By Tonnie Iredia
The National Judicial Council (NJC) is the body set-up by law to among other things discipline erring Nigerian judges. This was probably to prevent different agencies from harassing judges thereby boosting judicial autonomy. One would therefore have expected that the body would be up and doing in ensuring sanity in the Nigerian judiciary thereby giving no room for outsiders to pry into its internal matters.
But this has not been so. Instead, the NJC has for long shown that it is incapable of effectively performing the function. Many judges who have openly misbehaved to the chagrin of other sectors of the Nigerian society, often got off the hook. Some Nigerians actually believe that the NJC has acted more as a tool for covering-up erring judges on the basis of esprit de corps.
Bearing in mind that there are
many honest judges in Nigeria, it would be unfair to categorize our entire
judiciary as corrupt. But we can no longer say there are only a few bad eggs in
the system. Too many of our judges have over the years shown so much love for
the axiomatic primitive acquisition of wealth – an observation that is not just
an open secret but a global matter.
Former US secretary of state,
Hilary Clinton while submitting the 2011 Department of State’s Country report
stated that “Nigerian judges frequently failed to appear for trials, often
because they were pursuing other sources of income.” Nobody including those who
often describe the US as a busybody ever controverted the finding. So, it is
not just a case of politicians tempting judges, rather it is a case of some
judges eagerly positioning themselves to be tempted. It is therefore ridiculous
to waste time reporting erring judges to a sleeping NJC instead of simply
treating them as parties to a crime.
Times without number, as one poet once described
excessive frequency, the NJC has announced its decision to bar judges from
conflicting exparte orders by courts especially those of coordinate
jurisdiction. The judges neither listened nor heard the admonitions because that
infraction is reportedly the easiest source of getting money from politicians.
The NJC cannot claim to be unaware that it has not been effective in handling
reckless judges who erudite jurist and retired justice of the
supreme court, Samson Uwaifo see as no more judges but essentially thieves. At
his valedictory well over a decade ago, Uwaifo warned that “a corrupt judge, is
more harmful to the society than a man who runs amok with a dagger in a crowded
street.”
Nigeria ought not to have
ignored Uwaifo’s philosophy because the jurist also explained why a corrupt
judge could be a greater danger to society. According to the jurist, whereas
“the man with the dagger can be restrained physically, a corrupt judge
deliberately destroys the foundation of society” while no one sees the need to
restrain a judge who is not holding any visible weapon. What such judges
usually do is to deliberately subvert the will of the electorate through
manipulation as some appeal court judges did recently while handling election cases
in states such as Kano and Plateau. Following Uwaifo, those are no longer
judges that should face the infantile gloves of the NJC. A proper investigation
should be undertaken by the anti-corruption agencies for those found culpable
to be immediately and properly penalized.
In other words, the nation has since moved beyond the convoluted processes and procedures deliberately elongated to offer cover to colleagues. Instructive facts were given by the Supreme Court itself. To start with, the apex court has retrieved the 165,000 ballots which were earlier stolen from one candidate so that another can be declared winner. Even if the ballots were not duly stamped as required by law why would innocent voters be sanctioned?
In another case, it has also been established
that the political party that was sanctioned for disobeying court order
actually obeyed the order asking it to redo its primary election. Third, the
court of appeal has been found to be acting as a member of one political party
by getting involved in its internal affairs in breach of a Supreme Court
decision barring courts from getting involved in the internal affairs of any
political party.
Indeed, the story has now gone
beyond the problems experienced by a few states on account of judicial indiscretion.
Right now, there is already evidence of collateral damage as epitomized by
happenings in Plateau state. Following the judgment of the apex court which
described as perverse the attempt to seize 16 PDP seats and handover to APC,
the speaker of the state house of assembly, Gabriel Dewan, has declared that he
would not grant recognition for 16 APC candidates, thereby creating a stalemate
in the state. Does Dewan have a right to disobey the court of appeal which
decided that the APC is the winner of the seats? Can any right thinking
lawmaker especially a presiding officer happily obey a judgment described as
perverse by the apex court?
Different people have reacted
differently to the subject. There are conservative analysts who believe that it
was improper for the apex court to have pronounced on the matter because it is
trite that a court lacks the vires to determine a matter that is not before it.
The argument is that since the governorship cases of Kano, Plateau and Zamfara
states were by regulation expected to end at the level of the court of appeal,
the apex court has no business commenting on them. Another group is happy that
the apex court has exposed the materialism at the court of appeal adding that
what matters is that having now known the truth we should all condemn the
appeal court for its travesty. In fact, there has been a clap for the flogging
of the appeal court justices with horsewhip recently nicknamed judicial
koboko
Unfortunately, the flogging is
too little for the amount of damage done. Apart from the stalemate at the
Plateau state house of assembly, there are impostors in the national assembly
elected not by the Plateau people but by the judiciary. This partly puts us at
a junction where judges should be made to account for their misdeeds. The
appeal court deliberately caused the problem and neither those wrongly favoured
by the perverse judgment nor the judges who deliberately did it should be
spared. Two suggestions are up here. The first is to investigate what informed
the wrong decision and penalize all those found wanting. The second which is
more complicated is to use the position of the supreme court to correct the
mistake. Should we apply the famous doctrine of necessity which we nebulously
fall back to, all the time even when what to do is clearly
documented?
In the meantime, there is need
for a better approach to democracy and elections in Nigeria. In the first
place, rather than castigate dissatisfied losers, it makes a lot of sense to
appreciate that our elections are never free and fair. Consequently, those who
wear long faces for so long are not the problem. The arrest of 38 women
protesters in Nasarawa arrested a few days ago for protesting the decisions
concerning the governorship elections are assumed to be criminals. Do we know
what they know? Is it not better to make our electoral body defend its actions
and conclusions? Why did INEC conveniently forget to stamp thousands of ballot
papers in one state? Why was our pampered electoral body that is known for its
partisanship neither questioned nor any of its relevant officials subjected to
some judicial koboko whips?
There is no better time than now
to deal decisively with persons and bodies making it hard for Nigeria to attain
free and elections. In particular, the judiciary that is now known to be the
most dangerous factor should not be spared. This is more so when the apex court
we are relying on today to chastise lower courts can at certain times deliver
inexplicable judgments. As one of their late members, Justice Chima Nweze
predicted in 2020, the decision of the apex court to allocate more votes than
voters to a particular candidate so as to declare him winner is still haunting
the court till today. It is therefore time for our judges to be accountable.
*Dr. Iredia,
former Director-General of the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), is a public
intellectual
No comments:
Post a Comment