By Arthur Agwuncha
Nwankwo
This is one question that has bothered many Nigerians.
As much as many of us would readily declare their love for Nigeria and haughtily proclaim that the “unity”
of Nigeria
is not negotiable, I have never stopped asking myself if any of these apostles
of Nigerian patriotism or unity would be willing to put their lives on the line
for the sake of this country. This question has become very germane in our
present situation where the Nigerian state has offered scorpion in place of
fish and stone for bread. I think that time has come when we need to tell
ourselves the home truth. In trying to answer this question, I would like to
draw from an age-long anecdote, which I heard from my father.
*Dr. Arthur Nwankwo |
Once, in a certain community, there was a king who was reputed to be much loved
by his people. He owned large parcels of arable land; uncountable cash crops
and livestock. He offered his resources in the service of his people for a fee.
A man who cultivates on his would share his harvest into two and give the king
half. If the harvest is poor, the king still took his share. But he was known
for his lavish parties where the benighted villagers usually come to gorge themselves.
Suddenly, the
king took ill and the chief priest, after consulting the gods, declared to the
villagers gathered in front of the king’s palace that the gods required one of
them to sacrifice himself so that the king can recover. From the balcony of the
King’s Court, the Chief priest said he would release the feather of a fowl and
on whose head the feather rested that person would be used for the sacrifice.
The feather was released but interestingly all the villagers kept their faces
up; blowing air upwards such that the feather remained in the air. It never
rested on any person’s head. Despite their proclaimed love for their king, none
of them was willing to die for the king.
This is vintage Nigeria .
Despite our pretensions about the unity of a Nigerian state, despite our
pontification about our love for Nigeria ,
nobody in this country is willing to die for Nigeria . Not too long ago, I heard
a former President of this country say on national television that any Nigerian
who was not prepared to die for the country did not deserve to be a Nigerian
citizen. According to this former president, the earlier such a person walked
out of Nigeria ,
the better for the country. This former president was apparently referring to a
former governor who had said emphatically that Nigeria is not worth dying for. I
also recall a former minister for power, who is late now, who said that he was
sure that Nigeria
is worth living for but he was not so sure that it is worth dying for. I have
heard some say that they would love to die for Nigeria ;
but not Nigeria
in its present condition. A market woman once asked me what I consider a
rhetorical question. “Oga”, she said, ‘we are suffering too much in this
country, so how do you expect me to die for Nigeria ? She queried.
The truth is that in Nigeria ,
people think of themselves and their primordial loyalties first before thinking
about Nigeria .
But I recall that late US
President J.F. Kennedy once urged Americans not to ask what their country could
do for them but what they could do for their country. In Nigeria , this
type of clarion call is strange basically because Nigerians seem to be united
in saying that the country must first inspire their patriotism before asking
them for sacrifices.
But what is patriotism? The standard dictionary definition of patriotism says it is “love of one's country.” Stephen Nathanson, in his philosophical study of patriotism argues that the term involves special affection for one's own country, a sense of personal identification with the country; special concern for the well-being of the country and willingness to sacrifice to promote the country's good. Chinua Achebe defines it as “insisting on the best for your people; and demanding the best from your people”.
But what is patriotism? The standard dictionary definition of patriotism says it is “love of one's country.” Stephen Nathanson, in his philosophical study of patriotism argues that the term involves special affection for one's own country, a sense of personal identification with the country; special concern for the well-being of the country and willingness to sacrifice to promote the country's good. Chinua Achebe defines it as “insisting on the best for your people; and demanding the best from your people”.
*Achebe |
It does appear that if one is to be a patriot of his/her country, the country
must be his/hers in some significant sense; and that may be best captured by
speaking of one's identification with it. Such identification is expressed in
patriotic feelings: in pride of one's country's merits and achievements; and in
shame for its lapses or crimes when these are acknowledged, rather than denied.
Thus, patriotism can be defined as love of one's country, identification with
it, and special concern for its well-being and that of compatriots.
Such identification is rooted in a sense of “we-feeling” or what the
sociologists call “espirit de corps”. It is festooned by pride for one’s home
country; a feeling of commitment and assurance that in sacrificing for the
country, his/her future and the future of his generations are guaranteed. This
type of feeling arises when there are common values upon which the people owe
allegiance. In Nigeria ,
this could be defined as pan-Nigerianism. This is both a philosophical and
intellectual movement which aims to build an autochthonous Nigerian state from
a colonial contraption; a philosophy that seeks to enthrone the ideals of
Nigerianism above ethnic considerations; a mindset that would make each and
every one of us first and foremost Nigerians before members of our ethnicities.
Nnamdi Azikiwe, easily the father of Nigerian nationalism, sought to enthrone
this philosophy of pan-Nigerianism, which he hoped would encourage and
strengthen bonds of solidarity between the various peoples of Nigeria . Based
upon a common fate of lumping all of us together in a geographical space call Nigeria , Zik’s
idea was to extend his philosophy of “one in brotherhood” beyond ethnic
frontiers. Zik’s pan-Nigeria was anchored on the belief that unity, tolerance
and understanding among the various ethnic groups that constitute Nigeria,
irrespective of religious and cultural affiliations, is vital to economic,
social, and political progress of the country. Borrowing from the concept of
pan-Africanism, Azikiwe’s pan-Nigerianism aimed to "unify and uplift"
Nigerians of all walks of life in the belief that the fate of all Nigerians,
ethnic and religious persuasion notwithstanding, are intertwined. At its core,
Zik’s ideology of pan-Nigerianism was a movement premised on the belief that
Nigerians all around the world shared a common destiny.
That spirit of pan-Nigerianism was dealt a mortal blow in the Western House of
Assembly when the forces of tribal politics betrayed Zik, and according to
Chinua Achebe “sent the great Zik scampering back to the Niger , whence
he came”. An unbiased reading of Achebe’s There was a Country would suggest
that there was a time in Nigeria when people felt strong about making
sacrifices that would inspire change.
Our intention at independence was to hand over to our children a banner without
stain; to build a nation where no man is oppressed. These lofty ideals
constitute the second stanza of the old Nigerian national anthem. That stanza
said:
And this we count as gain
To hand on to our children
A banner without
stain
O God of all creation,
Grant this our one request
Help us to build a
nation
Where no man is oppressed
And so with peace and plenty
Nigeria may be
blessed.
Today, we have stained the banner of the Nigerian State
with the innocent blood of over three million south-easterners in a genocidal
pogrom; Ndigbo have been oppressed, marginalized and alienated and the blood of
our people is crying out for redemption. We have thrown away our ozo titles;
preferring the garlands of infamy and wickedness. Nigeria has become a cesspool of
corruption and religious intolerance. Day after day, we see, hear and read of
macabre slaughter of innocent people all in the name of religion. The State has
done nothing to offer reprieve. The government is run by a mafia-type Gestapo
that has become notorious for self-perpetuation at all costs. Today, there is a
deeper commitment to ethnicity than to the country as a whole.
The present situation in Nigeria
has resulted in millions of deaths due to starvation and hardship. How can
anyone die for a country that refuses to be transparent and accountable to her
citizens? How can anyone die for a country that boasts of some of the best
brains in the world yet suffers heavily because of corruption? If Americans,
Britons, Germans or even South Africans are willing to die for their countries,
it is because there are incentives for them to do so. If they are willing to
die for their nations, it is because there are functional systems of
performance and reward; social welfare packages, accountability and
transparency in governance, a sense of commonwealth and faith in the
collective.
In Nigerian, there are no such incentives that can move anybody to stick out
his/her neck for the disaster called Nigeria . If the rich politicians
and treasury looters in Nigeria
feel confident in talking about patriotism, they do so because they are being
well-taken care of by the corrupt system, which they strive so hard to sustain.
If the successive governments in Nigeria
had protected and taken care of the masses, then perhaps the people would feel
patriotic and ready to die for Nigeria .
The truth is that for much of its existence as a country, Nigeria has
been cursed with inept leaders who, along with their cronies, have plundered
the commonwealth and ruined the country's institutions. Nigeria is a
country with awesome potential for regional and continental dominance but has
wasted every opportunity that came its way. Nigeria is a country that has
aborted the hopes, aspirations, and possibilities of its people; a country that
cannot provide basic public goods such as security, public infrastructures, and
an enabling environment for decent living. This is a country that has killed
the love, respect and loyalty of her citizens and to that extent murdered the
spirit of patriotism in them. This government has worsened the situation and
has also lost legitimacy and has estranged itself from the people.
In truth Nigeria
is not worth dying for. Like I always say, there is no basis for what we call
Nigerian unity safe for the interest of those who benefit from the rot.
Nigerians are not bonded by common national ethos or values; they are not
bonded by the need to exist as a country nor do they have any known common
philosophy except the ideology of corruption and primitive accumulation. There
can be no sacrifice for a country that sacrifices its very best on the altars
of Molech and Ashtoreth. A country that assassinates its very best is not worth
dying for. A country that stealthy promotes and sustains religious terrorism is
not worth dying for. A country that has lost count of its unemployed youths
roaming the streets is not worth dying for. A country that incites and
participates in ethnic and religious cleansing is not worth dying for. No! Nigeria is not
worth dying for. That is my verdict.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment