Until humanity blurs
the power distinction that privileges the leaders and afflicts the led with
misery, the magic for banishing strike would remain eternally elusive. Like in
most post-colonial states, the power relations in Nigeria have rendered the majority
of the citizens nugatory. The citizens’ input is not sought into how the
resources of the nation are shared. Even if it is sought, it is not reckoned
with when decisions are made.
This is why while the leaders have security,
the citizens are left at the mercy of marauders, kidnappers and armed robbers.
Again, the leaders can live in plenitude, thanks to the resources of the
society, while the other citizens go to bed on empty stomachs. Yet, when the
citizens say they are fed up, they are told not to complain.They are told that their complaining would ignite a crisis that could be hijacked by some political foes and that the path they must learn to maintain is that of acquiescence in their miserable state. Or are the citizens not being told to accept that they are fated to a life of misery when they are inveighed against for asking for a reasonable measure of a better life?
To be sure, the Nigerian leaders have only
replicated in themselves the colonial overlords who wanted a better life than
that of the colonised. It was such a deliberate socio-economic disparity that
provoked what is normally considered the first major strike in Nigeria in
1897. This was when workers resisted an attempt by the colonialists to cut
their pay in order to develop the then Lagos
colony. Since then, the Nigerian citizens have been using strike as a weapon to
bring the government to the path of sanity. Before the renascence of democracy
in the country, strike was used to make the military to do what was right. That
was when Frank Kokori became famous. He led a nationwide strike against the
military’s invalidation of the June 12, 1993 election. Through strike during
the government of Goodluck Jonathan, the citizens became aware of the humongous
corruption in the oil sector. The citizens were aware of how some people were
making billions simply because they were close to those in power.
It was the same government’s inability to anticipate and appropriately respond
to the needs of the citizens that triggered the recently suspended workers’
strike under the auspices of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) . Here were
workers who were being paid N18, 000 that was not even enough for them as fares
to their workplaces. When they resolved that they could no longer live a life
of misery occasioned by their poor wages, there were various attempts to
dissuade them from going on strike. They were accused of being unreasonable for
asking for pay rise when the country was just exiting recession. Nobody seemed
to appreciate their riposte that those in leadership did not live as if the
nation was just recovering from an economic crisis. They catalogued the
indicators of the leaders’ plenitude: fabulous salaries and allowances, among
others. Still, to discourage the workers, those in power and their cronies had
recourse to an economic theory that when the people are given more wages there
would be economic crisis: there would be inflation, employers would not employ
more persons, etc.
The government’s reluctance to pay was
manifested in its repudiation of an earlier agreement it reached with the
workers. Worse, when the workers decided to go on strike, the government went
to court to stop them. But the government grudgingly acceded to the demands of
the workers when it realised that their going on strike would unleash
calamitous consequences, especially in less than just two months before an
election year. What has happened has shown that measures, albeit insignificant,
to improve the welfare of the citizens can only be extracted from the
government through strike. Thus, the blame should go to the government and not
the workers for making strike an inevitable option for the citizens in asking
for an improvement in their wellbeing.
As if university teachers knew that the
workers would succeed, they began their strike a day before that of the NLC.
The university teachers are complaining about the government not honouring an
agreement for the release of more funds for the improvement of the university system
.Yet, there is the criticism that ASUU needed not go on strike. The university
teachers are told they are the intellectuals and that they should think outside
the strike box to bring new ideas as to how to improve their lot and that of
the university system. Like the workers under the aegis of the NLC, it is the
government that has encouraged the university teachers to always go on strike.
This is because whatever level of improvement the nation’s universities have
got is often credited to the strikes that lecturers have embarked on . But the
government that feels it knows so much would not bother about receiving advice
from university teachers. If successive governments have been listening to
suggestions, the nation would not be afflicted with its current crisis of
development. Consider: there has been advice on how to make the polity work
through restructuring and on how to develop the Niger Delta and stop the
restiveness of the region. But all this wise counsel has been ignored by
successive governments. Even when this current government in uncommon moments
of brilliance espouses some ideas on how to make things better, it does not have
the will to push through . This explains why when Vice President Yemi Osinbajo
asked that oil companies should relocate their headquarters to the Niger Delta,
his government did not have the will to translate this to reality.
There is the cynicism that lecturers do not
wholeheartedly discharge their responsibilities. The upshot, the charge goes,
is that they only succeed in producing graduates who cannot compete with their
counterparts from other parts of the world . Yet, we should only talk of the
lecturers not doing well after we have provided them what they need to function
effectively. It is only when this is done that we can have the right to
discipline those who grudgingly discharge their responsibilities.
Since it is clear that our politicians who
killed or lied about their certificates would rather steal money to settle
their political debts than serve the citizens, the latter would have no option
than to disrupt the system from time to time. With the increase of the minimum
wage to N30,000 that the NLC has achieved through its strike, a template for
getting a fair treatment from the government has been re-established. Rather
than living with the delusion that the citizens have to wait for four years
before they change their bad leaders, they can always exploit this weapon. Let
the citizens who do not want to embark on strike but choose to live with their
oppression not blame those who through it can get their dues.
Even beggars understand that strike is a great weapon of seeking redress at
their disposal. Aminata Sow Fall’s narrative rendition persuades us that
beggars can dictate how they should be treated, especially by their insensitive
and venal political leaders, if they have the courage to go on strike. Wives
who need more housekeeping allowance or are tired of domestic violence that is
now common nowadays can go on sex strike. Yes, there is also domestic violence
against husbands. But if they cannot also embark on sex or allowance strike,
they have themselves to blame as they remain seen as the agents provocateurs.
Unlike their Greek counterparts of 411 BCE,
21st century women have not understood the power of sex strike. Lysistrata ,
the eponymous heroine of the great Greek comic playwright, Aristophanes, fully
appreciated the power of sex strike many centuries ago . Lysistrata leads women
to embark on a sex strike in order to stop their battle-loving men from prosecuting
the Peloponnesian War between Greek cities. The grouse of the women is that in
such wars, it is their husbands and sons who are the victims. The baleful
consequences of the sex strike are men with painful erections that they cannot
hide from the women they beg for coital succour.
Since the nation’s leaders have consistently
demonstrated for over fifty years of post-colonial independence that they
cannot voluntarily improve the lot of the citizens, the latter should consider
strike as a means of reminding the former of the need to fulfill the
obligations of their high offices . Anything less than this would amount to a
willing acceptance of slavery in their own nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment