By Olu Fasan
One of the popular myths around Bola Tinubu, stemming from his time as governor of Lagos State, was that he had an uncanny ability to pick competent teams of technocrats to run the affairs of state. Indeed, some genuinely wanted Tinubu to be president and “run Nigeria as he ran Lagos.” But the myths have busted since he became president. Not only has he muddled through policy after policy, the famed gift for talent-spotting gravely eluded him as he unveiled a middling cast of ministers, characterised by two fundamental flaws.
First, Tinubu will have the largest cabinet in Nigeria’s political history. With 48 ministers and over 20 special advisers and senior special assistants, with cabinet-level status, Tinubu will have the most bloated and unwieldy cabinet of any past president.
Second, he will be the most prebendal president in Nigeria’s history. Of course, politics and governance in Nigeria have always been based on patronage and clientage networks, as Richard Joseph points out in his book Democracy and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria. But Tinubu has taken “prebendalism”, defined as granting public offices as political rewards, to dizzying heights. At a time when poverty ravages and immiserates Nigerians, Tinubu carves out a harvest field for political jobbers.Put simply, Tinubu’s incoming ministers fall into three categories. In the first category are those he rewarded for facilitating his emergence as his party’s presidential candidate and for winning votes to make him president. In the second category are election losers who Tinubu gives a political platform to consolidate and try again. Finally, the third category: Tinubu’s long standing political cronies in Lagos and nationally. You will notice I did not mention technocrats. That’s because there’s no real technocrat in Tinubu’s incoming cabinet. Really? Yes! Well, let’s discuss the point.
Who is a technocrat? A technocrat is someone who practises “technocracy”, who uses technical expertise to further the common good. But while technocrats in government must have political skills, that is, able to persuade others to adopt policies needed to further the general good, they cannot be politicians. Why? Because technocracy can’t work under the crude rules of politics: lies, dishonesty, intrigues, round-the-clock politicking. Yet, most of Tinubu’s “technocrats” are practising politicians.
Take Adebayo Adelabu, a former
deputy-governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria. He’s an obvious technocrat. But
he was APC’s gubernatorial candidate in Oyo State in 2019. After losing the APC
governorship primaries last year, he decamped to the Accord Party and ran
unsuccessfully for governorship again this year. Now, Tinubu has made Adelabu a
minister, but he still wants to be governor of Oyo State. Fine, but if he’s a
minister over the next four years, he would juggle the demands of his ministerial
job with politicking. That’s not technocracy!
The same goes for all the
politically-ambitious “technocrats” in Tinubu’s incoming cabinet, including
former Governor Adegboyega Oyetola of Osun State, who lost his re-election bid
in 2022 but wants to run again in 2026. Truth is, politically-ambitious
technocrats won’t focus whole-heartedly on actual governing and policy-making;
rather, they would be distracted by political considerations. So, as the
definition of technocrats goes, they are not technocrats! Even those
“technocrats” without political ambitions are too personally close to Tinubu to
be true technocrats. When technocracy and personal loyalty to Tinubu clash,
they will bow to the latter.
In her book Reforming the Unreformable, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala wrote that barely two weeks into being President Olusegun Obasanjo’s finance minister in 2003, she wrote her letter of resignation because of certain decision that Obasanjo took. She was later persuaded to withdraw the letter. How many of Tinubu’s “technocrats” can put technocratic integrity above personal interests or loyalty?
Okonjo-Iweala was
headhunted, as real technocrats are, but Tinubu’s “technocrats” are part of his
echo chamber, his bubble! Which brings us to the political rewardees. Truth is,
Tinubu is indebted to many benefactors: from Nasir el-Rufai and his then fellow
Northern APC governors who torpedoed the party’s plan to impose a consensus
presidential candidate, which would have scuppered Tinubu’s bid, to the
presidential aspirants who stepped down for him during the primaries, creating
a momentum that led to his success.
As for the presidential election
itself, Tinubu owed those who won votes, or played other roles for his
”victory”, a matter currently before the presidential election tribunal,
ultimately heading to the Supreme Court. Tinubu has now rewarded most of the
power brokers with ministerial positions. There are nine former governors in
his incoming cabinet. In its commendable investigative journalism, Premium
Times has shown how utterly undeserving most of the former governors are, with
many facing serious corruption allegations and one notorious for being an
accomplice to the massive looting by Sani Abacha, the brutal military
dictator.
Then, there’s El-Rufai, the driving force behind Tinubu’s Muslim-Muslim ticket, introduced to serve personal and political agendas, with utter disregard for the longstanding consensus to maintain a balance between Christianity and Islam in Nigeria. Recently, El-Rufai called for Islamic domination of governance in Nigeria, saying Muslims had the numbers. The Senate screening committee has withheld his confirmation over security checks, but Tinubu will ensure he’s confirmed as he did for Festus Keyamo.
Given their toxic politics, nothing qualifies El-Rufai
and Keyamo as ministers beyond their “contribution” to Tinubu’s “victory”. But
all this shows that Tinubu is utterly weak and beholden to others. Even in the
South-West, his supposed political base, Tinubu secured only 54 per cent of the
votes in February’s presidential election. Ayo Fayose, former Ekiti State
governor, said Tinubu won Ekiti because of him, and won Oyo State because of
Governor Seyi Makinde.
Thus, without Fayose and Makinde, members of Nyesom Wike’s PDP rebel group, Tinubu would probably have won less than 50 per cent in the South-West.
In the North, Tinubu wouldn’t have
secured the decisive, albeit controversial, 5.6 million votes, despite winning
only seven of the 19 states, without the Muslim-Muslim ticket and the machinations
of some Northern APC governors. For someone who won just 8.8 million votes in a
country of 213 million people, and rejected by 17 million voters, Tinubu should
have been humble enough to form a cabinet comprising many of Nigeria’s best and
brightest. Instead, he opted for discreditable politicians, fawning cronies and
co-opted or politically-ambitious” technocrats”. They can’t turn Nigeria
around!
*Fasan is a commentator on public issues
No comments:
Post a Comment