*President Museveni |
By Alexander Opicho
Observing the 2016 general elections inUganda brings
to the surface a strong controversy between political science and governance as
social practices. The contest that was between Museveni and the two veteran
opposition politicians, Kizza Besigye and Mbabazi has been concluded with
violence and strong possibilities of future violence, in spite of the fact that
it has left Museven as the winner to his now seventh term as the president of
Uganda or his 31st year as the president of Uganda.
This has happened on the backdrop of age-long heavy poverty, abuse of human rights, joblessness and despair, tormenting fear, squalorism, shameful diseases like leprosy, punctured education system, palpable police brutality and hostility, corruption, brotherism, oppression of the press and rights to freedom of the speech as well as irritating culture of political falstaffity by President Museven as the day to day experience of the people of Uganda. What I mean is observing politics inUganda will
lead you to nothing else but to a conclusion that democracy is a beautiful
paralysis of human hope beyond any diagnosis known to mankind today and
tomorrow.
To be concise Museveni might have won the presidential elections or maybe he has not won, that is not the problem; the issue is how Museveni monkey-wrenched the entire electoral process by using police and military brutality to destroy all the fairness in the election process. Those that watched or saw Museveni using military power to terrorize and humiliate his key opponent Dr Kizza Besigye will be activated mentally to remember the former military dictators that extremely employed armies in police uniforms to mayhem the unarmed civilians, I mean to remember the likes of San Abacha of Nigeria, Arap Moi of Kenya and Idi Amin Dada of Uganda.
Dr. Kizza Besigye
In contrast to the tempo of the moment where the world society emotionally empathizes with the people ofUganda , political scientists are
observing different lessons from the experience. In theory of politics and
power management, Museven is a perfect example of political realism. Political
thinkers in the school of realism like Thomas Hobbes, Niccollo Machiavelli and
Dr. Spengler would readily find a role model in the person of Yoweri Museven as
a paragon of politics and its practice. Violence is one of the means you use to
capture power and maintain power, given the available convenience in practice
of politics that the end justifies the means. Intellectual power, religious
power and soft power like the ones used by Museveni’s opponents are also tools
of achieving and maintaining political power, but unfortunately they are not
effective enough as actions plans for the achievement of the goal of contested
political power. Mbabazi and Besigye needed stronger economic power and
physical tyranny to counter Museveni. In this situation therefore a keen
political scientist would find most of those opposed to Museveni to be
suffering from a vice whose syndrome is basically political illiteracy and
political callousness of a sorriest order.
Mbabazi and Besigye were supposed to have guns as an imperative reinforcement to their brawn power, and votes as well as some money. It was political tomfoolery for Besigye and Mbabazi to be divided among themselves yet they were aware that they are competing against a shrewd and gifted Machiavellian cum seasoned guerrilla warrior of the bourgeoisie order like Yoweri Museveni.
Some few days to the election date, Museveni launched one of his books, Sowing the Mustard Seed, as part of his campaign strategies. This is not a new book, he wrote it ten years ago as essays explaining the ideology that can bring political stability inUganda . The
book is nothing else other than defective application of Marxist ideology to
justify selfish socialism which Karl Marx himself described as prosaic
socialism of the Blanguist school. It is the same literary position Museveni suffered
in another book, Museveni’s Long Match, obviously borrowed from Mao Tse Tung use
of language in the Selected Works. Both books show Museveni as a
self-congratulatory intellectual with poor academic background trying to hide
his illiteracy behind ideological miracles, the same way Malcolm X and Adolf
Hitler did through their stunning auto-biographies.
The technical truth is that Museveni is only applying Machiavellian tactics by dissembling, scaring and intimidating the people ofUganda
into subjection to his oppressive political power. However in practice, Museveni does not have the military muscle now
to counter an insurrection in Uganda
if it occurred today. He will be ejected out of power in the style of the North
African springs that saw Gaddafi and Mubarak out of power.
The opportunity is that Museveni has concentrated the army jobs to his brothers from Banyonkole clan in Mbarara district, he has left out the majority from Gishu, Baganda and Ateso to wallow in the mire of poverty and economic estrangement. He has economically and intellectually paralyzed the Luos fromNorthern Uganda where Okot P’
Bitek was born, by funding Joseph Kone to perpetrate state terrorism there on
this Luo communities. Thus the Ugandan Army is the most detested army by the
civilians of all of the armies in East Africa .
The fact is that Museveni has over-applied political realism until now; it now looks like political thuggery. It is not logical in the post modern world to use the brute power of the gun so that you hang on a rotten throne of oligarchical juntaism for over thirty years without any reason for the same, only that you are preparing your son to be your successor. Such unconstitutional reign or even sometimes such constitutional tyranny invites nothing but a justification of armed violence by the oppressed people as they would be tired of begging for freedom from a political megalomaniac who does not have ears to listen to the out-cry of the people but instead he puts on deliberate blinkers to the political open sore gang erroneously eating into social and economic flesh of the same people.
Alexander Khamala Opicho,
Lodwar ,
Kenya
Observing the 2016 general elections in
This has happened on the backdrop of age-long heavy poverty, abuse of human rights, joblessness and despair, tormenting fear, squalorism, shameful diseases like leprosy, punctured education system, palpable police brutality and hostility, corruption, brotherism, oppression of the press and rights to freedom of the speech as well as irritating culture of political falstaffity by President Museven as the day to day experience of the people of Uganda. What I mean is observing politics in
To be concise Museveni might have won the presidential elections or maybe he has not won, that is not the problem; the issue is how Museveni monkey-wrenched the entire electoral process by using police and military brutality to destroy all the fairness in the election process. Those that watched or saw Museveni using military power to terrorize and humiliate his key opponent Dr Kizza Besigye will be activated mentally to remember the former military dictators that extremely employed armies in police uniforms to mayhem the unarmed civilians, I mean to remember the likes of San Abacha of Nigeria, Arap Moi of Kenya and Idi Amin Dada of Uganda.
Dr. Kizza Besigye
In contrast to the tempo of the moment where the world society emotionally empathizes with the people of
Mbabazi and Besigye were supposed to have guns as an imperative reinforcement to their brawn power, and votes as well as some money. It was political tomfoolery for Besigye and Mbabazi to be divided among themselves yet they were aware that they are competing against a shrewd and gifted Machiavellian cum seasoned guerrilla warrior of the bourgeoisie order like Yoweri Museveni.
Some few days to the election date, Museveni launched one of his books, Sowing the Mustard Seed, as part of his campaign strategies. This is not a new book, he wrote it ten years ago as essays explaining the ideology that can bring political stability in
The technical truth is that Museveni is only applying Machiavellian tactics by dissembling, scaring and intimidating the people of
The opportunity is that Museveni has concentrated the army jobs to his brothers from Banyonkole clan in Mbarara district, he has left out the majority from Gishu, Baganda and Ateso to wallow in the mire of poverty and economic estrangement. He has economically and intellectually paralyzed the Luos from
The fact is that Museveni has over-applied political realism until now; it now looks like political thuggery. It is not logical in the post modern world to use the brute power of the gun so that you hang on a rotten throne of oligarchical juntaism for over thirty years without any reason for the same, only that you are preparing your son to be your successor. Such unconstitutional reign or even sometimes such constitutional tyranny invites nothing but a justification of armed violence by the oppressed people as they would be tired of begging for freedom from a political megalomaniac who does not have ears to listen to the out-cry of the people but instead he puts on deliberate blinkers to the political open sore gang erroneously eating into social and economic flesh of the same people.
Alexander Khamala Opicho,
No comments:
Post a Comment