By Femi Falana
In concluding his brilliant article on “Unknown Soldiers Before Unknown Gunmen”, Owei Lakemfa referred to the verdict of a tribunal which claimed that the Ransome-Kuti’s residence was set ablaze by an “unknown soldier”.
*Falana
The Supreme Court of Nigeria questioned the verdict for blaming the “unknown soldier” in place of the State whose soldiers had perpetrated the crime. Thus, in the leading judgement of the apex court in the celebrated case of Chief Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti & Ors v Attorney-General of the Federation (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt 6) 124, Kayode Eso JSC said: “This immunity attaching to the State in this country is sad.” The learned trial judge who took evidence described the scene that day as “hell let loose” and this he had set out in his analysis of the evidence.
He said: “It is beyond dispute, of course, that
many soldiers, a witness gave the figure of 1,000, surrounded the entire
buildings, hurling stones and broken bottles. Many of them got inside the
building, set fire to it as well as the generator in the compound. This is
bad. It should not be right that once the actual perpetrators could not be
determined, the State, whose soldiers these perpetrators are could not be made
liable.” But then as I said the immunity of the State persisted at the time of
the incident.
As it is the 1963 Constitution that governs this case I
have made special study of the provisions that I believe may be applied to
exclude this immunity. S.22 is the closest but then it deals only with
determination of rights and talks about fair hearing being within a reasonable
time. The complaint here is not that the appellants did not have fair hearing.
No provision has helped. Happily for the country, but this does
not affect the instant case, section 6 of the 1979 Constitution which vests the
judicial powers of the country in the court has to my mind removed this
anachronism.
Even though the Ransome-Kuti family lost the case on the
technical ground of the “King Can Do No Wrong”, the Nigerian people
gained from the case. It was because the Supreme Court held that the State can
be sued for human rights abuse that the Federal Government is regularly dragged
before the Court for the extrajudicial killing, torture and brutalisation of
citizens carried out by known and unknown soldiers. As far as the law is
concerned, unknown soldiers are agents of the State!
*Falana, SAN, a human rights lawyer, wrote from Lagos
No comments:
Post a Comment