more
strongly they perceive that the refusal to meet these demands is intentional
and unjustifiable.
If there is one thing all Nigerians are agreed upon, it is the
belief – fueled by disappointment and frustration – that have we have failed to
fulfil our potential as a nation, we are a long way from living up to the
dreams of our founding fathers. Right from our 21st year of independence (when
we hypothetically came of age), till date, few issues have consistently
featured in our national discourse (particularly in the media) as the “National
Debate”. By this is meant the seeming past time of virtually every Nigerian to
bemoan our experience as a nation. Simply put, Nigeria is a failed, and broken
nation. Apply every conceivable yardstick, according to every knowledgeable
(and not-so-knowledgeable) expert, the country is not just a disaster waiting
to happen – IT MAY ALREADY HAVE HAPPENED.
*Excerpts
from a lecture delivered on Friday, April 28, 2023, by Prof. Mike Ozekhome,
SAN, CON, OFR, FCIArb, LL.M, Ph.D, LL.D, D.Litt., on the occasion of the
Handshake Across Nigeria in Enugu, Nigeria.
If the metaphor of bridge is acceptable, we must accept the following
ReplyDelete1). Find out what damaged the bridge or, in the words of Prof Chinua Achebe, which knife destroyed the bridge and who put the knife in the thing that held the bridge together.
2). Deal with these two issues first before considering what materials to build a new bridge with and how to safeguard it so that it will not be damaged again.
3). I reiterate that the issue is our inauthentic values and that the solution is in discarding them, reviving the pristine (authentic, functional, effective and better) values, and covenanting (obligating) all Nigerians to their practice, with emphasis on the people in the federal and state governments, professional elites and monarchs.
4). His claim that Igbo people "are the pillars that hold the Nigerians project together" is NOT ONLY ABSOLUTELY WRONG, it is insulting and very offensive or obnoxious.
This kind of sordid statement is one of the causes of a sense of ethnic superiority which precipitates rivalry, strife, disagreement and antagonism.
If Igbo people do not like this statement of fact, no, truth, it shows that the statement is right lbecause a pillar carries any load that it is designed to carry.
But a better defence of the statement is that the pillar of Nigeria and Nigerians' project was our COMMUNALISM.
It should be noted that communalism was ontological, existential, ethical, axiological, moral, spiritual and everything else that can be said about Nigeria and Nigerians. Igbos are more individualistic than other people. They call their individualism "Republicanism". Note that American republicanism is also individualism. Republicanism and individualism go together.
Igbo people are more responsible for destroying our traditional communalism than any other ethnic group. For this reason, I hold them more guilty of our problems than I hold any other ethnic group guilty of our problems.
I should stop here about this piece that begs the issue or ignores it.
*Prince Peter Awele Odor