By Paul Onomuakpokpo
At the height of the recession in 2008, those on the sidelines of
the corporate world were scandalised by the blithe ease with which chief
executive officers (CEOS) of companies, especially those in the United States were giving themselves
hefty compensation. This came in the form of robust salaries, bonuses,
stock option, severance pay and other benefits. Even those CEOs
whose remorseless mismanagement of their companies triggered financial
catastrophes that led to the collapse of their
institutions and the loss of jobs by thousands of workers gave
themselves robust reward packages. Of course, nobody would have
protested if the compensation the CEOs were giving themselves were a
reward for making their companies to meet their organisational goals,
even surpass them and bring prosperity to their shareholders and workers.
Even in Nigeria , in the
midst of the crisis, some CEOs, especially those of banks were busy buying
private jets and fancy vehicles for themselves and acquiring
properties all over the world. But after the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
took over some of these banks, there were several allegations of how these CEOs
who were living big were actually deploying their organisations’ finances
including those of shareholders and depositors to cater to their lavish
lifestyles. While some of these CEOs were deprived of their banks, others
managed to return to those institutions in higher capacities as chairmen. But
before the crisis eased, some shareholders of these banks who sold their
houses and used all their life savings to invest in them had taken
their own lives.
Recent developments at
MTN, a telecommunications giant, evoke the sad memories of the global
recession. The MTN forced its CEO in South
Africa and his counterpart in Nigeria to resign when they bungled a
directive by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to
register the telephone numbers of its subscribers in Nigeria .
Outraged, the Nigerian government through the NCC asked the
company to pay a N1.4 trillion fine. The matter has dragged on, and
despite the MTN’s hiring of a U.S. attorney to negotiate
with the Nigerian government, no truce has been brokered. The crisis has
inflicted a heavy toll: the prices of the company’s shares have crashed on the
South African stock exchange, jobs have been lost and some
subscribers of the company have switched patronage. It was amid these
developments that the news broke this week that MTN has paid the two former
CEOs a severance package worth N560 million.
All these developments
tend to reinforce the notion that in the world of business there
is neither justice nor morality. Or else why should the CEOs who created
problems for the company be the ones to be rewarded while the other
stakeholders in the company, including employees and shareholders
are made to either suffer job loss or a cut in salary if at all they are still
employed while investors have the value of their shares whittled
down? In justifying the payment of CEOs after taking their organisations
through paths that are paved with calamitous consequences, there is often the
argument that they are experts who take risks on behalf of their companies. But
such an argument is invalidated in so far as whatever risk the CEOs may
have taken that does not redound to the bottom line of their companies should
elicit censure and not seeming approbation. Indeed, it is not because the
CEOs are right that they succeed in paying themselves heavy compensation
after making their companies to suffer huge losses. It is rather that
through a certain canny dispensation of favour to those who could have
challenged them, they rather get their support.
The CEOs often get the
support of their board members. The board members approve
such outrageous compensation because it is the CEOs who put them on
the board. They also enjoy the support of some shareholders on the board
because the latter have been silenced by some iniquitous compensation. But
by supporting such compensation, the shareholders do not properly represent the
interest of the bulk of the investors who put them on the board. They only
cater to their own selfish interest. In the long run, it is the
shareholders whose stock value has been weakened who suffer. The
workers who are dismissed or whose salaries are cut also suffer.
This criminal and
self-serving way of running corporations could be seen in the management
of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). In the light of
the persistent fuel shortage, it is clear that the managers of the
nation’s petroleum sector do not have the answers that are urgently needed. The
refineries are not performing optimally to serve the purpose for which they
were established.
Yet, the managers of
NNPC are not only being paid heavily, they have severally been
indicted for mismanaging the funds that ought to go to the national treasury.
And when the Minister of State for Petroleum, Ibe
Ikachikwu, blamed the country’s persistent fuel shortage on the
diversion of the product to Chad
and Cameroun ,
he needed not be reminded that the saboteurs could be within the corporation he
is presiding over. So the issue is not just planning to put trackers in
trucks and all that, the minister should equally take cognisance of the need to
ferret out those within the corporation who are colluding with outsiders to
sabotage effective fuel supply in the country.
Our officials who are
entrusted with state responsibilities often disappoint the citizens. Yet they
are rewarded. This is why coupists who truncated democratic dispensations
in which huge resources had been invested are given pensions and other
benefits at the end of their misadventures. This is why instead of the National
Judicial Council (NJC) appropriately sanctioning erring judges they are only
retired for them to enjoy the proceeds of their corruption in peace. How many
members of the bench whom the NJC has indicted for corruption have been tried
in court, found guilty and are now getting their well-deserved comeuppance in
prison? It is the same way that politicians are given all manner of rewards
after not only failing to redeem their electioneering promises but
also emptying the treasury. It is why a person like the Senate president may
just be sniggering at those who do not understand the ways of politicians and
are calling for his resignation.
With the reward for
those who ought to be reprimanded and exited ignominiously, the impression is
being given that the easiest place to be is at the top – it does not
need to task your intelligence and competence. And this is why there is so much
jostle for the top in our national life. After all,
when you fail as a leader and you are unable to pay the salaries of
your civil servants and pile up debts for the generation unborn,
your reward is assured. You would end your tenure and go
home with your fat severance compensation not only for yourself
but your entire family. And you would even be rewarded with another more
lucrative public office. It is only the poor who would suffer
the baleful consequences of the leader’s incompetence and who would
continue to be afflicted with a regime of austerity measures.
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on the Editorial Board of The Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment