By Charles Okoh
Whoever
advised Governor Chukwuma Soludo on the path he has taken in his
unwarranted attack on the former governor of the state and presidential
candidate of the Labour Party, Mr. Peter Obi, has obviously and totally misled
him. If anything, his reaction was so infantile and lacking tact.
*Obi and Soludo
What would Soludo say was the reason he went overboard and
spewed all those bile when he is not contesting the position of the president?
Between Obi and APGA’s Prof. Peter Umeadi, who realistically has a better
chance?
After all said and done, Soludo ended up projecting the candidacy of both Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), than he has done for his party’s candidate (Umeadi).
Gov Soludo’s vituperation would have been better explained if he
had campaigned for his candidate and concentrated only on his party’s chances
rather than speak like a man who is preparing a way for future opportunities in
both the APC and PDP.
In concluding his diatribe Soludo had said, “Let me once again
wish my brother Peter Obi good luck. He should have fun and enjoy the fleeting
frenzy of the moment. But he must moderate the desperation as exhibited by his
social media mob. There is a limit to propaganda. A mob action often reflects
the character of its leader. No one has a monopoly of social media violence,
and no one should play God. Life won’t end by February/March 2023.”
Now, can Soludo justifiably say that he chose to reel out that bitterness because of the attack by Obi’s supporters? Is he also unmindful of the fact that some of those people he dismissed as mobs could be those who voted him to become governor? Is that a way of saying that Obi sanctioned or tacitly supports the action of his supporters?
If anything Soludo has simply
established that time-tested Holy Books saying in Matthew 12:34 that “Out of
the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” Here is Soludo’s logic: Because
he was attacked by Obi’s supporters for describing Obi’s investment in the
state as worthless, he then in turn decided to attack Obi, whom he claimed to
be his brother, in revenge.
Let us be clear on this issue. Abuses and
insults must not have any place in our politics going forward. The very essence
of the peace accord signed by politicians before going into political contest
is just so that they realise that individual ambitions must and should never be
equated with the life of any Nigerian. So, to the extent that Prof. Soludo was
attacked by some people must be condemned because people are entitled to their
personal views and such views must be respected.
That said, Soludo’s reaction too was absolutely unwarranted and
appears pre-meditated and it may not be out of place to say that it was driven
by selfish desire and jealousy. What did Soludo mean by saying no one should
play God? When Gov Soludo spoke with finality that Obi cannot win the 2023
elections, was he not playing God, as only God can tell the future? This is the
kind of bitterness that led Cain into taking the life of his brother, Abel,
again in the Holy Scriptures.
Soludo’s bloated ego was again exhibited when he said, “For
starters, Ohanaeze should study the report of my committee (planning and
strategy) in 2019. It may still be relevant today. Second, Ndigbo should
seriously study the MoU signed at the Yar’Adua Centre in 2010. The leader of
Igbo Political Association, Chief Simon Okeke and our members are still there.
Thirdly and for me, Ndigbo should strategize and bargain especially with the
TWO candidates likely to be president…”
“What would Zik of Africa or M.I. Okpara do in this
circumstance? Our founding fathers understood that in politics, you don’t get
what you deserve but what you bargain/negotiate, and you negotiate with your
organization and VOTES. Not social media militancy or bullying (where over 90%
of actual voters are not on social media)! Our fathers built alliances with
other major political parties in other regions (not with socio-cultural groups
that don’t command any votes), and Ndigbo were in the reckoning in the first
and second republics. After the elections, we will see how many votes any of
the leaders of the socio-cultural groups will get for Peter Obi from their
wards. Sometimes I even sense a conspiracy to nudge us on a path to nowhere
thereby further pushing us into irrelevance, and I pray that I am wrong. Just
my two cents!”
Again, Soludo’s failed attempt to pretend to be more concerned
about the plight of the Ndigbo in the politics of the nation is mere subterfuge
which also flies in the face of logic and sound reasoning. Is it wrong for Obi
to aspire to be president? Must the presidential candidates come from the north
and south west and the east left with the second fiddle role for Ndigbo to play
politics at the centre? If Soludo so cherish the pittance Ndigbo got in the
first and second republics, over 40 years ago, is he not embarrassed to think
that that is what Ndigbo deserve in 2023 and beyond? What is Obi’s guilt for
seeking that office? Must the south east be perpetually subjugated to the north
or other regions? By the way, has Obi not said it at every forum he has
appeared that he should not be voted for on the basis of where he is from or
what language he speaks?
