By Emmanuel Aziken
Against the background of dashed hopes and the intrigues that shadowed the conduct of the 2023 presidential election, it is difficult for anyone with a clear conscience to rush to the defence of Prof Mahmood Yakubu, the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.
*Prof YakubuGiven that Yakubu is a professor of history, it is telling that historians will in the immediate and distant future easily pick him out as a facilitator in the conspiracy to suppress what many had projected would be the beginning of the Nigerian renaissance in the third decade of the 21st century. What with the promised hopes that spurred many Nigerians who had in the past not voted, to on February 25, 2023, take that first step in their civic responsibility to enthrone good governance.
Indeed, anyone coming out to defend Professor
Yakubu would also be faced with the challenge of situating the fact as
reflected on this page last week that many Nigerians abroad travelled at great
cost to exercise their franchise. They came home with the hope of having a good
leadership that they could be proud of anywhere they are based in the world.
The cost was also internal. It cost the
Nigerian treasury nothing less than N400 billion to orgnaise what many have now
come to see as a fraud. While that is the direct cost to the Nigerian treasury,
the cost on businesses and individuals could even be more in financial terms.
Another significant cost that may even make it more difficult for anyone with a
conscience to defend Prof Yakubu is the cost in terms of lives and property.
There have been reports of loss of lives on
account of the election. While Prof Yakubu may not be directly held liable on
account of the fact that security is not directly under his remit, there have
also been reports of some people who lost their lives or limbs on account of
the poor performance of Prof Yakubu.
There is a report which your correspondent has
not established of a young man who took his life in Plateau State on account of
the malpractises that shadowed the presidential election.
Another cost is the reputation of the
academics involved in what some have alleged as the charade orchestrated by
Prof Yakubu.
Though Prof Yakubu did not start the use of
Professors as returning and collation officers, there is, however, no question
that it is under his regime at INEC that men and women of the ivory tower
started getting sullied as election riggers.
Mr Mike Igini has sent a couple to jail but by
and large, the majority of those who participated in the electoral heist of
February 25 from the Ivory tower remain unpunished. Some of them with a modicum
of conscience have recanted. One of such is Professor Ibrahim Yakassai who
served as returning officer in the Doguwa Federal Constituency in Kano who
renounced the result he declared saying he did it under duress.
The case of the academics involved in the
election in Rivers State have been shadowed with much drama with some of them
alleging death threats on account of their activities.
We do not know where the death threats are
coming from. However, what is obvious and makes a defence for Prof Yakubu even
more difficult is the irony that has shadowed results from Rivers State.
The collation officer for Port-Harcourt LGA,
Professor Omiete Briggs, was replaced after she reportedly offered to step down
following death threats from those who wanted her to alter the result from the
state.
Suffice it to say that Port Harcourt LGA was
one of the areas where many believe the results reflected the vote at the
polling booths. Peter Obi scored 80% of the votes, Atiku Abubakar 9% and Bola
Tinubu 7%. The results reflected the expectations of many as against the trend
in many other places in the state where Tinubu who was backed by Governor
Nyesom Wike polled heavy votes despite the poor attendance of his rally in Port
Harcourt.
Indeed, in Wike’s Obio-Akpor LGA, results on
INEC Portal showed LP:70,186, APC:12,547. Meanwhile in computing the final
result declared by Prof Yakubu that gave victory to Tinubu, INEC announced
something different with APC: 80,239, LP: 3,829.
Indeed, the infraction in Obio Akpor is only
one of the malfeasances that characterized the elections conducted by Prof
Yakubu that makes it difficult for anyone with a conscience to defend the INEC
chairman.
Indeed, one could be tempted to defend Yakubu
in the sense that for the first time votes counted in several National Assembly
constituencies with sitting governors losing the bid to advance to the Senate.
The defeat of the governors tells us that
Yakubu has the blueprint to conduct a good election. However, in the more
significant election of the president, Yakubu allowed what the commission
termed as technical glitches to erode his credibility.
Indeed, this correspondent had thought to
attempt a defence of Yakubu in the sense that he is a human being and may
have made mistakes. Your correspondent has also heard that he was under compulsion
from authorities who appointed him with the threat of blackmail over him.
However,
after an examination of the highs and lows and what could be a threat to the
Nigerian renaissance, your correspondent will join men with conscience in
setting the INEC chairman in the negative corridor of Nigerian history. Indeed,
the gloom over the nation since Yakubu did his midnight duty of penultimate
Tuesday forbids for anyone to justify or align with Yakubu in his journey
towards the negative side of history.
*Aziken is a
commentator on public issues
No comments:
Post a Comment