By Paul Onomuakpokpo
It remains a puzzle of
governance in Africa why those we entrust with
leadership do not creditably acquit themselves like their counterparts in some
nations of the world. Before our politicians get power, we are enthralled
by their resonant visions of an equitable society that would be an all-powerful
response to the mockery that the black man would irremediably
chafe under the affliction of inept leadership. But once they
are in office, they often fail to translate such grand dreams into
reality. After they leave office, they regain the trajectory of
articulating how a great society should be run.
*Jonathan |
This is the problem of
a nation whose leaders do not really prepare for leadership. They are
imposed on the citizens by themselves, others or circumstances. It is only
when they are thrown up by circumstances or other people or they bulldoze their
way into power that they start to learn about what they should do while in
office. Of course, this is in the rare case of when they learn at all. Most
times, our leaders do not bother to learn about the real issues for which they
are in office.
Rather, once they get
to office, they become not only enamoured of it, they are pre-occupied with how
to sustain themselves in their position to the detriment of good governance.
This is when they think of the next election and how they would return to their
offices. It is when they would globe-trot, marry more wives and take more
chieftaincy titles. It is because our leaders only remember the right things
they should have done only after leaving office that the country would remain
undeveloped or even retrogress.
But the real tragedy is that such leaders do not behave in a manner that
shows that they regret frittering away some opportunities to do great things
for their country. For instance, ever since former President Olusegun Obasanjo
left office, he has been behaving as though he were the
only Nigerian alive who could proffer solutions to the
seemingly intractable problems of the nation. It is in the same mould that
former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has caught the limelight by canvassing the
restructuring of the country as the solution to its myriad of problems. If they
had used the opportunities they had to do what they are talking about now, they
would not need to push them into public consciousness now.
Ever since he left
office, former President Goodluck Jonathan has been silent. Even when it seemed
he would react to the persistent insinuations of his complicity in the
corruption charges hanging over many of his aides, he has avoided being
embroiled in them. But he broke his silence on Monday when he spoke in London . Indeed,
Jonathan’s speech brims with stellar ideas about how to run a society that
is underpinned by a clearly defined bill of rights. Jonathan wants such a bill
of rights to be similar to the British Magna Carta established some 800
years ago, and the one introduced by America ’s Founding Fathers.
Jonathan claims to be
expressing ideas he arrived at after “learning from my experiences.” But
Jonathan did not tell us at what point this learning took place. Was it before
he took public office? Was it while he was in public office? Was it after he
left public office? If Jonathan knew all that he spoke about before or while he
was in office, then he failed by not putting them into practice as his dismal
performance has shown.
No doubt, as President Muhammadu Buhari has often acknowledged, Jonathan’s
concession of defeat at the last presidential election saved the
nation from a possible crisis of political transition. Jonathan was right in
praising himself for this. However, Jonathan betrayed himself as only reading a
well-written speech by somebody other than himself by praising himself for
how he fought corruption. For if he had really reflected as he claimed he did
and he had written the speech by himself, he would have realised the need for
him to be silent about this since it is now clear that he never really fought
corruption. Jonathan cannot claim to have fought corruption when he refused to
send away from his government those over whom there were charges of corruption.
If Jonathan did not make money available to anyone as he claimed, was it
ghosts like the perennial ghost workers in government that
made the billions of naira available for his officials to share among
themselves?
Our past leaders who
failed the nation have the courage to speak glowingly about themselves and
their eras because the society does not sanction them for their failures while
in office. If Jonathan had been arrested and prosecuted for corruption like his
aides, he would not be talking about how he fought corruption. He is free now
to talk about corruption because Buhari is prosecuting a skewed anti-corruption
campaign that excludes some people.
Jonathan envisions a
society where there would be equality. But how would such a society
have emerged when Jonathan encouraged a system that made only a few
people billionaires while the majority are consigned
to abject poverty? It is because the nation’s resources have not been
fairly distributed that crises persist in the Niger Delta and other parts of
the country. Jonathan missed the great opportunity to ensure justice and
equity for the people of the Niger Delta.
And now the Buhari government and his political party are latching on to
the notion that if the Jonathan government really believed in the national
conference report, he should have implemented those parts that were within his
power to execute. And while it is good that Jonathan encouraged education by
establishing federal universities in 12 states that did not have such
opportunities before, the fact remains that such educational opportunities
would not translate to much as long as there is no equity in the society. It is
because there is no equity that the thousands of graduates churned out by the
universities that he has created do not get jobs.
Thankfully, if Jonathan
had only learnt all these grand ideas he shared with his audience in London after leaving
office, he has an opportunity to work towards their realisation through his
Goodluck Jonathan Foundation. But while doing this he should not give the
impression that he has done so much for Nigeria and that it is out of the
experience of the great legacies he has bequeathed to his country that he is
helping other nations.
Nigerians cannot forget
so soon how his tenure as the president turned to a blight on the
citizens. Jonathan’s public recollection of his achievements in office
must be mediated by the consciousness of his Bill of Failures and that if he
had governed strictly by his now much-cherished Bill of Rights, no Nigerian
would not be proud to declare as he put it, ‘
Civis Nigerianus Sum’ – I am a citizen of Nigeria .
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on
The Guardian Editorial Board
No comments:
Post a Comment