By Paul Onomuakpokpo
Since the failure of
the President Muhammadu Buhari government became intolerably manifest, a
noticeable feature of discourse in the public space is its polarisation. In one
camp are those who argue that the present status quo is precisely what the
country needs and in the opposing camp are those who seek its replacement with
a political system that existed in the past. Indeed, the Buhari’s years have
been marked by the citizens’ hankering for the past and the rejection of the
present. Having appropriated the past as the only means of corporate survival,
they want to make it not only the anchor for the present but also the future.
Clearly, we are not witnessing this laudation
of the past for the first time. Ever since the oil boom evaporated and the
country has been afflicted with a governance crisis, the Nigerian people have
often sought to recover a past that they consider a golden era. They do not
seek the co-opting of only some useful values from the past into the enrichment
of the present and the future. No, they want a wholesale displacement of the
past with the present and the future. In this regard, their march to their collective
destiny has often been disrupted by prolonged moments of contemplation of the
desirability of replacing their present with the past.
The pains of the present often make them to forget the perils of the past they
survived to reach the present. Incredibly, this is the refrain among some
citizens who have been traumatised by the present: just bring back the colonial
era. In those moments of seeking the recovery of the colonial past, the
citizens forget the years of struggle and sacrifices to get independence. Or
they want the return of soldiers in the provenance of governance. They forget
the military jackboots on their heads and the loss of lives in the bid to
consign the hijackers of the political space to the barracks. Of course, in the
journey of life such moments of introspection are important. But this is to the
extent that such moments serve to refine the template for the journey towards a
clearly defined destination. Thus, the tragedy of the nation is located in the
absence of such a template. The upshot is that the nation is often frozen in
those moments that ought to be used for a collective introspection. How do a
people progress when in their march to the future, they keep on looking back?
In the heady days of the endless political
transition of the then military dictator, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, he considered
it an overarching challenge to whittle down the influence of the old
politicians and shore up in their place what he rhapsodized as the new breed.
But what Babangida nurtured he soon killed as through his own shenanigans he
did not allow this new breed to bloom.
Since then, the past has always had its hold
on the present. Due to the failure of the leadership of the present, the
citizens often want to go back to the past. Now, some citizens look back at the
days of Shehu Shagari and rue his abrupt loss as the nation’s president. And
this is despite that his government was terminated because of the charges of
corruption against it. Others thought that the Musa Yar’Adua government would
be better than that of Olusegun Obasanjo. But when Yar’Adua and his successor
Goodluck Jonathan failed, some citizens were eager to return to the Obasanjo
era. And now after the fiasco of the Buhari government, some citizens are eager
to go back to the era of Jonathan despite the plethora of the allegations of
corruption against him.
Still, some citizens are alarmed at the
standard of the nation’s current educational system and conclude that the past
is better. They are enamoured of a past when facilities for learning were
available. That was an era when even foreigners were coming to the nation’s
teaching hospitals for treatment. It was an era when graduates of universities
in Nigeria
were sought by schools abroad because they could favourably compete with their
foreign counterparts.
Again, the past is privileged in the quest for the recovery of the 1963
constitution. The 1999 constitution has attracted growing opposition because it
was imposed on the citizens by the military for its selfish reasons. There is
the near-unanimity that that the 1963 constitution holds the magic wand to
solving our problems. Almost on a daily basis, it is attracting support from
diverse quarters. It is a quest that has unified villains and heroes. Babangida
contributed so much to the crisis the country is going through. His refusal to
run a transparent political transition programme led not only to the loss of
democratic values and but also of lives. But apparently, the people are willing
to forgive him his sins as long as he can pull through his putative support for
restructuring. The same gesture is coming the way of Atiku Abubakar. He was the
vice president for eight years after the return of democracy in 1999. That was
an era that was meant for nurturing democratic values. If the government had
effectively done this nurturing for eight years, the nation would not be in its
current crisis. Yet, the citizens may overlook Atiku’s failures and put him
among the nation’s heroes as long as he supports restructuring. Even those who
truncated the democratic process by joining the government of Sani Abacha have
found restructuring as a means of securing political relevance.
And once the national
leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) Bola Tinubu expressed his
support for restructuring, the people seem to forget that he is one of the
architects of our current crisis. He was one of those who projected Buhari as
indispensable to the survival of the country. Tinubu and other leaders of his
party offered to restructure the polity but they reneged on this promise. But
two years after he has been denied what he considered as his gains for
supporting Buhari, he has supported the call for restructuring. And the
citizens would soon overlook his failures and count him among the nation’s
newfangled heroes.
For the nation to develop, it must go beyond
this fixation on the past. It must get to a point where it resolutely marches
to its future in a manner that its past no longer holds so much attraction. In
other words, the progress of the present and goals of the future would make
whatever achievements the past held to be insignificant. This is the challenge
before all the citizens. In this regard, Buhari should not claim that he knows
all the answers; that he is more patriotic than every other citizen. He must
listen to the people and give them what they want. The northern leaders should
also come out with their own proposals on how to make the nation better. It is
not time for northerners to be closet believers in restructuring; they have to
speak out if they think that is the way the nation should go. Ultimately, all
those who are opposed to and in support of restructuring should be able to sit
down together and agree on the mutual strategies to break the hold of the past
on the nation.
By next Sunday, Nigeria
would have spent 57 years on a journey to nowhere. Yet, the drums would be
rolled out by the government to celebrate that day. But beyond the vacuous
celebration, the Buahri government should seize the moment to reflect on
enduring solutions to the nation’s crises. Indeed, it is incumbent on him to
launch the country and its citizens on a march that would make them to be so
consumed by the prospect of the greatness of the future. But he would have
failed if after his tenure, the citizens are still fixated on a glorious past
that they are eager to return to because neither the present nor the future
offers them comfort.
No comments:
Post a Comment