By Ray Ekpu
It was on May 30, 1967
that Col. Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, the military governor of Eastern Nigeria,
declared that region the Republic
of Biafra . A few weeks
later, Col. Yakubu Gowon, Nigeria ’s
head of state, declared war on the secessionist territory. The war dragged on
for 30 horror-filled months until the Biafrans threw in the towel in January
1970. Gowon announced a three-point programme of Reconciliation, Rehabilitation
and Reconstruction. A few days ago, Biafra became 50 and was marked with a
solemn seminar titled “Memory and
Nation-building: Biafra 50 Years After.”
It was well attended: Olusegun Obasanjo who commanded troops in that war and
later on became head of state and President of Nigeria; Prof. Yemi Osinbajo who
was in primary school then but is now the Acting President of Nigeria; Ahmed
Joda who was one of Gowon’s super permanent secretaries at the time. He headed
the Muhammadu Buhari transition committee in 2015. John Nnia Nwodo, the
President of Ohaneze Ndigbo, a former minister of Information and a scion of
the famous Nwodo family; Professor Ebere Onwudiwe, a well-known political
scientist and public intellectual.
There were several others, most of them young
Igbo intellectuals who were probably not born during the war. There was nothing
substantial or divergent to be expected from a group like that. It was largely
a gathering to do some introspection on the lessons of the war and why Biafra as an idea has not gone away. It was an exercise
in admonition and not quite a forum for soul searching. But it was worth it
because since the end of the war things have not moved swimmingly either for
the Igbos or for Nigeria .
There have been renewed agitations for the actualisation of Biafra
as a republic. The agitators have been harassed and detained by security
agencies but there is no let-up in the agitation.
Today’s Biafra is a lingering echo of the
Biafra of 1967 and of the fact that many years down the road many Nigerians
feel excluded from Nigeria’s dinner table which means that we have not been
able to build an inclusive, consensual union that caters for all interests
fairly, equitably, and in a fashion that is not perceived as discriminatory and
sectional. When the Federal Government sites amenities and makes appointments
in a manner that is nakedly discriminatory then that is the real spelling of
exclusionism. Exclusionism is a reflection of bias and lack of trust which
leads in turn to reciprocal bias and lack of trust. That is not bridge
building, not nation-building.
When Gideon Orkar did
his coup some years ago against the Ibrahim Babangida government he said he was
carving some states out of Nigeria .
Such an attempt at fissure was a product of accumulated frustration with the
state of the union. Since then not much has been done by elected politicians at
the Centre to give a new and sincere approach to nation-building and
inclusiveness as articles of faith.