As the administration
of the President Muhammadu Buhari lurches into the twilight amid the
fast-vanishing possibility of securing a second mandate, it flails in all
directions in search of survival. It is striving currently to make the poor
among us to accept as reality the illusion that it can ratchet up their
fortunes in the remaining days.
It is an unrelieved illusion because since the
administration has failed in three years to improve the lot of the people, it
cannot in less than one year secure the acumen to accomplish this. Rather, the
citizens should steel themselves for the prospect of their immiseration
reaching its nadir in the remaining period of this administration.
Clearly, the plan by the Buhari government to
pay N5,000 to each poor citizen cannot stave off this spectre. This amount is
to be received by each poor citizen when the government shares the $322 million
(about N98.2 billion) Abacha loot repatriated from *Gen Abacha |
Yes, we appreciate the fact that the magic of perpetually eliminating the
poorest of the poor from society is still elusive to mankind. Not even the
self-styled socialist societies of yore nor the current pretenders to the
throne of collective good have been able to banish poverty . But if the Buhari
government had built on or retained the economy as bequeathed to it by the
Jonathan government, there would be no need for this plan of giving pittances
to the poor. The poor citizens would have been able to eke out a living no
matter how hard it is. Hence, what the Buhari government has embarked upon is
an indication of its lack of ideas on governance and the management of the
economy .
Through this plan, the government has
demonstrated its unabashed transformation of dilettantism into a staple of
governance in the Buhari era. Here, we should remember Buhari’s proclivity for
the canonisation of Abacha. Or have we forgotten that Buhari has consistently
maintained that Abacha is only being pilloried by some misguided citizens who
have failed to reckon with the great legacies of his good governance ? To
Buhari, Abacha did not fit the mould of a kleptomaniac that roils the public
imagination . But Buhari is yet to explain to us the fact of the recovery of
Abacha’s loot that he would share to poor citizens. It thus becomes necessary
that before Buhari even contemplates sharing the loot, he should discharge this
moral burden. Buhari should apologise to the citizens for consistently
afflicting them with the canard that Abacha was a moral exemplar who has only
been maligned by his ever-increasing league of implacable traducers.
After this apology, the Buhari government
should rethink its plan of sharing the recovered loot. In the first place, we
are repulsed at the byzantine template through which the Buhari government has
determined who are the poor among us. Since we cannot by any stretch of the
imagination be persuaded that such a template privileges transparency and
altruism, we are only left with the suspicion that the eventual destinations of
the money are the private pockets of Buhari’s aides under the guise of giving
it to the poor. Even if the money is really to be given out, it would only go
to the supporters of the All Progressives Congress government as a down payment
for votes in the next election. Again, if the money really gets to the poor
among the citizens it would serve no purpose. It cannot improve their lives.
What kind of business can N5,000 be used for ? This amount is not useful to a
poor citizen who is contending with the challenges of food, shelter and the
education of his or her children. If the Buhari government genuinely spares a
thought for the poor, there is a better way of demonstrating this. The poor do
not need handouts. They are aware that the nation is endowed with resources
that could guarantee an abundant life for them. What they want is an equitable
distribution of these resources. They want to be given the best medical
attention like Buhari and his family when they are sick. It is not only Buhari
and his son who should be flown abroad at the nation’s expense when they are
sick. It is not only Buhari’s aides and lawmakers they should enjoy the
abundance of the land. Does Buhari really expect an indigene of the Niger Delta
to applaud him because he wants to give him or her N5,000 from the oil revenue
Abacha stole from him or her? This citizen is already weighed down by
sicknesses and diseases inflicted by oil companies. He or she chokes under
blindness, cancer, bareness, etc. The N5,000 cannot take care of these
sicknesses. While this is their lot, those who exploit the oil resources in
their land are billionaires who are living life to the hilt.
What the poor need to improve their lot is more serious than the escapist idea
of giving them N5,000 each. The government should rather think of real policies
to improve their lives. The government should give them a secure environment.
The farm of a poor beneficiary is not safe for him to return and deploy the
money. If he or she uses the money to plant crops, Fulani herdsmen are waiting
in the wings to unleash their cows on them. Also, a secure environment would
attract investors who would provide employment opportunities for the poor. But
how would investors come to the Nigerian environment that is riven with
killings and official corruption?
Instead of the government making the recovered
loot vulnerable to being re-looted, it could be deployed in ways that would
redound to creative thinking and good governance. It should be used to
prosecute a campaign of adult literacy. Or such a campaign could focus on
removing our youths from their mobile phones and television sets and taking
them back to the libraries. Our youths should be made to be more enamoured of
the pleasures of reading a 500-page fictional or non-fictional work than
dissipating their time and energies on selfies and inundating their minds with
the drivel on their phones. The money could be used to improve or build a
library each in the 774 local government areas of the country. About N126.88
million that would accrue to each local government out of the N98.2 billion is
enough to achieve this.
Apart from the education of the youths and
weaning them off anti-social predilections, such libraries could serve another
purpose. Each could be called Sani Abacha Loot Library. Or the government could
use the money to sponsor free cancer treatment for all citizens at the
Universities of Lagos and Ibadan and Ahmadu Bello
University and University of Nigeria ,
Nsukka . The cancer centre in each of the universities should bear the name,
Sani Abacha Loot Cancer Centre. Such a name would serve as a searing rebuke to
the memory of the late thieving military dictator and a warning to the living
that they could also have their names emblazoned in the hall of infamy if they
take the kleptocratic route of Abacha while pretending to serve the citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment