By Paul
Onomuakpokpo
If our claim to being
an irreducible part of civilised humanity is to be validated, we must meet an
acceptable degree of adherence to the norms that guarantee that level of life
that is superior to that of a people at their inchoate stage of development. For
what entitles us to be a part of civilised humanity when the
robust allowance we ought to make for the sanctity of human life is
non-existent?
*President Buhari |
If we all take it as a given that respect for human
life is a fundamental principle of a civilised society, then we
must come to the grim realisation that as a people we still have so much work
to do to remain part of the civilised world. For clearly, the ascendancy of the
disdain for the sanctity of human life in our society daily spawns crises with
their attendant loss of lives. If these deaths were only caused by Boko Haram,
there would have been the tragic consolation that the perpetrators are only
irredeemable and blood-sucking lunatics on the fringes of humanity.
The first
step towards retrieving the society from its self-affliction of the warped
norms that nurture violence is that our political leaders must not recoil from
the responsibility of admitting that they were the ones who first
torpedoed the rules of mutual engagement that foster trust between the leaders
and the citizens. In them is reposed the trust of using the nation’s resources
to improve the lot of all the people. But on almost every occasion, this trust
is often injudiciously requited. They cater to their selfish
interest – buying mansions they do not need, buying private jets to
escape the pothole-ridden roads they fail to repair and acquiring
wives and mistresses in conformity with their sybaritic lives .
This
state of mutual distrust is expressed in an aggravated form through ethnic
suspicion. The tragic consequence is that thousands are killed on account
of unfathomable or the flimsiest provocation. It is this
mutual suspicion that provides the ground for the perpetuation
of the inter-ethnic feud as the case of the Agatu community where hundreds
were allegedly killed by herdsmen. In the case of the people of
Agatu and the herdsmen, we may make an allowance for the
possibility that a lack of constant interactions has
over the years exacerbated this mutual distrust. But how could
there be mutual distrust among people who intermingle almost daily in the
course of business or living in the same neighbourhood? This is the puzzle
that the tragic clash between traders of different ethnic origins
threw up in Lagos
recently.
Now,
rather than work towards the erasure of this mutual tension, our political
leaders are preoccupied with how to plunge us further into the murky cesspool
of inter- and intra-ethnic suspicion with its attendant bloodbath. Take
for instance how our leaders engage in politics at any level. With the
peaceful transition of political power at the national level last year, there
was the heightened hope that the nation had at last inaugurated an
enduring component of the democratic experience. Most Nigerians felt that
at last the incubus of violence that often jinxed the critical moments of
political transitions at the council, state and federal levels had been
exorcised. Ostensibly, they thus tended to dismiss as a red herring any
complaint that violence discredited the elections that held in some
communities.
Still, we
have recurrent political violence to contend with. For violence is a perennial
marker of the lack of the development of our political experience
– the nation’s democratic project still has a very long way to go
before it becomes a veritable means of transforming lives. It is
because violence has become an indispensable part of our political experience
that it offers little or no surprise that ahead of the state and National
Assembly rerun polls fixed for March 19,2016 in Rivers State ,
there has been so much crisis triggered by politicians. The grisly statistics:
a man, his wife and son were shot dead; and a middle-aged man, was
hacked down and burnt.
These are apart from kidnappings of
political opponents or their relations. This pall of violence has made
some of the 300 lecturers of the University
of Port Harcourt
including the vice chancellor who have been listed as ad hoc staff of the
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to insist on not participating in the
supervision of the rerun. Indeed, our politicians have failed to learn any
lessons. No lessons have been learnt from the tragedies of the
Rivers and Bayelsa state governorship elections that kept the nation on
the brink.
Violence
has seemingly besmeared our politics inexorably because those who perpetrate it
to realise their political ambitions are never punished.They would have
their way and when they get to office, they are the ones who would
prate before the citizens about how much they love the country and in
fact, it is their love for their people that have made them to abandon their
thriving businesses and propelled them into public service.
It is not,
therefore, surprising that when these politicians get to the office, they would
not serve the people’s interest. They have invested blood and money to get
their positions. They would do anything to make their investments pay – of
course, only themselves. Now that it is clear that the path to the rerun
elections is paved with blood and tears, the police, other security agencies
and the government should take more interest in how to make the exercise
peaceful. We must not wait until more blood has been shed before we bewail our
bleak lot.
Apart from
protecting the lives of the citizens, such an intervention is
urgently needed to avoid discrediting the electoral process. For how can we
regard the electoral process as credible when the majority of the voters
do not participate in it because of the fear of violence ? Those who
use violence as a weapon of electoral victory easily write their own results
that mark them out as winners when others avoid the election because of
violence. It is not enough for politicians to lose the people’s mandate on the
electoral battlefield and latch on to technical reasons offered by a court
to be declared the winners of elections.
There must be a level playing field
for all stakeholders. In this regard, the government owes the citizens
the duty of stopping these senseless killings by politicians and their
surrogates. Neither the perpetrators of these murders nor the
government should take the patience of the victims for granted. If
the perpetrators would not voluntarily desist from these killings, the
government must stop them by meting out appropriate sanctions
to them and ensuring justice for the victims. Or else, through the
government’s inaction which may be covert complicity, the nation may be on the
path of proliferating killing fields.
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on the Editorial Board of the The Guardian where he also writes a weekly column that appears every Thursday
No comments:
Post a Comment