By IkeChukwu U. Unegbe
It was the usual jocularly greeting and exchange of banters with this my friend (name withheld) recently; followed with “O, boy, hope you are seeing the political campaigns and issues in our country?” It was meant both as a question and an open ended comment. My friend then responded: “Well, I am not involved, I don’t believe in democracy; it does not swing with the Will of The Almighty.”
We didn’t go into any further discussions on this occasion, as we just dispersed to our various other engagements for the day. But the response occupied my head, my mind and my thoughts; refusing to disappear. That discussion was before the 25th February, 2023 Presidential elections which were held all over Nigeria.
Soon after, the 25th February, 2023
presidential and national assembly elections occurred. The planning, execution
and collation of results threw up quite huge accusations and counter
accusations bordering on the integrity, impartiality and transparency of the
umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC. In the heat of
these accusations, INEC released the results, and announced a president-elect;
asking those accusing her of improprieties to “go to court”.
This
act was another rude shock to observers, since INEC’s conduct, impartiality and
integrity were being put to question. While all that was on, various video
clips emerged of alleged rigging at various polling centres, including INEC
officers allegedly openly confessing that they compromised the integrity of the
election. In her subtle acknowledgement of the lapses witnessed in the
elections, INEC later made a public statement accepting that it experienced
some technical glitches during the election, while assuring the populace that
it would investigate the allegations of malpractices and punish any INEC
officers found to have colluded with unscrupulous politicians to undermine the
integrity of the elections.
In effect, INEC was saying that it would do a self audit, but that
it should not matter to those who were not pleased with the conduct of the
elections, as those ones should go to court.
As expected, those on the side of the announced president-elect
candidate shouted in jubilation that ‘The Will of God has been fulfilled for
them”, and are daring anyone who cared to listen not to challenge ‘God’, by
attempting to question INEC’s verdict. In addition, press conferences were
convened, and tendentious explanations are put out to explain why the results
must be accepted, as “no election is perfect”, and “the BVAS machines used for
the elections may experience glitches, as every machine does experience
technical hiccups”.
Some even went as far as writing that in the entire history of the
country and democratic dispensation it had never happened that a presidential
election pronouncement was over-turned in any court. In addition, Nigerians
were being reminded that the candidate declared president-elect worked for it,
using his structures, and should not be denied the fruits of his efforts.
At this point, do not let us veer into the legal arguments, for or
against, since the matter is already before the appropriate court. Also, this
is not the moment to question whether INEC was complicit or not. It is also
very well in the rights of those in support of the declared president-elect to
put forward arguments to justify the outcome of the elections. Those crying
wolves are also in their rights to do so.
However, the effort here is simply to take a look at how human
beings generally view the Will of the Creator, and perceive its workings in
human affairs. Is there really any difference between God’s Will and man’s
will? Since man is in-charge of political arrangements on earth, could he
ascribe the outcome of his efforts to becoming the Will of God? In the midst of
the hullabaloo generated by the election, and positions taken by many,
according to their interests, this writer again remembered the discussions
referred to above. Is my friend then right in saying: ‘I do not believe in
democracy; it does not swing with the Will of The Almighty’? Perhaps, yes.
Ever
often, there is this blurriness of vision with respect to when God’s Will and
man’s will are at play in human affairs. Many have assumed that whatever
happens in human affairs or on earth is also, at same time, in accordance with
the Will of The Almighty. In fact this is given a fine tone with the acclaimed
statement: ‘Vox populi, Vox Dei’ which means ‘the voice of the people is the
voice of God’. This ‘voice of the people’ is assumed to be spoken during
democratic processes of an election. Can that be correct? Certainly, it cannot
be so.
As we are seeing already, many electoral choices are made on the basis of crude primordial sentiments bereft of sound objectivity. An abysmally poorly planned, executed and collated election processes, could never be taken as the ‘voice of the people’, not to talk of ‘voice of God’.
It must be
blasphemous to ascribe to The Almighty, in His Perfection and Justice, the
products of a caricature of electoral processes, conducted by fraudulently
compromised human beings. Such actions, processes, and the results arising from
them must remain the outcome of the ‘will of men’. That has been the fate of
any democratic arrangements anywhere in the world. Because man makes choices
based on short term selfish interests, most times, the outcome always brings
chaos and pain.
The Will of God reflects in the perfection we see in the
operations of the Laws of Creation. It flows through pure, transparent and just
channels, where human errors are totally avoided. God’s Will does not take into
cognizance men’s opinions and plots, but simply yield to the waves of higher
realities. An election fraught with irregularities would yield to the masses
the outcome of human will, whilst God’s Will will be far away from the people.
Yet, in reaping the consequences of their stubborn choices, men ultimately
fulfill God’s Will in that Spiritual Law that says: ‘What you sow you shall
reap.’
To
summarize it: God’s Will allows man to express his choices, including during an
election, no matter how poorly organized, but the outcome of that election must
remain purely human; and no attempt should be made to arrogate to it Divine
sanction. Men can choose leaders among themselves, but should never ascribe
their choice as one directed by The Almighty.
However, if men desire peace, happiness and harmony in their
affairs, they must seek to understand the Will of God, and strenuously align
their ways to accord with the dictates of the Divine Will. At a crude
electioneering level, it would require that the electoral umpire and the
players or participants embrace truthfulness, transparency, fairness, and
imbibe a sense of friendship or sportsmanship. Such a process would eschew
hatred, bitterness, evil manipulations and crude partisanship.
A winner in that process should recognize that he/she has
undertaken a spiritual oath to be fair and just, equally, to all. The process
that brings winners would recognize that rigging undermines its purity and
outcome.
So, yes, democracy is man’s will in desiring to govern human
affairs; but it should be for the period when man continues in his groping to
discover the Will of Almighty God.
*Unegbe, Esq. can be reached on ikeunegbe@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment