By Gani Adams
I would like to salute the organisers of this event for counting
me worthy to deliver this lecture on an issue that threatens the very basis of
our unity as we speak. There are many sides to the farmers/herdsmen’s crisis
but let us just consider two, namely the political and the economic.
*Gani Adams |
The
political side
Now, Nigeria , for many of
its over 250 ethnic groups, is obviously not a nation in the sense that we
regard France , United Kingdom or South Africa as a nation. That is
why, as recently pointed out by Mr. Dan Nwayanwu, former chairman of the Labour
Party, during a programme organised by the Ondo State Government in Akure:
given an option, many of the ethnic groups in Nigeria
would prefer to opt out of Nigeria .
Already,
groups such as the Indigenous People of Biafra and the Niger Delta Avengers,
among others, have more or less shattered whatever illusions we may retain
regarding the Nigeria
that we are living in. While Nigeria
would obviously be better off remaining a nation, it is also true that a
surgical operation is required to take out the cancer of disintegration
currently ravaging the country on every side. And this is quite simply because Nigeria , as it
is presently operated, is not sustainable.
In the USA , it was the
states that came together to form the central/federal government currently
headed by Barack Obama.
In Nigeria , it was
the Centre or Federal Government that created the states for political reasons
and to achieve what the eminent Igbo scholar, Chinweizu, referred to as
Caliphate Colonialism; a system whereby some people are born to rule. This is
quite simply an aberration, and our consideration of farmers/herdsmen’s clashes
must thus begin from this context.
If we have
a federal republic that is nothing but a sham, a big fraud, why then are we
surprised that a group of Boko Haram members masquerading as herdsmen have been
terrorising innocent farmers across the country? If, for instance, there is
state police, would the herdsmen have found it easy to attack farmers, rape
women and slaughter them afterwards, burn down entire villages, and even carry
out major robberies on major highways while the security agencies look the
other way?
For how
long shall we have Chief Security Officers (governors) of states who do not
even have the police under their control? By the way, what manner of security
officer does not even have a gun in his possession? Can a person who cannot
organise his own security protect others?
Before you think
that I am exaggerating, consider this: between 2010 and 2013, according to a
report, Fulani herdsmen killed about 80 people. However, by 2014, they had
slaughtered 1,229 people. When you consider the Global Terrorism Index, you
discover that Fulani herdsmen are now Number Four on the list of the deadliest
terror groups in the world. Boko Haram, of course, takes the first position. As
noted by a recent report, over 2,000 people were killed in conflicts between
the herdsmen and different host communities in 2015 alone.
In
comparison, the regular Boko Haram kills 2,500 people annually. In a situation
where a group of supposed herdsmen carry sophisticated weapons and wipe out
entire communities, the unity of the Nigerian nation is indeed threatened. The
argument has been advanced that the herdsmen have become so bold in recent
times because the current president happens to be Fulani. There may be some
truth in that, because the history of bloodshed during elections in Nigeria proves clearly that Nigeria is a
very divided country, with people being prepared to shed blood in order for
their kinsman to win.
A lot of
people celebrate former President Goodluck Jonathan for his exemplary conduct
during the 2015 general elections. However, we need to ask: for how long can we
continue to live in a country where some people must either have their way, or
blood will flow?
I ask this
question because the farmers/herdsmen’s clashes in Nigeria have its roots in the sharp
divisions among the ethnic groups in the country. If we were all united and put
Nigeria first, we would have
risen as one man and condemned the genocide in Agatu land in Benue State .
Did we? Did the nation rise as one man or woman to condemn the atrocities of
the Fulani herdsmen who always undermine the kindness of their hosts and
unleash violence on them?
In Brazil , South Africa , USA , etc, cattle are not allowed to
roam freely in town; neither do herdsmen carry out genocide because there is a
truly federal system with city governance, state governance and federal
governance and their related security systems in place. It is time, therefore,
to drop the nomadic way of life. It is simply unsustainable.
The
economic side
Dr. Bukola Saraki, while serving as governor ofKwara State ,
introduced the Shongai farms where foreign investors carried out modern animal
husbandry. The cattle were, and still are, being produced in a ranch, and they
are far better than the ones raised through the nomadic system.
Dr. Bukola Saraki, while serving as governor of
I have been
informed that while cattle reared through the nomadic system may not be more
than 250 kg
in weight, cattle raised in Shongai and other ranches often weigh as much as
750kg, Cattle ranching, therefore, brings more profit. It is even cheaper in
the long run than the nomadic system which is operated through the blood and
sweat of farmers across the country. Ranches provide cattle with a decent
environment in which to thrive, with water, doctors, etc, all available.
On the
other hand, the nomadic system simply puts the cattle through stress, and is a
form of animal abuse, or disregard for animal life and welfare. On another
level, how do we attain food security and sufficiency when farmers are under
threat? How can we attain the Sustainable Development Goals when food
production is under threat? Nomadic cattle rearing creates ethnic divisions and
tensions, and is a criminal system which allows terrorists to commit murder and
genocide as their lordship pleases.
Conclusion
Those of us who attended the 2014 National Conference know thatNigeria
cannot make any progress without implementing the report of that conference.
For instance, the report deals extensively with how to eradicate the
herdsmen/farmers’ clashes.
Those of us who attended the 2014 National Conference know that
Other
recommendations of the Confab that require urgent implementation include the
introduction of State Police, control of Solid Mineral by states where they are
domicile, control of the Supreme Court by States, adoption of the French
Presidential system of government, voluntary merger of states that so desire,
Creation of Zonal Constitution, creation of more local government by states,
federating units to participate in resource extraction and reduction of items
on exclusive list. More fundamentally, it points the way forward for Nigeria . And
that way forward is federalism.
Let us go back to what we had in the First Republic, a system whereby the
component units of this country would control their own resources and determine
how to live their lives and what form of government to operate. If we do this,
we will have a decisive framework for dealing with issues such as the one
addressed in this brief lecture.
Until the
report is implemented, we will just be going round in circles and life in Nigeria will
continue to be nasty, short and brutish.
The time to
change our path is now.
*Otunba Gani Adams,
National Coordinator of the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC), delivered this at the
Democracy Day lecture organised by the Ondo State Chapter of the Nigeria Union
of Journalists (NUJ) at Alagbaka, Akure on May 30, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment