By Nnedinso
Ogaziechi
The past two weeks came with a cocktail of events that made me both
proud on one hand and very sad on the other. As a proud alumnus of the
University of Ilorin, I was shocked that the University that had been flying
the country’s flag as one of the best in global rankings from Africa had
slipped down to number five in the National Universities Commission’s recently
released rankings.
On the other hand, I was over the moon that all the alumni scattered
across the globe are doing extremely well and are very concerned about the
progress in all spheres of life in
Then last week, two alumni of the University, a
royal father, Oba (Dr.) Michael Odunayo Ajayi, the Elerinmo of Erinmo, Ijesha
in Osun State and Nonye Adeniji organized a
well-attended Empowerment Programme Training Event for the Erinmo people.
Individuals left the training empowered with self-sustaining skills and start
off equipment. The sponsors and organizers are neither politicians nor prepared
to seek political offices. In a country, where politicians and political
aspirants invite and hug media klieg lights to publicize regular activities
that they not only owe the people but are paid to do so, these Unilorin alumni
and others not under reference here are doing their best to live out the true
promise of their humanity and learning.
Then last week, the Hijab controversy cropped up in the social
media. Another alumnus of the University, Miss Amasa Firdaus, was denied being
called to the Nigerian bar last week for refusing to remove her Hijab worn
under the wig. Her reason in her words: “My
major concern is the approval of Hijab so that every person coming behind me
will be able to use it for the call to bar (ceremony)”. She went to the
ceremony fully aware of the rules (written, spoken or inferred). “My demand is
that Hijab should be approved”, she concluded in defense of her action.
The controversy blew up a social media storm with varied opinions,
analysis and criticisms for and against her actions. The apex authority on the
Islamic religion in Nigeria ,
the Sultan of Sokoto, Dr. Mohammed Sa’ad Abubakr, has reacted saying that, “…Hijab
simply means decent dressing for Muslim women and was part and parcel of
Islam”.
The President of Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), A.B. Mahmoud,
promised that the matter would be addressed but cited the example of her
daughter called to the New York Bar wearing a Hijab. However, some lawyers
argue that the American and British legal systems are quite different.
Make no mistake about it, this writer is by no
means a lawyer and would not be in any position to talk on the legal semantics
involved in the dress code for a call to bar ceremony. However, it is important
for Nigerians to be sensitive to issues that divide people as North and South,
Christians and Muslims.
One does not need to be a Christian or Muslim to enjoy certain
privileges or obey certain laws in a secular state like Nigeria . The
issues of geography and creed are the most potent weapons of division in Nigeria and
every individual desirous of peace must do everything possible to engender
peaceful co-existence in the country.
The lady in question might mean well but she did not need the drama
which seems well rehearsed as in her own words, “…I knew this will happen”.
Before her, there had been many devout Muslims called to the decades-old
Nigerian Bar.
There is a ton of human rights issues for Muslim women: illiteracy,
child marriage, male violence (economic, sexual and physical), VVF infestation,
lack of reproductive health, the divorce system (Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido
Sanusi, decried the system in Nigeria and advocated the Malaysian module where
any divorced spouse gets half of the property), and lack of healthcare that
Miss Amasa can busy herself with. I do not think that a momentary removal of
Hijab for a secular programme would render her ‘indecently’ dressed to have
stirred so much division and controversy.
The eminent citizens that have taken a religious stand could have
tarried awhile to see how those in charge of the legal institution can handle
the matter amicably to avoid stoking any tension in a country that creed has
been a very divisive factor. My take is that even the NBA president spoke too
soon. Being a president does not mean you make or approve the laws. One would
have expected a little restraint while he tries to meet with his members to see
ways to resolve whatever problems exist bearing in mind the constitution and
secularity of the Nigerian state.
In a country with chronic selective amnesia and where people live
and die as Christians or Muslims, we have suddenly forgotten how Osun state
schools almost disintegrated into chaos when the same issue of a particular
religious dressing came up about two years ago. Traditional worshippers,
different denominations of the Christian faith decided in protest to dress
their children and wards to school in their various religious apparels in ways
that were as pedagogically destructive as it was disruptive.
The sense of nationhood ebbs away when we see ourselves as either
Christians or Muslims in a secular country. The irony is, there are Atheists,
pagans, traditional religionist, Buddhists, Zionists etc in this country and
they are as entitled to their rights as any other person. Nigeria would
be more progressive and worthy of patriotic embrace by citizens when we stop
saying things like, ‘ten Christians or ten Muslims died…’, Muslim North and
Christian South etc when there is an admixture of both and more everywhere.
Humanity comes first before religion and a country is as good as the
choice they make of these two cardinal human issues. Progress or lack of same
depends on the choice of each nation. Miss Amasa ought to have chosen a more
human progress-oriented battle in a country with one of the lowest human
development index in the world in 2017.
*Mrs. Ogaziechi is a
columnist with Daily Independent
newspaper
No comments:
Post a Comment