By Ikeogu Oke
Reading some of the public commentaries – and other forms of
reactions – on the current fuel crisis and associated issues, I was
reminded of why I opposed the controversial call to kill the Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) made last year by a prominent Nigerian politician.
The politician reportedly summed up his justification for the call with the
words: “If you don’t kill the NNPC, it will kill Nigeria.” Clearly, those words should incline all
patriotic Nigerians to see the country’s survival and theirs as dependent on
their killing NNPC at a time when,
due to various factors, its popularity was arguably at its nadir.
Prominent among those factors were allegations of massive corruption and
chronic mismanagement. And since we would naturally like to survive together
with our country and be rid of things that pose a fatal threat to our joint
existence (as the call implies about NNPC), I believe the politician in
question expected us to accept the kill-or-be-killed scenario he created and
act like people who understand that self-preservation is the first law of
nature. An instance of the instigation or blackmail to kill for supposed
self-preservation couldn’t have been more subtle or effective to the discerning
mind.
Now, one of such public
commentaries is Moses E. Ochonu’s “Dr. Kachikwu’s Blunders” – published
recently in Sahara Reporters and Premium Times – which more or less sums up the
predicament of the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources in managing the current
fuel scarcity in the country thus: “Whatever he is doing is not working… The
man thrives on deception and propaganda…. He deserves whatever opprobrium is
heaped on him.” Let me say en passant that this sort of criticism is too harsh
and demoralising. The function of the responsible social critic is to build
hope while identifying problems, and not to demoralise. Ochonu’s criticism
demoralises by its unjustified total condemnation of its target and his
efforts, and by spreading despair.
And by other forms of
reactions, I refer to such call made by the leaders of the Academic Staff Union
of Universities (ASUU) on the Network News of the Africa Independent Television
(AIT) on April 11, 2016, asking for the minister’s resignation.
Well, I argued in my response to the call to kill NNPC that, whatever the
problem with NNPC, our interest as a nation is better served by reforming
rather than killing it. In fact, I was convinced that killing NNPC would amount
to turning the organisation into a corporate scapegoat, sacrificing the life of
one institution to “atone” for perennial sins plaguing our entire nation like
corruption, short-termism and poor maintenance culture. And I do not see how
such scapegoat syndrome can solve any of the problems to which it has become a
habitual reaction with some of us. Rather, it has always seemed to me like
slaughtering a sacrificial victim to appease some fetish of activist hypocrisy
that would rather not take cognisance of the complexity and resilience of such
problems because it serves some vested interests while pretending not to do so.
I also see the call for
Dr. Ibe Kachikwu’s resignation by Chief Bola Tinubu, which serves as a
background for Ochonu’s unsparing criticism of the former – and the similar
call by the ASUU leadership – as fresh instigations to lead yet another
sacrificial victim, a human scapegoat rather than corporate one like NNPC, to
the altar of the same fetish. I wonder if Ochonu and the ASUU executive
recognise how long the problems leading to the current fuel scarcity have
lasted with our tolerance as a people, like a pustule growing under the skin of
a negligent person who only begins to take note and complain after it has grown
into a big boil and ruptured, causing them serious discomfort. Thereafter, they
blame the physician who may well be doing his best to bring them relief or cure
that he is “making things worse” and not acting fast enough.
For instance, in the
past 16 years before Dr. Kachikwu assumed office as Minister of State for
Petroleum Resources, billions were spent on the “turn around maintenance” of
our refineries by successive governments. Specifically, $1.6 billion (about
N251 billion) was reportedly voted for the turnaround maintenance of the four
refineries across the country by the end of 2014. Yet, nothing seemed to
have been achieved by way of truly turning the refineries around to refine
enough fuel for our local consumption. Hence, we have remained stuck with the
shame of fuel importation – for our shores are practically awash with the natural
resource from which fuel is refined. And we have continued to expend huge sums
to subsidise the product, while putting up with allegations of corruption by
entities involved in fuel importation, some of which border on economic
sabotage.
Indeed, if anyone were
to succeed in resolving this situation that has defied previous governments for
nearly two decades in the roughly seven months Dr. Kachikwu has been in office,
I would perhaps consider that person not as a magician – which Kachikwu rightly
but tactlessly said he is not, and for which he has apologised – but as a
miracle worker or superhuman.
And I am at a loss as
to why some of us fail to appreciate that the current difficulties in turning
our fuel situation around are worse than before, considering the harsh economic
realities due to the drastic fall in oil prices, and the proportionate decline
in forex earnings to support fuel importation or finance the maintenance of our
refineries even in their current states. The solution, especially if it must be
long-term, lies in thinking creatively and taking radical measures which I
believe the current government is doing despite serious handicaps.
To adapt that famous
quote by Albert Einstein, it would be madness to expect to be doing the same
thing about our fuel situation and not remain in the same dissatisfactory
position. The current situation requires supportive action, understanding,
patience and sacrifice from the generality of Nigerians, as one would expect
from good members of a family whose breadwinner suddenly lost their job or had
their wages reduced drastically; and who, not of their own making, lacks the
savings to cushion the resultant hardship for the family.
Since the NNPC, our
entire oil sector and the way business is done in it are undergoing reform, we
must understand that the fruits of reform, like every other fruit, can taste
sour until it ripens with the possibility of tasting sweet.
The real question should be: What should responsible and patriotic citizens do at a time like this – “a time that tries men’s souls,” to quote Thomas Paine?
The real question should be: What should responsible and patriotic citizens do at a time like this – “a time that tries men’s souls,” to quote Thomas Paine?
I think the least
should be to offer suggestions as to how the problems can be solved for the
general good. And I do not see how calling for the resignation of Kachikwu
without guaranteeing that the problems will suddenly disappear with his
resignation and replacement or criticising the government without suggesting
better steps than those being taken by it qualify as solutions to the problems.
Curiously, some of these calls are coming even after the minister of state has unveiled a holistic blueprint for reversing the current situation and working towards a lasting solution.
* Oke, a public affairs analyst, lives inAbuja and wrote via: ikeogu.oke@gmail.com.
Curiously, some of these calls are coming even after the minister of state has unveiled a holistic blueprint for reversing the current situation and working towards a lasting solution.
* Oke, a public affairs analyst, lives in
No comments:
Post a Comment