By Alfred
P. B. Kiadii
No
victory is worth winning without a bit of sacrifice or suffering. So we accept
the evolving processes in the Homeland, as we prepare ourselves for the task of
nation-building. The vulgar minds suppose we are wishful thinkers, but beyond
their noses and the abstraction of common sense they understand not complicated
processes and see not the simmering contradictions, driven by molecular
movement that lies beneath the surface. Such sterility preclude them from
understanding that under certain conditions everything changes into its
opposite.
*President George Weah of Liberia |
The regime
is clueless. There seems no solution on the horizon. The President meanders. He
dabbles in convoluted rhetoric. The regime seems indifferent. The nation is on
the edge of a precipice. There bubble may burst unexpectedly.
In the
midst of these catastrophes, the rush to build exotic places is high. The
President leads the way with the simultaneous construction of three houses at
separate localities in Monrovia and parts adjacent, followed by the his Minister
of State for Presidential Affairs, who has bought a palace which overlooks a
squalid community. The scramble for private property and material display is on
the increase. The jostling is like the last rush, everyone wants to get a piece
of the pile. The rapidity of such plunder is akin to the invasion of the
Barbarians during the decline of the Roman Empire .
All
standards have been violated. Anarchy is the new normal. The Public Procurement
Concession Commission (PPCC) is a dead wood. The General Auditing Commission
(GAC) is an excrescence. The Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (PPCC) is in
total ferment, and looks like an anomaly. Asset declaration is like a heresy.
The act of the Liberia Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (LEITI) has
been brutally violated. The Constitution has been dishonored. The influenza is
ubiquitous.
Every
symptom of a failure state is rearing its ugly head. The Rule of law is being
replaced by the imperial presidency. The nation is like a cesspool. The social
rot has forced elements to turning to crime out of sheer desperation. The crime
rate in Monrovia
is on a sudden increase. Even the US
embassy near Monrovia
has cautioned its citizens to take the necessary precaution.
The
government is destitute of knowledge. It is impervious to logic. It is at best
a ‘basket of deplorables.’ There is no agenda. The country is in a state of
nature. Nobody seems to be in charge. The regime is now a national disgrace. A
laughing stock and pathetic joke. Blunder galore!
The black
hole in the current budget; the building of exotic mansions; the refusal to
conduct the by-elections are not disconnected happenings. Obviously, only a
mind with an insight of the dialectic will understand that these are massive
contradictions that reveal the total breakdown of governance in the homeland,
which must be understood based on the interconnections of the occurrences. In
fact, they are symptoms of greater chaos hovering over the nation. Of course,
as the process unfolds, driven by inner contradictions, there can be no
plausible conclusions.
Besides,
these contradictions are at best necessary so that the people who voted George
M. Weah can realize in politics we don’t look at good intentions.
Unconsciously, the Weah regime will set the stage for the resuscitation of left
politics in the Homeland. By left politics we are intimidating the blunders
from the Weah regime will provide the powder keg for the ascent of a
working-class leader. In the last analysis, we stressed that with the failed
experiment of the neoliberal Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, succeeded by the vain
populist Weah, the politics of the Homeland ought to drift to the left.
By this we
are not also saying left politics will dominate the political sphere of the
Homeland without a bit of struggle or sacrifice. Neither are we equally saying
that without a thorough work among the exploited layers of the people by a
revolutionary organization, the left will be gifted the space to operate. It is
pivotal to note that no ruling class in its most rotten stage ever willingly
let go its privileges without a bit of ferocious struggle. The left will only
succeed when it approaches the ideological struggle with utmost seriousness and
correct tactic.
Until the
working mass can form a viable revolutionary organization, it remains a class
‘in itself.’ Yes, they are in the majority, but a majority without a proper
organization to direct the struggle is at best a minority. With the
revolutionary organization to lead the march for socialist transformation, the
potency of the exploited layers will change from a class ‘in itself’ to a class
‘for itself.’ Simply, the revolutionary organization becomes the qualitative
leap, which carries with it the correct tactic to lead the struggle.
Whether
you like it all not, the Sirleaf government was a qualitative leap from
backwardness to a bit of progress. Her genius lies in the fact that she
attracted foreign direct investment to the Republic in the tune of US$ 16
billion. She ensured that freedom of speech, amid little excesses, were guaranteed.
She ensured that activities of the government became decentralized to the
countryside. Under her reign, although the educational sector was challenged, a
lot of children got enrolled in school. Universities put out thousands of
students.
Notwithstanding,
the regime had colossal excesses which angered the people against it.
Corruption became widespread and unbridled. Nepotism was rampant and
pernicious. While there was an accumulation of wealth through outrageous
plunder on an industrial scale by her officials, on the other hand, equally,
there was an accumulation of mystery and poverty by the people. Such Insoluble
contradiction, with the resumption of activities in the mining, agriculture
sectors, led to the upsurge in the consciousness of the people. Hence, without
wanting to argue the election was rigged, her Vice President was rejected by
the people.
