Perhaps, excepting the imprints of the unruly events that started
happening and later snowballed into the Nigeria ’s
Civil War in the late 1960’s, the portraiture of Nigeria
today as a drifting democracy in black Africa
has not been more appropriate and worrisome.
Though the times and details of the conflicts might vary, the commonalities in the settings derive largely from the wanton destruction of lives and property by felons who first appear faceless, but whose identification soon exposes the troubling ineptitude of the nation’s authorities to either apprehend them or stem the raging tides of waste of lives, property and values which the culprits willfully unleash on their hapless victims.
*Nwodo |
Though the times and details of the conflicts might vary, the commonalities in the settings derive largely from the wanton destruction of lives and property by felons who first appear faceless, but whose identification soon exposes the troubling ineptitude of the nation’s authorities to either apprehend them or stem the raging tides of waste of lives, property and values which the culprits willfully unleash on their hapless victims.
The situation in
review encourages and sustains the wide speculations of complacency or even
connivance by the powers that be with these nation’s harbingers of doom. An
indictment on state authorities, therefore!
Over time, some
persons and groups, driven by genuine concern for a sustainable Nigeria , have spoken out loudly on the need for
reappraisal of the tenets of Nigeria ’s
quaky avowals of democracy and nationhood.
Today, more than ever
in the history of Nigeria ,
voices of resent and dissent are emerging and resonating across the expansive
geopolitical space of the country. Severally and jointly, these voices demand a
new conversation on project-Nigeria.
From the Yoruba in the
South West to the Ijaw, the Urhobo, the Ibibio and other ethnic nationalities
of the South South; from the Tiv, the Idoma, the Igala, the Igede, the Berom
and other ethnic nationalities of the Middle Belt, to the Igbo in the South
East, and in other places, arise voices expressive of simmering grudges that
had endured over time: clear voices that can no longer be banished to perpetual
hibernation in limbo.
These unite in
condemnation of brazen entrenchment of ethnic sentiments in wielding national
political influences and powers; they speak against gross perpetration of
injustice by a section of the country to other sections of the federating
units.
The LCM of the
conversations is a rejuvenated demand for a discussion among the peoples of Nigeria on the
tenets of the country’s unification.
However, of note is
that while at different times and fora the leaderships of majority of the
federating ethnic nationalities have lent strong support to the country’s
restructuring, the Northern leadership has maintained a code of silence that
appears conspiratorial.
This might just be the
singular reason the country still suffers the pains of the moment.
Observing this
sustained absence of a notable voice from the core North supportive of
restructuring, Senator Abraham Adesanya, in his April, 2003 ‘Foreword’ to Chief
Bisi Akande’s invaluable compilation, Restructuring, Nigeria’s Approach to True
Federalism, noted that, ‘At the root of the refusal to allow a restructured
Nigeria is the desire of a section of the country to continue to exploit the
resources of other sections without compunction, or how do we explain the fact
that the North, which supported the principle of derivation in 1954, now
refuses to accept the same principle? Did the same North not support
confederation arrangement in 1951? Could it be because
petroleum has taken the place of groundnuts and leather?’
The effects of boldly
or slyly refusing to sincerely address such posers as the respected senator’s
have continually exposed the hypocrisy among our national leaders in professing
‘One Indivisible Nigeria.’
On Monday, May 21,
2018, at Alex Ekwueme Square, Awka, the utmost socio-cultural and non-partisan
authority on Igbo cause, the Ohanaze Ndigbo Worldwide, convoked a summit
wherein Ndigbo, in unmistakable terms, declared strong preferences for the
restructuring of the Nigerian Federation as the only panacea to the stuttering
and indulgent attempts or pretences that the country keeps making towards
nationhood over the years.
Ohaneze presented
proposals on how such restructuring could be attained.
Governor Willie Obiano
of Anambra State again provided committed
leadership to Ndigbo at a critical moment in their history by not only
willingly hosting the very crucial Ndigbo Summit, but heightening the tone of
the conversation in his very inspiring welcome address.
Positing that ‘Every
nation on earth is a work in progress’ the governor maintained that, ‘Citizens
of both advanced and developing countries continue to ask their countries hard
questions that will lead them to a better federation, a better nation and a
better society. And Nigeria
cannot be an exception.’
The historic event
availed Ndigbo a moment of solemn reminiscence and rumination over their
trodden paths.
It impelled them to
endorse profound projections and suggestions on how to effect equitable
participation among the ethnic nationalities in a progressive Nigeria .
The ‘Ekwueme Square
Declaration,’ a well articulated document which the summit endorsed, expresses
the position of Ndigbo in Nigeria ’s
renewed quest for sustainable nationhood.
It therefore became
Igbo’s adopted document on a Nigeria
nation that compulsorily needs restructuring.
Qualifying the premium
essence of the summit and its apposite timing are the high profile attendance
and enthusiastic participation spread across the five major Igbo speaking
states of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu
and Imo; and the two contiguous states of Delta and Rivers, a good percentage
of whose populations speak Igbo.
Participating also
were other ethnic nationalities in Nigeria
who warmly share the Igbo cause for a sustainable Nigeria
nation; these, through their impressive representations at the summit, made
far-reaching remarks and submissions in defence of restructuring as the
singular way out of Nigeria ’s
long rigmarole in the woods of political indiscretion.
All freely spoke in
one voice against the sustained lopsidedness in the application of state powers
in favour of ethnic dominance of a particular group or groups to the detriment
of a greater majority of other Nigerians.
In observance of the
primacy of God in the realisation of a sustainable nation the tone of discourse
in the summit was set by the clergy who after chastising Ndigbo for their
preponderant and often reckless clamour for material acquisitions, exhorted
them to sincerely seek the face of God for solutions to Nigeria’s multifarious
problems.
The Ekwueme Square
Declaration was ingeniously presented by Professor Chukwuma Charles Soludo, the
Chairman, Planning & Strategy Committee and Organising Committee of the
Ndigbo Summit.
It expounds the gray
areas in the perceptions of the national leadership in Nigeria , and the oddities in the country’s
Constitution that hardly represents the true interests of majority of the
diverse peoples of Nigeria
on the terms of association as federating units.
It demands a new
Constitution that would truly be the peoples’ and not the contrivance of a
select interest group.
It demands a National
Conference with the statutory powers to effect change in or of the Federal
Constitution.
It advocates a
Referendum as a valid way of instituting a true Federal Constitution.
The Ekwueme Square
Declaration advocates among other fundamental issues, a six year single tenure
for the Presidency which would rotate between the North and South in agreement
with the generally adopted geopolitical map of the country.
It also advocates five
Vice Presidents coming from the zones that do not produce the president.
*Anarado wrote from
Adazi-Nnukwu.
No comments:
Post a Comment