By Victor C. Ariole
Opacity and transparency are two axes that the African governance processes are greatly undermining. Hence African governments are rarely trusted by their people as either opposition groups are clamped upon by force or litigations that call upon the judiciary to adjudicate upon are embarked on, and somehow ridicule the images of the “learned”, the bench and the bar as some adjudications show in Nigeria.
World over there are governance processes that warrant opacity and those that must be absolutely transparent and elections are one of those that must be absolutely transparent; however, in Nigeria, it is not so.
Opacity is allowed when majority of the people are not
knowledgeable enough to understand the strategic content of what the government
is doing like it is done in China where one-party state exist. Or, in places
where the populaces are greatly illiterates like the Sahel regions as event
elections are still opaque governance process as military impose forced
governance or the president use the military to suppress opposition.
Nigeria must not be like them as majority of Nigerians are
literate about election processes, and independent National Electoral
Commission (INEC) must spare Nigerians litigations that are outrightly
engineered by the commission. Youth Corpers, lecturers and professors who, all,
are research minded people involved in elections since 1999, ought to have been
submitting reports that ought to help in reducing litigations in Nigeria’s
elections. Objectivity, respect of processes, unbiased umpire, and outcomes
that must be seen as carried out by such people should be the norm.
So, how could INEC ever convince Nigerians that about 0.5 Trillion
was spend in conducting Nigerian election, and the basic test of why it must not
incur judicial cost failed? Beyond the INEC Federal budget of over $350
billion, there are additional local costs, which one witnessed in the location
I participated as a local umpire, though INEC refused to pay me any honorarium
till the writing of this piece including the local incentives derive le. Count
also the man-hour lost by Nigerians over 90 million employable Nigerians who
had to spend days seeking to cast their votes and those who boycotted it but
must remain indoor. If the average worth of a Nigerian GDP-wise is $2500 hence
$7 per day, it means $630 million was lost every day election was conducted on
Nigeria space.
So INEC had caused Nigeria to lose over N1 trillion for the two
days of presidential and gubernatorial elections notwithstanding the
appropriated sum it took.
So, where else to look for “419” activity if not in INEC and, what
is more, I was surprised to observe that the BVAS and whatever joined it, came
from just a given room address in an obscure town in China.
It is obvious that an elementary exercise like election placing
great burden on Nigeria like it did, smarks of deliberate intention to make it
opaque and for it to lack transparency as the first thing – polling booth
result could not be assured of fraud free.
Indeed it is an indication on anyone that participated in the
election and required great research input to see that it does not occur again
just like the late President Yar’Adua observed, even as the beneficiary of such
fraudulent exercise.
So, the in-coming President should assure the world – UN, EU,
AU, ECOWAS observers who spend their man-hours intellect and finance thinking
it could be transparent to expect an improved electoral process next time.
It is not a rocket science for God’s sake. The trajectory of
results, starting from polling booths, through wards’ collection centers to
local government collation to state collation centers are all dependent on the
first level, polling booths and the BVAS and the IREV were meant to serve as
“Primary Book of Entry” never to be faulted. Hellas, it failed.
Nobody
is sure what happened till now, whether hacking, failure of technology or
deliberate manipulation. In all, however, for the fact that the tools came from
China, it is obvious that the “Architecture” of the electoral process is within
the designer’s reach to make or mar, and it is beyond INEC. However, it is not
an excuse for lack of expected intellectual surveillance from INEC.
This is where what happened in Abia state and Adamawa state ought
to have happened at the Federal level; seven days interim to correct anomalies
or to conduct run-offs in some areas.
It could have been more transparent than opaque as it is seen now. APC could
have still won or not.
As it stands now, the discrepancy between what happened at the
first election of Federal Constituency and the second of state constituency
givens an impression of a great opaque maneuver comparable to magic performance
of lynching people in Nigeria claiming that someone touched someone and removed
his manhood.
It can only happened in Nigeria without transparently know sex
replacement surgery like the one the son of Sade Adu went through to become a
female.
So why should INEC not be called to account effectively for what
happened to avoid travesty of justice?
*Ariole is Professor of French and Francophone Studies, University of Lagos.
No comments:
Post a Comment