In
history, as in life, when a particular social system reaches the point of
terminal decline, it is no longer progressive. This period gives rise to the
emergence of woeful elements. The Weah ascent and all ascents of broken
historical figures must be understood in this context. For instance, when the
German society imploded, Adolf Hitler emerged. This holds true for Benito
Mussolini of Italy ; General
Francisco Franco of Spain ;
Antonio de Oliveira Salazar of Portugal
et. Al.
Thus, the Weah leadership is a historical necessity which has been expressed
through an accident. However, it is important to underscore that others would
argue that the negation of the negation indicates that from a lower stage a
phenomenon is transformed into another but at a higher stage. Such assertion
must be accepted but with a sharp proviso, or one misses the full
conceptualization of the negation. It is indicated that under certain condition
qualitative change changes into quantitative outcome. For instance, a bag of
pure water at a certain temperature in the refrigerator turns into a solid
(qualitative change). Conversely, under certain condition when it is at room
temperature, it turns into liquid. (Quantitative change). In other words,
history doesn’t operate on a linear trajectory. There are forward progressions
as well as backward declinations.
Sometimes
in history when the masses cry for a leader, it is only but proper they have
that leader. It is necessary for a bankrupt regime to take power so that the
people get increasingly frustrated with its blunder. Hence, they sever ties
with it and join a more progressive organization. It is said in the Christian
Bible when the children of Israel
cried for a king, God gave them one. Afterwards, the same people pleaded with
God to take the king away.
Fast
forward, Weah winning the presidency of Liberia in the short run was wrong,
but from a dialectical perspective the presidency is a poisoned chalice
bequeathed to him. He carries in himself his own seed of destruction. As his
massive failure will lead to the people who have this illusion of grandeur in
him about transforming the country to have a second thought.
In spite
of this, it is necessary to underscore that this will not happen by the
enlightened elements in the Homeland folding their hands. While backlash from
big events will spur the consciousness of the people, a revolutionary
organization with a clear programme must commence massive propaganda, agitation
and mobilization among the working mass and enlightened layers of the Republic.
Marx through his profound study of theory calls it the class struggle. It is
only through the class struggle under the banner of a revolutionary
organization with a clear programme that the people can stampede into history.
In the
coming days, if it is not already the case, the confidence of the most senior
elements of the Liberian ruling class will dwindle significantly. It will then
manifest itself into a split. This split will prove decisive for the
advancement of the cause, as a social revolution is hasten when there is a
split in the ruling class.
Meanwhile,
a more revolutionary organization with a clear prograammes must commence active
work among the working mass of the people and the enlightened students across
various universities. By revolutionary organization this writer doesn’t mean
any organization which dabbles in slogans and title-tattles
Hence, on
this matter of revolutionary theory, we ask Vladimir Lenin to speak: “Without a
revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement.”
Of course,
in such a time various organizations will come with pretenses. However, it is
important to note that some are either intoxicated with vendetta or others are
purely antiestablishment. These petty bourgeois radicals, bar room socialists
are needed in the struggle to put pressure on the regime. To make the mistake
that they can lead any serious struggle for transformation will be a childish
blunder. Spewing revolutionary slogans or talking big doesn’t mean they can
ignite any change. History reminds us that the CDC took similar path, but here
we are with their floundering performance.
A formal
alliance of the working mass and the students led in the vanguard by a
revolutionary organization ought to be struck. However, we are quite aware that
leading elements of the organized student movement in the Homeland are in a
marriage of convenience with the Liberian ruling class. To think that an
infiltration of these organized organizations will keep the students docile
then they have not understood history.
History
reminds us that wherever reactionary regimes capture the organized student
movement and youth organizations, new forces emerge because nature doesn’t
permit a vacuum. It is in this context that radical students organized under
the banner of the South African Student Organization (SASO) came forward to
take the struggle to a logical conclusion when the National Union of South African
Students (NUSAS) became extremely reactionary and rotten to the core.
Under such
a condition the hirelings and lackeys of the Weah regime could easily retort
that there is no rise in the tide of revolutionary consciousness among the
people. As such, Weah will serve two terms because former President Sirleaf did
so. To them we argue that how come William V.S. Tubman spent 27 years in power,
but William R. Tolbert didn’t go twelfth years. Furthermore, we ask them how
come Mele Zenawi spent seventeen years as Prime Minister of Ethiopia, but
Hailemariam Desalegn lasted for only six years. In short, an understanding of
different epoch in the context of time and space will liberate them from such
folly.
Poverty
was not ordained by God. It was created by man and is the consequences of
unequal distribution of the common wealth. To abolish such scourge, man must
put his life on the line to struggle against it.
In the
celebrated words of Rosa Luxembourg, Liberia faces two options:
‘Socialism or barbarism—there is no third way.’
Kiadii studies
Political Science with emphasis in Public Administration at the University of Liberia . He is the Secretary General of
the Movement for Social Democratic Alternative (MOSODA). You can reach him
through Cell#: +233552176627, or bokiadii@gmail.com .
No comments:
Post a Comment