By Paul Onomuakpokpo
Lest we
miss a vital opportunity to reflect on the anti-corruption campaign, we must
put the positions of Senate President Bukola Saraki
and House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara on the inveterate plague in
the proper perspective. It serves no good to the anti-corruption campaign and
the nation’s development in the long run for their views to be dismissed in a
huff simply because of a phalanx of allegations that have portrayed the duo and
other members of the National Assembly as not immune from corruption.
Saraki is facing prosecution at the Code of
Conduct Tribunal (CCT) for corruption. The citizens are riled by other
senators’ apparent complicity in the alleged sleaze of their leader because
they have waited in vain for the lawmakers to evince a sense of moral repulsion
against identifying with him whenever he goes to the tribunal or court over his
case. Underpinning the outrage is that if they were not as corrupt as their
leader why should they even allow him to preside over the affairs of the upper
legislative chamber? Why not replace him and avoid him like a plague as long as
the trial lasts? Also, Dogara has been accused of budget padding, a brand of
corruption that reportedly entails the manipulation of a fiscal plan to the
detriment of the wellbeing of the bulk of the citizens. But unlike the case of
Saraki, the allegation of corruption against Dogara seems to be escaping from
public consciousness.
Dogara and his colleagues have been able to
squelch and banish the ex-chairman of the House of Representatives
Appropriation Committee, Abdulmumin Jibrin, who made the allegation against him
into political wilderness where he now flails, flounders and screams, striving
to draw the citizens’ attention to the corruption in the lower legislative
chamber. But nobody seems to hear him.