There is a growing acceptance in
*Buhari and Atiku |
For avoidance of the doubt, the global backlash under reference herein is not the recent remarks of the American President Donald Trump which captured the Nigerian President as lifeless but this discourse is on the new revelations by two of the world’s leading financial houses, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, popularly called HSBC and the International Monetary Fund as well as the Economic Intelligence Unit of The Economist.
First, the economic assessment and prediction
on Nigeria by the HSBC after taking a firm analytical look at several sectors
of the Nigerian economy, the political situation in the country, electoral
uncertainty and macro risks including examining the recent power play and
defections in the political arena, the International financial organisation
reached a very gloomy conclusion on the future of the nation.
Specifically, the report noted that “a second
term for Mr Buhari, however, raises the risk of limited economic progress and
further fiscal deterioration, prolonging the stagnation of his first term,
particularly if there is no move towards completing reform of the exchange rate
system or fiscal adjustments that diversify government revenues away from oil”.
The particular aspect of the HSBC report that
captured the attention of most Nigerians is where it noted that ‘Buhari will
once again lead the APC into the 2019 elections, although his approval ratings
sit near all-time lows and this largely reflects the impact of Nigeria’s
painful recession in 2016-17 and the sustained economic hardship that has
accompanied his presidency, including rapidly rising joblessness and poverty’.
As expected, there has been a lot of uproar
from the Buhari administration on the report published by HSBC. As usual, the
government, through its so-called ministry of information that serves well as
an organ of misinformation, released skewed and twisted statistics through its
channels. Their conclusion was that the HSBC report was influenced by the
opposition politicians. This is really sad because the report took a look at
the issues that will be on the front burner for those seeking to run for
President, made highlights of Nigeria ’s
economic situation under President Buhari and tabled their observations.
Indeed, for anyone with secondary school
education on basic economics, the points raised by HSBC were very comprehensive
and real. Thus, for any focused government alive to its responsibilities and
governance challenges, what obviously should have been needed is a convincing
logic that some policy adjustments would be made to address the observed
negative indices.
Instead, what Buhari’s information managers
did was to discredit glaring facts from the highly reputable global agency. How
such actions have addressed the many worries of the large section of the
Nigerian public is yet to be seen especially in assuaging citizens traumatised
situation of hopelessness in a distressed economy which the same administration
induced.
In addition to the HSBC report which dwelt on
the many minuses on corruption fight, the security concerns that persist across
the country with the Boko Haram insurgency in the North East, militant
activities that have disrupted oil production in the Niger Delta and more
recently escalating violence between assumed cattle herdsmen and communities,
the latest is the IMF report which has equally given Nigeria under Buhari, a
very negative appraisal during the recent Annual General Meetings of the
IMF/World Bank in Bali, Indonesia, where Nigeria’s growth prospects were
revised downwards in 2018 from 2.1 per cent to 1.9 per cent with prediction
that inflation rate in Nigeria would increase to 13.5 per cent next year.
Sadly, however, the spokespersons of the
Nigerian President, against the backdrop of these damming reports in their
usual manner, responded to these observations even without digesting the
contents. In their rushed judgement, they stated that HSBC was a corrupt and
biased institution which had even allegedly been laundering money for corrupt
Nigerian politicians. Typically, their references had no connection with
addressing the raised fundamental economic defects and likely dangers to our
economy. Rather Buhari’s spokespersons wallowed in the usual finger pointing
and name calling accusations, which has been the hallmark of the Buhari
administration’s media and propaganda response to constructive criticism.
For many genuine close watchers of the Buhari
administration, it is not surprising that these disturbing remarks by the HSBC
and IMF portraying Nigeria
as a country heading for economic doom were released within a few months of
each other. Could this be another conspiracy of the PDP?
The reading public does not need any egghead
in economics to inform them that the present government has been leading them
on a path of deceit and that which it sadly preaches to be changed by every
reasonable imagination or reality is now an economic catastrophe that has
impoverished Nigerians, introduced hungry and anger that has culminated to
various forms of avoidable violent agitations in many sections if the country.
The message herein is that those that speak
for government must realise that they owe the public a sacrosanct duty of
conveying facts rather falsehoods as the earnings and comforts they enjoy in
their hollowed offices are provided from hard-earned taxpayers” money. Indeed,
it amounts to crass and unforgivable disrespect for Nigerian citizens when
those who act as the mouthpiece of the government engage in reeling out lies to
cover very important issues that affect the overall economic situation of the
country.
Simply put, if it is true, as has been often
reported and widely speculated that President Buhari, either by circumstance of
his unstable health or the more plausible lack of modernity does not find
energy nor appetite to browse the internet for news except those conveyed by
his aides and associates before taking decisions, then what this suggests is
that the cause of the present failed economic situation is a shared blame
between the Nigerian President and those that process information for him.
Certainly, any Nigerian that still believes that this Buhari government has the
capacity to reverse the predictions of these renowned International financial
organisations, must be a member of inner circle of the administration that
feeds fat on corruption, injustice, nepotism or crass clannishness , which has
now been established as the approach of leadership of the administration.
Otherwise, common sense is sufficient to
suggest that any country with people that repeat the error of electing rulers
that have the capacity to thrust their nation into a huge economic mess as
depicted in the analysis of these credible financial institutions, should also
be ready to face the consequences that usually confront failed states. Indeed,
any democratic nation that fails to adhere to wise counsel should also be
prepared to confront the likely anarchy and lawlessness that come with
citizens’ revolt in times of economic hardship especially under a government
like that of today’s Nigeria will never change for good.
This is really why Nigerians must rethink
their choice of Buhari come 2019 by seeking a viable, active, cosmopolitan
replacement with someone who can independently assess and access information,
not just on a pragmatic and functional need to know basis, but indeed on what
would work best for a nation in dire need of credible restructuring. This is
where Atiku Abubakar fits in well and is by far the best and right man for this
time in Nigeria .
The comfort for Nigerians is that all hopes
are not lost as the era of leadership with information manipulation, deceit and
no vision seems over especially with the emergence of Alhaji Abubakar Atiku as
the Presidential candidate of the PDP.
Certainly, Atiku’s precedence in successful
business management and fair-play will ensure that a formidable opposition that
has the capacity to change the story of Nigerians from hopelessness to
prosperity is a new option for Nigeria .
May the votes of well-meaning Nigerians count
in the elections of 2019.
*Shaibu, a public
communication consultant writes from Abuja
No comments:
Post a Comment