By Anthony Igiehon
Ahead of the 58th
quadrennial United States presidential election on November 8, 2016, the world
watched with bated breath as the two major candidates in the election,
Republican Candidate Donald Trump and Democratic Candidate Hillary Clinton went
head to head at three separate debates held at New York’s Hofstra University
(September 26, 2016), Washington University in St. Louis (October 9, 2016), and
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (October 19, 2016).
For the two candidates who met the Commission on Presidential
Debates’ criteria for participation, the debates provided a
much-needed platform to present to the American voting public their plans or
reform proposals on a number of foreign and domestic issues.
*President Buhari |
Some of the key issues that came up at the
debates include US-Russia relations, the Syrian civil war, terrorism,
immigration, job creation, police conduct, race relations, Social Security,
taxation of the wealthy, the national debt, Iraq, the Affordable Care Act, the
Supreme Court, “uniting the country”, nuclear weapons, abortion, gun policy,
“birtherism”, jobs in the energy industry, cyberterrorism, and Islamophobia.
Questions were also raised about Trump’s taxes
and lewd leaked recording controversy, the Donald J. Trump Foundation,
Clinton’s emails, the Clinton Foundation, and a host of other issues personal
to the candidates but likely to have wider national impact. Even though the
debates were criticized for failing to address issues like climate change,
US-Cuba relations, US foreign policy on China, Africa, South America and Egypt,
among others, they, no doubt, gave the American voters an insight into each
candidate’s thoughts on sundry issues affecting America individually and in the
global context.
To what extent the debates influenced the
eventual outcome of the election is, however, a subject of further debate.
Though Hillary Clinton was considered to have won all three presidential
debates in opinion polls of likely voters, Donald Trump won the presidential
election of November 8. Yet, that does not in any way diminish the import of
the debates in the electoral process.
Clinton and Trump debated even though none of them was an incumbent president seeking re-election. Yet, on Sunday, January 20, 2019, Nigerians and the world watched with disappointment as the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) laboured to explain why Muhammadu Buhari, its presidential candidate who has been in power for over three and a half years, arrogantly absented himself from a presidential debate where he was expected to face the electorate and give account of his stewardship so far and seek their votes in next month’s polls.
Clinton and Trump debated even though none of them was an incumbent president seeking re-election. Yet, on Sunday, January 20, 2019, Nigerians and the world watched with disappointment as the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) laboured to explain why Muhammadu Buhari, its presidential candidate who has been in power for over three and a half years, arrogantly absented himself from a presidential debate where he was expected to face the electorate and give account of his stewardship so far and seek their votes in next month’s polls.
“Firstly, out of several opportunities afforded
our candidate to interact with the Nigerian people directly by different
organisations, our presidential candidate has taken full advantage of another
town-hall meeting organized by another group which held on Wednesday, January
16, 2019,” Festus Keyamo, spokesperson of the APC Presidential Campaign Council
(PCC), told Nigerians.
Keyamo added that the debate clashed with “the
busy and hectic official and campaign schedules of Mr. President”.
No sir, Mr. Keyamo.
First is that the date and time for the debate
were fixed long ago and the debate was well publicised; it didn’t come up as an
emergency. So the issue of a clash does not even arise.
Secondly,
the debate was not just one “out of several opportunities” afforded Buhari to
interact with the Nigerian people directly; it was the mother of all
opportunities. But, typical of them, Buhari and the APC bungled it, the same
way Buhari arrogantly avoids interviews with the Nigerian press but speaks with
the BBC in Hausa.
Come to think of it, what would Buhari tell
Nigerians about Boko Haram that he promised to decimate in six months but which
is still killing innocent Nigerians almost four years after? What would he tell
them about the economy that he promised to revamp but threw into recession,
leading to loss of millions of jobs and closure of hundreds of businesses? What
would he tell them about his so-called anti-corruption war when his own
government is mired in corruption? What would he say about the thousand killed
in Benue, Taraba, Nasarawa, Plateau in many parts of the country by marauding
herdsmen? So, it was convenient for him to stay away.
Those who say the People’s Democratic Party (PDP)
candidate should have stayed back to debate with the other three candidates on
the podium miss the point. As the PDP presidential candidate rightly explained,
it was to be “a presidential debate, not a candidacy debate”. A presidential
debate without an incumbent president seeking re-election is a child’s play and
no presidential candidate worth his or her onion would take part in it.
In any case, let’s not forget that in the American case cited
above, the Commission on Presidential Debates stipulated three criteria for
eligibility for the presidential debates: constitutional eligibility to serve
as president, appearance on enough ballots to potentially reach 270 electoral
votes, and an average of at least 15 percent on five selected national polls.
Whereas Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Gary
Johnson, and Jill Stein were on enough ballots to reach 270 electoral votes by
mid-September of 2016, only Clinton and Trump had reached the 15 percent
polling threshold. The truth is that if the same criteria were applied in the
Nigerian case, none of the three candidates on the podium last Sunday would
qualify for the presidential debate.
And this is not to denigrate the trio of Kingsley
Moghalu, Fela Durotoye and Oby Ezekwesili. These are fantastic individuals who
may also have fantastic ideas on how to get Nigeria out of the woods, but this
is politics where oratorical prowess alone can only earn you rounds of
applause, and applause does not win elections; votes do.
So clearly, the debate was going to be between
the two major candidates. Sentiments aside, every sincere Nigerian knows that
next month’s presidential election is between PDP’s Atiku Abubakar and APC’s
Muhammadu Buhari. And so, when Buhari arrogantly absents himself from the
debate – a fight, so to speak, in which he is the defending champion – asking
Atiku to stay back and debate is the height of insincerity.
*Igiebor is founder, Edo Forum
No comments:
Post a Comment