The tragedy behind Soludo’s two cents admonition is that he is
even the one imputing tribalism to Obi’s aspiration, when he suggested that he
had advised Obi to seek the ticket of APGA, a party that is predominantly Igbo.
Is Soludo suggesting that Obi would have had a better chance with the APGA
ticket than that of the Labour Party? Those two other candidates (Tinubu and Atiku),
he suggested that Ndigbo should negotiate with are predominantly being
propelled by their ethnic groups and people.
Every politics is local, we are told, so there is nothing wrong
with Ndigbo projecting Obi as a worthy son. The question to be asked is: “Is
Obi acceptable to all other geo-political zones of the country?” If the answer
is yes, then let him try his luck. And let nobody begrudge him. It is this
ethnic politics being suggested by Soludo and his sympathisers that have
brought this conundrum on this nation.
In 1993 the whole nation voted for Moshood Abiola for president,
we were all not oblivious of the fact that he is a Yoruba man. Abiola’s
Muslim-Muslim ticket also amounted to nothing for Nigerians who voted
overwhelmingly for them. That same spirit which saw Nigerians vote for their
choice irrespective of where they are from or the religions they profess is
what we should encourage going forward, not the kind of politics Soludo seeks
to espouse.
From Soludo’s vituperation, it is obvious that the only sin Obi has committed is for daring to be president of Nigeria. Every Nigerian, irrespective of where he or she is from has the right to seek that office so long as he or she meets the requirement. It is no longer fashionable for a group, tribe or religion to monopolise that office. Nigeria belongs to all.
Today, Nigerians are holding political offices all around the world; Nigeria
must create that room for all to aspire to fulfill their ambition. What we seek
is a Nigeria that does not discriminate against tribe, religion or tongue, but
one where merit and only merit counts.
To further drive home that point that Soludo is blinded by envy or jealousy, hate or arrogance, he said; “Indeed, there is no credible pathway for him near the first two positions, and if care is not taken, he won’t even be near the third position.
Analysts tell him you don’t need ‘structure’ to
win. Fantasy! Of course, LP won governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun on
social media and via phantom polls, while getting barely 2,000 votes on ground.
Creating a credible third force for presidential election in Nigeria requires a
totally different strategy and extreme hard work.”
Was there any poll that suggested that LP’s governorship
candidates had any chance in Ekiti and Osun states? Was Obi on those ballots?
Soludo described those polls as phantom and not to be believed, yet he expects
people to believe his own polls, when he said, “Of course, Peter Obi will get
some votes, and may probably win in Anambra State — as ‘home boy.’” But Anambra
is not Nigeria. If he likes, I can even campaign for him but that won’t change
much. From internal state by state polling available to me, he was on course to
get 25% in 5 states as of August this year. The latest polling shows that it is
down to four states, and declining.”
I do not believe in opinion polls because clearly the hypothesis
which these polls are based are unreliable and cannot be trusted especially
when it has to do with elections where random sampling at city centres may not
reflect realities all across the nation, but it is laughable that the same
Soludo that dismissed others as phantom polls wants Nigerians to believe his as
authentic.
Soludo is an achiever and a success in all ramifications, but he
has continued to exhibit a bad trend that would not augur well for a man like
him with a bright political future. In his arrogance, he has had several spats
in the past with prominent Ndigbo ignoring the very same Ndigbo spirit he
pretends to now project, by recommending that Ndigbo align with those who have
also evolved simply by promoting clannish interests as well.
What Soludo has failed to realise is that Nigerians are yearning
for a president of their choice and that in making that choice tribe, religion
may not be major factors in determining that outcome.
While we await the second in the series of his epistles, he must
recognise that Obi’s reaction, so far, to his unprovoked attack has shown among
them the more matured.
Obi is eminently as qualified as Tinubu and Atiku and only the
people and not Soludo who only has one vote by the way, can determine who the
next president would be. Let them all go to the field and contest.
*Okoh is a commentator on public issues (charlesokoh126@yahoo.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment