By Ray Ekpu
The failure of the
Senate to approve the devolution of powers from the centre to the federating
states is a colossal misreading of the country’s temperature. It sends the
wrong message to the agitators campaigning for ethnic self determination, total
resource control and confederation. It says to them that the Senate thinks
everything is okay in the country; that there is nothing to worry about and
that the country as it is, is working just fine. This is a most regrettable
decision and if the current tension arising from the dysfunctional state of Nigeria reaches
an irreversible crescendo the Senate should hold itself largely responsible.
*Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki |
Here are the facts: there has been a massive
agitation by some Igbo youths for a Biafra
Republic . The numbers are
increasing and on May 30, they grounded all the five Igbo states as a show of
their strength. Some Arewa Youths have asked the Igbos in the north to go away
from their territory before October 1, 2017 otherwise… Some militants in the
South South also say that northerners in the South South should also go away
from their territory before October 1 otherwise… A group in the South West has
already drawn a map of an Oduduwa
Republic meaning that
they are ready to secede except… The Acting President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, has
called a series of fence-mending meetings but no mending has yet taken place.
The Nnamdi Kanu group which calls itself the Independent Peoples of Biafra
(IPOB) has already declared that there will be no governorship election in Anambra State
in November except there is a referendum on the idea of Biafra .
Anambra is coincidentally the home of Emeka Odumegwu–Ojukwu, the Oxford trained historian
– soldier who led the Biafran revolt (1967 – 1970) that ended in a monumental
disaster. One million dead persons later, Kanu is embarking on another Biafra misadventure which is catching the attention of
the youths who have never been victimised by the horrors of war but are
enthused by the prospects of a putative utopia of that ill-fated name.
Take note that it is the unworkability of Nigeria as a nation that creates room for the
workability of Biafra as an idea. Biafra may
not become a nation because a lot is stacked against it but the idea will
survive, will gain traction and gain converts as long as the dysfunctionality
of Nigeria
persists. I have lived through one Biafra in
my life and that was horrendous. I don’t want to live through another Biafra ever again. Kanu is threatening to halt the
Anambra governorship election in November if no referendum is conducted on Biafra before then. It is easier to stop an election than
to conduct it. The reason is that it is easier and safer to stay at home than
to go out to vote with all the attendant risks. What will the government do if
Kanu appropriates Anambra by issuing orders that are obeyed. If people stay
away from the polls in Anambra either in obedience to Kanu’s order or out of
fear then Kanu has won and the government has lost. The Federal Government is likely
to tell people that they will be protected; they have no reason to fear; that
they should go out and vote. If people refuse to vote because they fear for
their lives, then Kanu has appropriated a part of the Federal Republic
because in a democracy election is the instrument of legitimate governance.
With or without Kanu’s shenanigans, Nigeria is a
troubled Republic. This is a huge country with a huge manpower and material
resources, liquid and solid, that ought to gain maximum benefits from the
economies of scale. Such countries as China, India and Indonesia which also
have multi-cultural and multi-racial differences have been able to manage their
diversities into a winning formula by giving significant powers to the
constituent states. On the other hand, we have not benefitted much from our
bigness and our diversity because of our policy of centralisation and
uniformisation of almost every aspect of our lives. It is within these canons
of centralisation and uniformisation that the demon of injustice rears its
horrid head. That causes disharmony and disunity. And the government peddles
the shibboleth that Nigeria ’s
unity is not negotiable. But the government itself has negotiated Nigeria ’s unity
already by selecting all the heads of security outfits from one section of the
country and from one religious group. What that means is that the head of the
government does not trust security personnel from other parts of the country no
matter how qualified they may be. If you don’t trust people from other parts of
the country why should they trust you from the other part of the country. Trust
begets trust, they say. So Nigeria ’s
unity is being inadvertently negotiated already.
We seem to be enthralled by the IMF philosophy of “one size fits all”. A few
example will suffice. In education at the University level we have a central
admission agent called JAMB. It fixes varying cut-off points for kids from
various states. That is discrimination, injustice and inequality. You can’t
build or unite a nation that way. There should be only one cut-off point for
all kids in all states. Those who fail to meet that cut-off point can go
through a remedial programme and get into the university. In any case, I know
of no sensible country in the world that treats university education as “mass
therapy”. Universities have their individual idiosyncrasies and aim to produce
graduates that are uniquely theirs with the identifying attributes of their
university. That process starts with the university’s admission culture. Please
scrap JAMB. Let each university admit whoever they want. I went through that
process. I benefited from the freedom of choice. No two parts of the country
can grow at the same rate educationally no matter how hard you try.
Part of the problem of the states owing salaries
today is corruption, inadequate generation of internal revenue and a wage bill
that is nationally determined. Yes, there can be a national minimum wage but
the wages paid by each state should be determined by the state, according to
the ability of each state. No two states have the same financial strength so
the “one size fits all” policy is part of the problem of our federalism.
Look at this anomaly. We have a federal police
force that is largely funded in the states by the state government. The governor
is called the chief security officer of the state, but he has no administrative
or operational control over the commissioner of police (CP) in the state. That
power resides in the Inspector General of Police in Abuja . And we have had several cases where the
CP had refused to take directives from the Governor, the Chief Security Officer
of the state in which the CP serves. That anomalous situation plus the fact
that you cannot have a single police force in a huge country with various
cultural idiosyncrasies and local traditions. In almost every instance, it is
the local police that knows the lay of the land, and the bad boys and girls in
the community. They, too, know the culture and speak the local language. These
two attributes make for effectiveness in crime prevention and detection and are
perhaps the strongest reasons for a state police in a federation.
If you did not know, know it now. Some states provide facilities for federal
universities and federal health centres in their states. Some others repair
federal roads. The argument of the state governments that carry these extra
burdens on their backs is that these facilities are in their territories and
are utilised largely by the state’s indigenes. If that is so, why should the
Federal Government have responsibilities it does not have the ability to
execute? And why shouldn’t such responsibilities be handled by the state that
is the direct beneficiary of that facility?
The logic for restructuring is that the system
as it is, has not worked efficiently and it could work almost flawlessly if
restructured. Restructuring, as I understand it, is giving more
responsibilities, powers and resources to the states so that they can perform
some of the functions that the Federal Government has not been able to perform.
It also gives each state the opportunity to grow at its own pace, utilising its
comparative advantage the best way it can. The actual content of the
restructuring has to be determined by the various stakeholders in the polity
through negotiation, accommodation and legislation. No perfect solution may be
found that will satisfy all sections of the country but any solution that
removes the current injustices, inequities and roadblocks to a better life for
all Nigerians will be an acceptable solution to the current asphyxiating
gridlock.
*Ray Ekpu, a veteran
journalist, was the CEO of the defunct Newswatch Communications
No comments:
Post a Comment