By Steve Orji
Listening to, and probing deeper into the sentiments of Nigerians,
tells you something ominous and it’s the fact that there are yet very deep
cracks within the notion of Nigeria ’s nationhood.
*President Buhari |
The ethnic sentiments often
couched in speeches or responses to national issues, captured in the body
language and emotional sensibilities of well-placed and common Nigerians,
provides a gauge to touch and feel where we are in the march to becoming a
nation.
Are we a nation? We have yet to be!
Forty five years after the end of Nigeria ’s civil war, here lies at the centre of
the Nigeria
psyche, a choreographed prototype of nationalism that is patently false. It’s
clearly a foisted idealism to pronounce we are “one Nigeria ”.
Native wisdom is there to guide any adult who has lived in Nigeria, since
independence, that indeed the best way to be a “Nigerian” is to first be your
tribe, and that keen sense of self-awareness, resonates even more loudly with
our leaders, who have been at the forefront in promoting ethnicity and the
nepotic mind set both in their appointments and distribution of strategic
national asset.
In the twilight of our fading
nationalistic ethos as a budding nation, Buhari as a head of state vitiates
glaringly the notion of one Nigeria
with the entrenchment of his Fulani mentality, a historical replay of the jihad
expedition by his Fulani forbears in the past centuries across Africa , brazenly demonstrated in his national
appointments.
The notion of Nigeria
nationhood seems to draw its traction from the narrative of tribal supremacy,
one tribe, poised with all schemes and machinations available to it, to promote
the welfare of his own kind, while intently working against even the mere
survivability of the other tribes. Ndigbo and the other minority tribes in Nigeria have since been the feudal tenants of a
brutal Nigeria
lord.
Buhari’s kinsmen, the Fulani
herdsmen, are strident expression of Nigeria ’s overkill of tribal
selectiveness. With guns and assault rifles, they have marched down whole
villages, sacked native farmers, raped their women and terrorised indigenes of
whole states. Buhari and his cheery-picked state security chiefs, understates
the scale and dastard nature of these acts, because the acts and authority of
the Fulani herdsmen derives from a latent, mischievous sense of nationhood,
where the north is the King and lord of all.
It would be a boring gist to dwell
again on the historical misfortune of Nigeria ’s amalgamation of 1914,
which artificially brought together intrinsically disparate peoples who are
almost, always divided on issues of religion and ethnicity.
To overlook these overarching differences,
concealed under the false notion of nationalism poses a mortal danger to the
idea of nationhood itself. Buhari inherited a nation that has not made much
progress in resolving such underlining historical issues.
For instance, why is it a requirement
for a Nigerian to identify his or her tribe of origin before he has eligibility
to work outside his or her native place of origin, in public or private
institutions and organisations? The federal character or quota system was
schemed into our national life, for no other reason, than to offer gratis to
some parts of the country that never had the aptitude, learning or skills to
compete on the pitch of national merit.
The resurrection of ethnic
consciousness and strife within the last 20 years, are livid expressions of
irritations and frustrations within a nation that is falsely constituted.
A prominent northern leader once said:
“An Igbo-man will never rule Nigeria
again”. He obviously threw courtesy and gravitas to the wind, and his kinsmen
applauded his laudatory speech.
We can plough deeper into the formal theatre of Nigeria’s rein.What constitute Nigeria ’s
demographics in true terms? Do we have an ethically correct and
well-corroborated census records? What do Nigeria ’s political and economic
demographics depict? A thriving, well-run federation?
Buhari’s challenge and the biggest
one for that matter would well be the opportunity to bring Nigerians into an
honest dialogue, where Nigeria ’s
seemingly intractable problems, cleverly camouflaged as “no-go-areas”, simply
because they are feared to be capable of upsetting the irrational but dubious
tendencies of Nigeria ’s
ruling elites, are finely thrashed out and creative, pragmatic solutions
proffered. Being a nation transcends the geographic parameters that defines, or
accord legitimacy to the 200 million people living in the carved up space,
called Nigeria .
It cuts deeper into the social, cultural and spiritual consciousness that binds
the people inextricably as one people, who are aspiring to a solid, common, yet
intangible vision of national greatness and glory.
At the moment, Nigeria is devoid of any such
genuine collective aspirations; only occasionally do we espouse such unity, and
for it to soon splinter in collision with the impregnable wall of ethnicity. Buhari
may well build Nigeria ’s
economy to become the best and biggest in the world, if he could, and make
corruption a thing of the past. Only then would these achievements and legacies
truly endure.
*Orji wrote fromUnited Kingdom .
*Orji wrote from
No comments:
Post a Comment