By Paul Onomuakpokpo
So former President
Goodluck Jonathan house was plundered? While this is a personal misfortune to
the former president, it serves as a fortuitous reminder to both the leaders
and the citizens of the demands of nation building amid the despoliation of the
national patrimony by those paid to watch over it.
*Dr. Goodluck Jonathan |
At the outset, we need to state in unequivocal
terms that our humanity is by no means vitalised by the troubles of others or
what the Germans would identify as Schadenfreude.
At the same time, we owe no fidelity to the philosophy of not speaking ill of
the dead which deprives us of the reflection that could yield useful lessons
for our own lives. Thankfully, in this case, we do not speak ill of a dead
Jonathan but a man who has not yet passed the bloom of life and still has so
much ahead of him. You need not doubt this – think of Presidents Muhammadu
Buhari and Donald Trump who offered to serve their nations in their seventies
and the point becomes clear.
Jonathan’s four-bedroom duplex in Abuja was stripped bare
of all valuables. These included six television sets, three refrigerators, one
gas cooker, furniture, electronics, toilet and electrical fittings and internal
doors and frames. The suspected masterminds of this larceny are those charged
with the responsibility of guarding the house.
Jonathan has publicly confirmed reports that
the house was burgled. But this public confirmation might have been spurred by
the need to dispel wild speculations about the caches of luxuries in the house
that threw into stark relief his implacable acquisitive character. This public
acknowledgement only came after he had reported the case to the
inspector-general of police who did not waste time in arresting the policemen
who are suspected to have committed the crime.
In these climes, shoeless children of
impecunious parents leave public office as wealthy citizens. Indebted
ex-convicts leave public office and become owners of secondary schools,
universities, posh hotels and vast land. Even those with dubious certificates
end up becoming richer than their states after leaving public office. Against
the backdrop of the massive corruption that is said to have bogged down his
administration, Jonathan may not be considered different from other political
leaders. He may not have only this house lying idle somewhere in Abuja . The policemen had
the freedom to burgle the house simply because Jonathan has not been living
there. This house may not even be as important to Jonathan as other property he
has. Yet the sense of outrage that has compelled him to report the case to the
police cannot escape our attention.
The former president did not say that because
the house was not important to him, he would not protect it by making those
responsible for the despoliation to go unpunished. Now, let’s strip this of its
innocuous character and we are confronted with the national tragedy that has
robbed us as a people of development. If the former president could be so
concerned about his house, which apparently is serving no purpose, why do our
leaders find it unthinkable that the citizens protest when their nation is
pillaged by those put in place to ensure its prosperity? In this case, those
citizens who say that others should not complain about the plundering of the
commonwealth are complicit in the wrecking of the nation by their supposed
protectors.
The nation suffers ruination at the hands of
its leaders when due to the mismanagement of its abundant natural and human
resources, millions of the citizens are rendered jobless. Daily, these are
confronted with an increasingly bleak prospect of starvation and lack of
educational opportunities. Again, there is plundering by the leaders when the
oil resources of a section of the country is used to develop other parts of the
nation and enrich only some people who have access to power through the
allocation of oil blocks but those whose environment is degraded by the
exploration and exploitation of the oil resources are neglected. Amid this,
like the plundering policemen, the leaders continue to steal the nation’s funds
and take them to foreign nations where they buy choice property with part of
the funds and stash others away in coded bank accounts.
Our leaders are outraged at the complaint of
the citizens that their nation is being plundered leaving them to be consigned
to socio-economic fringes of the society. When Ken Saro-Wiwa complained about
the marginalisation of his community while oil companies and the leaders were
colluding to feed fat on its oil resources, he was swiftly executed. The
south-south agitators who took off from where Saro-Wiwa stopped are being
branded economic sabotuers with the threats of eventual liquidation by the
government hanging over their heads.
Yes, let’s shed off the infantile exuberance
of the Igbo youths. What is left are a people who are not oblivious to their
marginalisation in a country where they should be equal partners. Yet they are
told not to complain about this injustice. And not even restructuring which is
the middle course that their elders, the south-south and the south-west have
embraced holds any appeal to the oppressive leaders.
Even in our educational institutions, students
are taught not to complain when it is obvious that the leaders have plundered
the system by their refusal to fund it. They are not to complain that they are
learning under trees and standing to receive lectures. They are not to complain
that they are in schools rendered squalid by dysfunctional water and
electricity systems. If they violate this sacred injunction – do not complain-
they are quickly sanctioned through suspension or eternal expulsion.
Like our current leaders, Jonathan as
president would have dismissed the complaints of the citizens about inequality
in the polity as the ranting of those who crave to be admitted into the inner
sanctum of political power. He would never have brooked the impudence of a
citizen that would make him or her to complain about the plundering of the
nation. Forget the fact that he initiated a process that led to the report of
the 2014 national conference. What should haunt him is that he failed to seize
the momentum and start translating the laudable recommendations of the
conference into reality. We need not rule out the possibility that if he had
implemented them, there would have been a better security system that would
have rendered his property invulnerable to the machinations of
sentinels-turned-burglars.
Jonathan like other former leaders would be
haunted by wasting opportunities to fix our medical facilities and roads. Yes,
they might have appropriated to themselves a hefty proportion of the national
patrimony to save them the perils of road travels and medical treatment at
home. Still, before they go overseas to avail themselves of the medical
facilities of other countries they have developed with the stolen funds they
have hidden in those nations, there lurk the perils of a wobbly aviation sector
that they have neglected.
Even if they all escape these, have they made
all those close to them to be billionaires that they would not need to travel
on the road but hop on a plane wherever they are going? Did Jonathan make all
his community people so rich that instead of using the ill-starred east-west
road while travelling they can effortlessly fly above it on their private jets?
Or Buhari may be so rich that even after leaving Aso Rock he can still have
enough funds to sustain his medical treatment in London . But has he also made everybody in his
community so rich that they can equally go to London or other overseas country for medical
treatment? Let our leaders keep on stealing what belongs to all instead of
developing the nation. Let them keep buying houses. In the long run, what would
be clear is the folly of acquiring property like the house of Jonathan that he
neither needs nor lives in.
No comments:
Post a Comment