By Chuks Iloegbunam
We must invite Hon. Yakubu Dogara, the Speaker
of the House of Representatives, to come to our immediate assistance. On
Thursday June 9, 2016, Mr. James F. Entwistle, the United States Ambassador to Nigeria ,
petitioned Speaker Dogara, accusing three members of the lower chamber of the
National Assembly of improper conduct, attempted rape and soliciting for
prostitutes while participating in a political programme in America .
*Buhari |
The following is a part of the Ambassador’s
petition: “It is with regret that I must bring to your attention the following
situation. Ten members of the Nigerian National Assembly travelled to Cleveland , Ohio ,
as participants in the International Visitor Leadership Programme on good
governance. We received troubling allegations regarding the behavior of three
members of the delegation to the U.S. Government’s flagship professional
exchange programme.
“The U.S. mission
took pains to confirm these allegations and the identities of the individuals
with the employees of the hotel in Cleveland . “The conduct
described above left a very negative impression of Nigeria, casting a shadow on
Nigeria’s National Assembly, the International Visitor Leadership Program, and
to the American hosts’ impression of Nigeria as a whole. Such conduct could
affect some participants’ ability to travel to the United States in the future.”
The Ambassador requested “in the strongest
possible terms” that the Speaker should share his government’s apprehension
with the National Assembly so that the members will understand the “potential
consequences” of their actions. The Ambassador had acted appropriately. As was
to be expected, the matter sacked every other topic in the Nigerian media,
orthodox and social. Calls sprang from the four corners asking for the heads of
the accused legislators. Some, more merciful, demanded their imprisonment or,
at the very least, their letters of resignation. It was at this point of
cacophony that Speaker Dogara stepped in with a dose of fresh air. He called
the American Ambassador’s petition by its real name, which is Allegations. And
he tweeted severally: “He who alleges must prove. That’s the law. As we speak,
no evidence has been put forward other than the letter sent to my office and
copied to many others.”
“Together with the US Embassy in Nigeria we will get to the bottom of this
matter and until then let’s not be judgmental.” “Under our laws, an accused
person is deemed innocent until proven guilty and he enjoys the benefit of any
doubt.” “Social media trial and conviction of members alleged to have committed
the offence is taking up arms against our laws.” It was difficult to believe
that Speaker Dogara had tweeted as reported, especially as commentators
appeared to have missed the import of the pronouncements credited to him. What
the reported tweets scream with uncommon eloquence is an indictment of the
Nigerian government, for not following due process in its vaunted
anti-corruption war.
This will be addressed shortly. But, first, an
examination of related issues. Ambassador Entwistle’s petition was not written
in his individuality. It was written in the name and on the authority of the
Government and the peoples of the United States of America .
This underscores the petition’s gravity. There are two questions to ask here.
One, would the US allow the laisser-faire attitude common to these parts to
undermine the credibility of its top envoy in Abuja, by watching gleefully as
this critical matter gets buried in the womb of time? Two, if the Americans
offer every assistance to get to the “bottom of this matter,” would Speaker
Dogara’s promise, made on behalf of the House of Representatives, to unearth
the truth be redeemed?
Or would it turn out that he had only spoken to
douse excited indignation? Fears that this matter will soon disappear cannot be
easily dismissed. During February, a video went virile on the Internet showing
a female Army officer and two soldiers brutalising a poor, defenceless
civilian, slapping him more than 40 times, inflicting karate chops on the nape
of his neck, kicking him in the area of the groin, washing him down with a
torrent of caustic insults, and compelling him to wipe the blood oozing from
his ruptured facial organs with his shirt, simply for the alleged offence of
calling the officer “beautiful”.
Five months later, not a word has been heard on
the investigation promised by the military. The Halliburton bribery scandal has
refused to go away. But it is not being investigated at the Nigerian end,
despite America ’s
abiding encouragement to that end. Instead it has been devalued to a joke on
the ownership of the initials AMB. The petitions filed last year against two
serving Ministers, one of which was the outcome of a judicial inquiry, have continued
to gather dust on the shelves of the EFCC. The authenticity question regarding
the presidential school certificate managed to be asked at the High Court. But
a judicial order of indefinite adjournment suddenly bludgeoned it. Above all
else, corruption allegations have surfaced against the Chief of Army Staff.
Evidence is everywhere that the man bought up
property in Dubai . Did the purchase funds come from his
legitimate earnings or from other sources? This case is crucial because it
concerns the embodiment of the Army’s morale and integrity. Further, it has to
do with the man whose way the Army said was blocked, and on the strength of
which hundreds of Shiites were mown down with gunfire and their estates razed
to the ground. By the way, the murder of the Shiite hundreds happened six
months ago. Yet, no word is today being heard about the work of the tribunal of
inquiry ostensibly investigating it. Why is it that, in all these examples and
in many more, Abuja is
not applying Speaker Dogara’s cited dogma on judicial process?
The following comes from Corruption and the
Rules of Engagement, an article I published last December: “Unfortunately, the
President’s anti-corruption rhetoric, and the manner his government is
prosecuting the war points to duplicity. This is because the fight against
entrenched corruption cannot succeed unless it is systematised. But Buhari’s
anti-corruption war is bereft of system. It is selective. It is running on the
wheels of media hysteria. It is unconcerned with preventive measures. It is
overloaded with censure and sanction. It is, therefore, bound to end in tragic
failure.” The way things stand, there is no doubt that the country is currently
entrapped in the barber’s chair, whirling – a transfixed object perpetually in motion
but incapable of advancing from any one point to another.
Thirty years ago messiah had turned up in
military fatigues, complete with medals and epaulettes, marching in circles.
After a three-decade interregnum of costly hairsplitting, messiah staged a
comeback garbed in embroidered, civilian robes, walking in circles.
*Mr. Chuks Iloegbunam, an author, wrote from Lagos .
No comments:
Post a Comment