By Moses Ochonu
Governor Nasir El-Rufai has caused
Audu Maikori to be arrested for sending a tweet that relied on false
information about an attack that never occurred, a tweet for which he has since
apologized. Maikori has been a critic of the governor's handling of the Southern Kaduna killings.
*Gov Nasir El-Rufai |
El-Rufai's latest canard to defend his tyranny and
intolerance for critique is what he calls "a policy of consequence."
Very chic. The problem is that not a single one of the foreign herdsmen he says
are responsible for killing hundreds of Southern Kaduna people's have been
arrested for murder. Not a single one of them has faced this "policy of
consequences."
In fact instead of being arrested, El-Rufai rewarded
them with handsome payments to silence their guns. Yet Southern
Kaduna folks like Maikori who complain about their menace, even if
relying on unreliable information produced in the haze of crisis, are hounded
into detention. It's different strokes for different folks.
We have a situation now where the governor prioritizes
what he nebulously calls the offense of incitement over that of mass murder.
But even here, he is being disingenuous. Governor El-Rufai is the
inciter-in-chief in Kaduna .
Just the other day, he was on Channels TV accusing Southern
Kaduna elders and church leaders of encouraging and profiting from
the murder of their own people! What could be more inciting than this
recklessly incendiary statement?
Just a few years ago, he tweeted that soldiers and
civilians who killed a Fulani person had taken a blood debt that would be
avenged by the Fulani in the future. He has never apologized for or taken back
this Rwanda-level genocidal incitement.
The same El-Rufai tweeted that the Nigerian army was
"Jonathan's genocidal army." Here is a governor who once peddled the
wicked conspiracy theory that Boko Haram was being sponsored by CAN, among
several other inciting public statements capable of inflaming the polity.
Instead of facing consequences, for sowing the seed of incitement and division
in Kaduna , he
became its governor and has continued this pattern of incitement. So much for
the policy of consequences.
All tyrants are also hypocrites. The inciter-in-chief
now talks about "a policy of consequences" but exempts himself from
the consequences of his own hateful, inciting speech while going around
arresting citizens who, even if overzealously, call attention to the
consequences of the governor's past and present incitement.
Perhaps El-Rufai should start by arresting himself. He
would be setting a good example and modeling his new "policy of
consequences." He should lead by example and surrender himself to the
police for his numerous acts and speeches of incitement.
And by the way, El-Rufai has arrested and charged
several journalists and commentators critical of his administration since
becoming governor less than two years ago. One of them, Dr John Danfulani, has
done several stints in El-Rufai's gulag and still faces the governor's trumped
up charges. Were those detentions too about the policy of consequences or
familiar expressions of the governor's legendary Napoleonic intolerance for
dissent and criticism?
*Moses Ochonu, a Professor
of History, shared these thoughts on his facebook page
No comments:
Post a Comment