By Paul Onomuakpokpo
It is now over two weeks
since President Muhammadu Buhari ordered security operatives to arrest and
prosecute illegal arm-bearers. The president first gave the order towards the
end of last month during a National Security Council meeting attended by the
defence minister, the service chiefs, among others. He repeated the order when
he visited Nasarawa
State this month.
Here, we are confronted with two
possibilities. One is that the order has been fully complied with by security
operatives, leading to the mass arrest and prosecution of illegal arm-bearers.
The other is that the order has been completely disdained by security
operatives. Sadly, the second possibility is the reality today. Nothing
underscores this more than the fact that herdsmen who chiefly belong to the
category of illegal arm-bearers are still on the prowl despite the presidential
order. Indeed, the order has rather become a source of impetus to them to
illegally bear arms and use them to inflict pain and death on their victims. Since the order was given, there have not been
reports of security operatives arresting and prosecuting herdsmen for illegally
bearing arms. Rather, we have been inundated with reports of herdsmen
unleashing more violence in different parts of the country. The order has not
stopped herdsmen’s killings in
The president has demurred at the prospect of intervening in the crisis. Until
recently, there was neither a word of caution nor action that showed his
umbrage at the regular lunatic bouts of Fulani herdsmen. Therefore, we cannot
be easily discharged of the suspicion that the president himself did not mean
that the order should be executed when he gave it. As the chief patron of the
cattle rearers, he could just have issued the order to distract a traumatised
people from contemplating enduring solutions to the crisis spawned by herdsmen.
But if he meant it, it is not likely to be executed since the officials of
government who are supposed to do this have not hidden their sympathies for the
herdsmen. Besides, we live in a country with many presidencies, with Buhari
apparently heading the weakest of them.
In this case, the Inspector General of
Police, Idris Ibrahim, might have felt beholden to another presidency and not
that of Buhari when he dismissed the crisis as a communal misunderstanding that
did not demand the urgent attention of the Federal Government that the citizens
were asking for. This probably explained his refusal to relocate to Benue as directed by Buhari. And this also accounts for
the hubris he has demonstrated as he blamed Benue State Governor Samuel Ortom
for the inefficiency of the police he is supervising. Again, it was the defence
minister, Mansur Dan-Ali who declared that the killings were caused by herdsmen
because their grazing routes were blocked. As far as Dan-Ali is concerned, Nigeria is one
developmental backwater where there is no recourse to the law to seek redress.
No, the aggrieved party, especially when he is a herdsman, must administer
instant justice – by himself and through violence.
Thus, officials of government who are
afflicted with a paralysis induced by their alignment with the argument of the
herdsmen that they bear guns to defend themselves and their cows against
rustlers cannot execute Buhari’s order. But what they failed to add, and which
is clear to the discerning citizens, is that the guns are what the herdsmen use
to rape , maim and kill farmers who ask why their crops should be destroyed
because they must feed their cows. Consider the case of the Minister of
Agriculture and Rural Development, Audu Ogbeh, who at the weekend told visiting
Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello who has offered to accommodate herdsmen that
he asked the cattle rearers why they bear arms. Ogbeh said that their response
was that they use the guns for their own defence and that of their cattle.
The absence of a counter-logic from Ogbeh is
quite in sync with his sympathies for the herdsmen. After all, it was Ogbeh who
whined that the nation has not done as much for herdsmen as it has done to
incentivise owners of cassava farms. But Ogbeh and other government officials
who are aligned with the argument of the herdsmen must accept the imperative of
extending it . In other words, it is not only herdsmen who need guns to defend
themselves against human threats to their life and business. After all, life
has become so unsafe. There is no guarantee of protection from the state
security operatives. This is why there is a proliferation of crime manifested
in regular kidnapping, armed robbery, assassination, cultism, among others.
Therefore, in extending the logic of the herdsmen, all citizens should be
allowed to bear arms. After all, they are at the risk of being kidnapped,
robbed or murdered. Primary and secondary school pupils should be allowed to
bear arms since they stand the risk of being kidnapped and murdered by
ritualists who are chasing quick money. University students should be allowed
to bear arms on their campuses because they are faced with the danger of being
robbed and harassed. These arms would be very useful to the students in warding
off cultists who might want to kill, rape or force them to be members of their
nocturnal and blood-thirsty fraternities. University lecturers and medical
doctors have become some of the prime targets of kidnappers. They should
therefore be allowed to bear arms. To prevent journalists who are doing their
legitimate work from being harassed by security operatives, they should be allowed
to bear arms. The bus driver whom policemen are ready to shoot because he
refuses to be extorted of N100 should be allowed to bear arms to defend himself
against such mortal threats to his life and business. Not even the market woman
is immune from the pall of insecurity in the country. As she ekes out a living,
she is faced with the risk of being dispossessed of the proceeds of her sale of
vegetables. She should be allowed to bear arms to defend herself. The farmers
who are daily confronted with the prospect of being raped, maimed , killed and
having their crops eaten up by cows should be allowed to bear arms.
And since herdsmen now attack workers in their
offices as in the case of the local government area in Ondo State ,
all workers should be allowed to bear arms in their offices. And if the
infiltration of Aso Rock by Boko Haram members as alleged by former President
Goodluck Jonathan has not been stoped by Buhari despite his war on them in
Sambisa forest and his seeking $1 billion to finally defeat them, government
officials should sling Ak-47 rifles across their shoulders as they attend a
Federal Executive Council meeting. Since this is the situation that the
government wants, it should not talk of disbanding militias. The government
must not be bothered that they are bearing arms since they are being used to
defend themselves.
Yet, we must make allowances for the
possibility of altruism in Buhari’s order. He might not be disposed to creating
an atmosphere of anarchy where other citizens would be free to bear arms under
the guise of self-defence while herdsmen graduate into deploying rockets and
other weapons to demolish threats to themselves and their cows. In that case,
it needs to imbue the citizens with the confidence that it can make one law for
all. A law that forbids citizens from illegally bearing arms should not be
tweaked to allow herdsmen to violate it without baleful consequences. The
government should encourage an atmosphere of confidence in the state to protect
all citizens. It should ensure justice for those who have been wronged so that
they would not resort to self-help. And now is the time for it to signal its
readiness for this atmosphere with the arrest and prosecution of the
masterminds of the killings of over 73 citizens in Benue .
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is
on the Editorial Board of The Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment