By Remi Oyeyemi
I have just finished reading the piece by Mr. Tunde Fagbenle
with the above title. I could not resist writing this rejoinder because I found
his view in the piece not just interesting but also annoying. I found it very
interesting that he has come out to admit what the followers and the “water
carriers” of President Muhammadu Buhari have been saying behind the doors
because of shame and regret while they go from door to door defending series of
indefensible in the public.
I found
it interesting that Mr. Fagbenle is balking at his ilk’s false propagation of
Buhari’s sainthood “so soon.” They called him the “messiah” and the “savior” of
Nigeria .
It is interesting that Mr. Fageble is not willing to wait until at least one
year anniversary of the tragic day when President Buhari’s second coming took
off. It is interesting that he believed that he could take some of us for a
ride – that he is just seeing the light - when this is not the case. He knows
it, and those who have been reading his contributions know it too.
Mr. Fagbenle is a man of letters. He is by every means a tutored man. I do not know much about him except through his writings. His writings without any doubt convey a mind that is gifted with intellect, circumspection, and insight. He understands that two plus two must equal four in simple arithmetic. He also knows that when two plus two is not equal to four, then jibiti or 419 is involved. So, to come out with the article under reference that he is surprised by the incompetence and the concomitant collapse being manifested by President Buhari is an insult to those who have been reading him.
The truth is that Mr. Fagbenle is part of the group who sold the idea of Buhari as President hook, line, and sinker when in fact they knew he has not the intellectual wherewithal to captain the ship of Nigeria. They dressed him in deceptive drapes of adequacy, insisting that he is “the man for the job.” They knew that his trajectory did not justify the confidence with which he was being invested. They were aware that then candidate Buhari would not be able to do the job. When Mr. Fagbenle and his fellow travelers were supporting Buhari, they knew what they were doing, but they had different calculations. So far the calculations have not worked out.
Mr. Fagbenle is a man of letters. He is by every means a tutored man. I do not know much about him except through his writings. His writings without any doubt convey a mind that is gifted with intellect, circumspection, and insight. He understands that two plus two must equal four in simple arithmetic. He also knows that when two plus two is not equal to four, then jibiti or 419 is involved. So, to come out with the article under reference that he is surprised by the incompetence and the concomitant collapse being manifested by President Buhari is an insult to those who have been reading him.
The truth is that Mr. Fagbenle is part of the group who sold the idea of Buhari as President hook, line, and sinker when in fact they knew he has not the intellectual wherewithal to captain the ship of Nigeria. They dressed him in deceptive drapes of adequacy, insisting that he is “the man for the job.” They knew that his trajectory did not justify the confidence with which he was being invested. They were aware that then candidate Buhari would not be able to do the job. When Mr. Fagbenle and his fellow travelers were supporting Buhari, they knew what they were doing, but they had different calculations. So far the calculations have not worked out.
It is weird that someone of Mr. Fagbenle’s erudition, intellect and circumspection could not figure out that someone such as Buhari who could not produce his certificate for the West African Examination Council (WAEC) would be able to correct all the anomalies in
*President Buhari |
In an obvious contradiction,
Mr. Fagbenle noted that the idea of a “new sheriff in town” helped to stabilize
the supply of power by the electric companies. He praised Buhari for the “sheer
attitudinal change by the same people who have over the years without
compunction frequently thrown us into darkness” arising from ‘fear’ of the new
Sheriff!” After observing that Nigerians earlier responded to assumed “positive
leadership” of Buhari, he then walloped Nigerians by insisting “The problem of Nigeria is Nigeria .”
Mr. Fagbenle awarded Buhari the marks for the “attitudinal change” of Nigerians
but absolved him of responsibility when things turned sour after a brief
period, insisting that “the problem of Nigeria is
not Buhari.” What a double speak!
When
Nigerians thought they had an honest, serious and competent leader in Buhari’s
first few weeks, they changed their attitude and things seemed to work as Mr.
Fagbenle pointed out. But as soon as Nigerians found out that they have been
sold a fake as a saint, they quickly reverted to their previous behaviors.
Nigerians quickly figured out that Buhari was not the messiah they have been
waiting for. Buhari proved that he has not been worthy of the trust,
confidence, and hope invested in him. Even, Mr. Fagbenle’s friend described
Buhari as a “lame dog that no one fears anymore and can be safely patted on its
head even by strangers!”
Then
Mr. Fagbenle put forth the obvious that “Very clearly PMB seems overwhelmed by
the enormity and complexity of the problems at hand.” The question here is that
is Mr. Fagbenle just finding out that Nigeria ’s
“problems” are of great “enormity and complexity?” Did he not know this when he
was singing the praises of Buhari in the days and weeks leading to the last
convention of the APC where a different candidate could have been chosen to
replace the hapless Goodluck Jonathan?
How
could he still insist that “the problem of Nigeria is
not Buhari” when Nigerians have reverted to their old ways after discovering
that Buhari is a toothless bulldog of a president? Why is it difficult for Mr.
Fagbenle to see that Nigeria ’s
need is really a serious and competent president with know-how in the basics of
governance? He complained that the Buhari’s administration is giving “excuses”
but he is also giving excuses for the failure of the Buhari’s incompetence by
rationalizing that “Buhari is of the old conservative mold.” Pray, what is
Buhari conserving now?
There
is no doubt that there exists in Nigeria in general and Yoruba land, in
particular, a group of writers, intellectual leaders, and professionals who are
secret sympathizers of Tinubuism – a mercantilist political philosophy – that
has as its only purpose the pursuit and attainment of political power for the
sake of sundry interests cocooned as national interest. They are collaborators
with the leading lights of Tinubuism to mislead the Yoruba Nation and by
extension, the country called Nigeria in
putting forward Buhari as the president of a complex country called Nigeria .
This
class of intelligentsia and the diabolical political class from Yoruba land,
swept the atrocities of Buhari against the leaders of Yoruba during the Second Republic under
the carpet. They allowed him to get away with it without any public apology to
the Yoruba Nation. They confused, misled and miseducated the youth and sold
Buhari to them as a “Saint” who would clean the Augean stable of corruption in Nigeria .
This group consciously glossed over the corruption, incompetence, injustice,
unfairness and deceit that have characterized the personal history of Buhari
and deodorized him as a messiah that would clean up Nigeria .
In the days leading to the last APC convention in Lagos and the 2015 Presidential Elections, it was apparent that what was happening is what Ambrose Bierce in his 1911 The Devil's Dictionary described as “A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles” and since Buhari took the reins of government in 2015 there is no doubt that we have been witnessing “The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.”
The APC political leaders in Yoruba land and across Nigeria as well as their collaborators who are writers, professionals, their sentries in academia, their moles in intelligentsia, literati and the glitterati began to manifest bankruptcy of character and integrity as they “change their party for the sake of their principles” (if at all, they had any), while others “change their principles for the sake of their party,” apology to Winston Churchill. Questions began to be asked as to what is going on? Critical minds saw the absence of principle and aridity of ideology as well as the aggressive pursuit of odious economic gains and political power at all costs.
This group and their political collaborators knew all the atrocities of Buhari, but they did not care. They were hoping they could use Buhari to attain power and then hold him hostage to be able to achieve their diabolical objectives. The leading lights of Tinubuism were warned including the man after whom this noxious political ideology is named. Their intellectual sentries were warned. History was presented to them as a guide. They were advised against making a terrible mistake that would come back to haunt
They were all warned and advised against choosing Buhari as the then candidate of the APC. But they insisted because obviously they had some secret plans. The leading lights of Tinubuism and their sentries were gallivanting all over, beating their chests and boasted as being the best “political strategists” God ever created. They ignored history. They corralled all those who for good reasons could not publicly endorse Buhari to do so. They spread enough “good will” around to win support for “Sai Baba.”
It is not true that “All of A Sudden Nothing is working,” as Mr. Fagbenle posited. The fact of the matter is that nothing ever worked since Buhari has taken the reins of power.
The plan of Tinubuists and their collaborators has not worked. It has failed. Woefully too. It has backfired. All those who played a role in foisting Buhari on
So far, the Buhari's administration has consolidated President Jonathan’s corruption and appropriated its modalities through sheer incompetence.
“In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility – I welcome it.”
- John F. Kennedy, in his Inaugural Address January 20, 1961
Please
follow me on Twitter: @OyeyemiRemi
No comments:
Post a Comment