By Arthur Agwuncha Nwankwo
Given the renewed momentum and calls for the
restructuring of Nigeria ,
I am not surprised that it has dominated media headlines both in the one print and electronic media. Recently,
I was watching and listening to a programme where the discussants dwelt
extensively on the economy and what should be done. One thing that actually
interested me was the various suggestions made by the panelists on how to move Nigeria
out from the woods.
While the panellists were
unanimous in their agreement that the economy has collapsed almost
irretrievably, some of them recommended, as a way forward, that Nigerians
should go back to the farms; others agreed that there is urgent need to
restructure the country. Most of the discussants also dwelt extensively on the
importance of restructuring. Even Vice President Yemi Osibanjo called in to
make his position on restructuring known, though I find his explanation
vague.
But whether the Vice President agrees with
restructuring or not, my happiness is that many highly placed Nigerians, both
at home and in the Diaspora, who before now would hear nothing about
restructuring the country, have become fiery apostles of restructuring. I have
always known that we can never escape the route of restructuring because
history is coterminous with the reality that restructuring is the only escape
route for countries like Nigeria .
In the past 35 years I have maintained this position.
However, it does appear that even when
restructuring has become very trending today, many of the new apostles do not
understand the full import of restructuring. I want to say for the umpteenth
time, that what Nigeria
needs now is not a back-to-land initiative (that is good in itself) but an
urgent restructuring of the country. My worry actually, is the lackadaisical
understanding of this process of restructuring, even by those we may regard as
informed.
*Buhari |
There is one truth we cannot run away from. That
truth is that any society desirous of repositioning its economy must first of
all get its political structures right. Before the Mao revolution in China , the
Chinese economy was subject to so many shocks. Mao’s first major preoccupation
was to initiate far-reaching political restructuring of China . It was
this massive political restructuring that triggered the explosion of the
Chinese economy. The same is true of the Russian economy after the Bolshevik
revolution of 1917. Lee Kuan Yew is our modern example.
The point I am making
is that getting the politics right as a prelude to economic resurgimento is a
natural sequence of social growth. So I am scarcely surprised when one hears so
many people talking about stimulating economic growth in Nigeria ; yet
such people fail to appreciate the significance of political restructuring. My
conclusion on such occasion is that such people either do not understand the
correct meaning and import of political restructuring or they are simply not
being sincere to themselves. In real terms, the first step towards getting the
economy right hinges on a thorough-going and acceptable political restructuring
of Nigeria .
The significance of political structure came to the
fore at the time Barack Obama came into office as the US President.
Obama came to power at a point the US economy was in deep melt-down.
He did not go about bemoaning the errors and mistakes of the past Republican
administration of George Bush. He realized that his legacy in government would
be judged by how he confronted the economic challenges of the US . He relied
on a solid political structure that has been consolidated across time to
initiate far-reaching economic policies aimed at stimulating a collapsing
economy. Did he succeed? Yes! He did not only succeed but has taken the US economy to
new levels.
What I am saying is that a leader who comes to
power must have a vision and mission of how to turn his society around. This is
not the case in Nigeria .
Is it not worrisome that a man who had contested the presidency of this country
for three consecutive times could not boast of a mission statement when he
eventually got into power? To prove my point about Buhari’s lethargy, I want to
draw a comparison between him and the current president of the Philippines ,
Duterte.
Both men are in the same age bracket. General
Muhammadu Buhari, officially, is 74 years. The President of the Philippines ,
Rodrigo Duterte is 71 years old. Buhari was elected in and sworn in on May 29th, 2015; Duterte was elected and sworn in June 2016. Like Buhari and the APC,
Duterte and his party promised “change”. Buhari is known to be very stubborn,
obstinate and unforgiving, Duterte is known as the “punisher”. Buhari vowed to
curb corruption, stimulate the economy and stem the tide of insecurity; Duterte
vowed to kill suspected drug dealers and other criminals if elected president.
He came into office on the strength of what he achieved as the Mayor of Davao,
Buhari came into office on account of his assumed reputation for
anti-corruption. Buhari was elected into office with 15.4 million votes as
against Jonathan’s 13.3 million votes. Duterte was elected president with 16.1
million votes as against 14.4 million votes scored by Leni Robredo. Buhari has
been in office for 14 months. Duterte has been in office for just one month. In
14 months Buhari has not fulfilled any of his campaign promises. In one month,
Duterte has reined in notorious drug dealers including his own kinsmen. In
terms of educational qualification, Duterte is a political scientist, lawyer
and public administrator. In comparison, Buhari’s educational background has
remained a matter of conjecture. In 2015 Buhari was enmeshed in a certificate
scandal. Till date Buhari has failed to provide his real WAEC result to prove
the he went to school. If he went to any secondary school in Nigeria , he has
been challenged to name his school mates.
You can see why Duterte is succeeding and Buhari is
failing. I have always said that Buhari is not the Messiah Nigerians are
waiting for. My conviction on this is anchored on hard facts. First, it is not
for nothing that early political philosophers like Plato spoke of philosopher-kings.
The thrust of this concept is that he who should occupy the position of
leadership must be a very educated person. Criticisms of this concept
notwithstanding, experience has shown that it is inevitable in
leadership.
A philosopher-king is at the same time a leader and
a motivator; a visionary and a missionary; one who is ready to explore new
frontiers and accommodate all the segments of society. Nigeria has
been less than fortunate in enthroning such leaders. However, the worst mistake
we have made as a people is to enthrone a man who can barely read and write; a
man that does not even have the West African School Certificate as our
president.
In real terms, Muhammadu Buhari does not have the
intellectual capacity to do for Nigeria
what we expect him to do. There is wisdom in the saying that one does not give
what one does not have basically because one cannot go beyond one’s
intellectual capacity. The truth is that no person can go beyond the level his
intelligence. You can only go as far as your intelligence can carry you. Even
Chief Olusegun Obasanjo had noted that Buhari "would not be a good
economic manager". Obasanjo could not have been more correct and
prophetic.
While I commend the discussants on TVC’s Journalists Hangout for their
courage, I want to add to their recommendations, as a way forward, the
immediate resignation or removal of Buhari. That, for me, is the first thing we
have to do on the road to restructuring. I think it is escapist for Buhari and
the APC to keep dwelling on what they think the PDP did wrongly in power as
reasons for failure.
For the records, the Nigerian economy had been
destroyed by the several military juntas we have had in this country (Buhari’s
military dictatorship of 1983 being one of them) even before the PDP came to
power. But my take here is not about PDP or APC. My point is that Buhari is
ill-equipped to drive a process of change and restructuring. Though Nigerians
are presently groaning in hardship, the coming months and years would even be
more gruesome. The times, indeed, are perilous and tragically, this is all
about the Buhari legacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment