Exactly 25 years ago, a
landmark election was held in Nigeria
after ten long years of military rule. There were two main
contestants: Moshood Abiola of the Social Democratic Party and Bashir Tofa of
the National Republican Convention. Abiola was from the South-west: Tofa
from the North-west.
*Gen Abacha, MKO Abiola, Bola Tinubu (behind Abacha) |
Although the results of the
election have never been officially certified, nevertheless, they are well
known and readily-accessible. Abiola won with 8,243,209 votes; while Tofa
lost with 5,982,087 votes.
The election was annulled by
the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida. The INEC of the day was not
allowed to declare the result officially. Abiola was subsequently
arrested by another usurper military ruler, Sani Abacha; and he died
mysteriously while still in government detention. As a result, the country was
plunged into a political crisis that took another seven years to resolve.
But even that resolution failed to address the real reason why it was felt
necessary to annul the election. The issue was patched-up in 1999 by the
agreement that the next president of
The present government of
President Buhari has now decided to recognize the victory of M.K.O. Abiola in
the 1993 election. It has declared that henceforth Democracy Day will no
longer be celebrated as a public holiday on May 29 but on June 12, the day of
that 1993 election. M.K.O. Abiola has also been awarded illegally the
posthumous national honour of Grand Commander of the Federal
Republic , GCFR; the highest national
honour in Nigeria .
However, what the government has not done, and what it will not do, is to make
official the result of the 1993 election.
The 1993 election was annulled
because of the results. It was annulled because it was free and
fair. The election was annulled because a free and fair election in Nigeria is
unacceptable to the powers-that-be in the North. You need to know the
reason behind this, and I will endeavour to tell you. President Babangida and
his Northern cohorts had no problem with Abiola becoming the president of Nigeria in
1993. They did not expect him to win and were surprised that he
won. But if they did not want him to be president, they would not have
allowed him to be on the ballot in the first place. What they found
unacceptable was what his victory revealed.
It was in their interest to ensure
that this did not come to the general knowledge of Nigerians. By still refusing
to certify the 1993 election results, while getting accolades in some quarters
for finally admitting officially that Abiola was the winner, the present
Nigerian government is still determined that the truth revealed by the election
results should not be known. In effect, the rehabilitation of the 1993
election in Nigeria
today is no more than a political gambit primarily designed to shore up lagging
support for the APC in the South-west in view of the looming 2019 elections.
The 1993 election is widely
regarded as the only free and fair election that has ever taken place in Nigeria .
Since that is the case, consider the following truths that the election results
revealed. In 1993, more people voted in the South than they did in the
North. We are told time and time again that the political advantage of
the North is that it is more populous than the South, and that this gives the
North a certain advantage during elections. Given the fact that in nearly
60 years, we have yet to conduct a credible census in Nigeria , there
has been no way of verifying the validity of this assumption that flies in the
face of logic and geography. However, the free and fair presidential election
of 1993 provides us with a solid answer. In that election, (and I repeat
for emphasis, the only free and fair election ever conducted in Nigeria), with
only two candidates on the ballot, one from the North and the other from the
South, only 5,962,085 people voted in the North relative to 8,243,209 who voted
in the South. In effect, that highly-contested election revealed what most of
us always knew: there are more people in the South than in the North. In
1993, the North only provided roughly 40% of the electorate in Nigeria , while
the South provided roughly 60%. IBB and his cohorts who decided to annul
the election did not want Nigerians to know this.
Since it is now recognized
officially by the present Nigerian government no less that the 1993
presidential election was free and fair, then it stands to reason to maintain
by the same token that the 2015 presidential election was a sham.
Observe the following for
example. We are meant to believe today that the most populous state in
the federation is Kano ; thereby Kano
delivers the largest number of votes in elections in Nigeria . Against all reason
and logic, it is said that Kano even has a
larger population than Lagos , even though in
1991, Jigawa State
was carved out of Kano .
This is simply incredible! However, in the 1993 presidential election, the only
free and fair election in the history of Nigeria now validated by the Buhari
administration, and with a favourite son of Kano on the ballot in the person of
Bashir Tofa; Kano could only deliver 442,176 votes, less than half that of
Lagos’ 1,033,397 votes.
Therefore, the 1993
presidential election results show conclusively that the large votes generally
attributed to Northern states and especially Kano in Nigerian elections are
fictitious. In 2015, the presidential election between Goodluck Jonathan
and Muhammadu Buhari was level-pegging until the bombshell of Kano ’s result was announced. While we
were told 1,678,754 people voted in Lagos , an
incredible 2,364,434 people were said to have voted in Kano . On the basis of the 1993
template, this just cannot be true. But it did not stop there.
Another 1,153,428 votes came
from Jigawa, which was carved out of old Kano .
In effect, these two states of old Kano had
3,517,862 votes, nearly 2 million votes more than that of Lagos in 2015. And yet, Lagos is clearly the most
populous state in the federation; a fact attested to by the 1993 presidential
election results. With Buhari said to have received 1,903,999 votes from Kano , more than the entire votes cast by everybody in Lagos , and another
885,988 votes from Jigawa; making a total of 2,789,987, his lead in the 2015
presidential election suddenly became unassailable. Elder Godsday Orubebe was
so outraged by this disclosure, he disrupted the proceedings at the national
collation centre, seized the microphone and accused the INEC chairman, Attahitu
Jega, of partiality to the APC. Although he was subsequently constrained
to apologise for this infraction, his outburst is understandable in light of
the outrageously padded votes awarded to the APC.
The problem here is that this
fiction of outrageous votes by the states of the North-west in particular has
now been locked in into the DNA of Nigerian elections. Elections can now
be won fictitiously in Nigeria
by reliance on the outrageous votes of the North-west based on the 2015
template. Jega’s gift to the North was that he laid the foundation
whereby all future elections in Nigeria
will henceforth be decided by inflated Northern votes; unless something drastic
is done about it. When government stalwarts keep insisting today that the APC
cannot lose the election in 2019,
in spite of the dismal performance of the government
over the last three years, you can now see what they are so confident.
Thanks to Jega, the dice has been loaded since 2015 in APC’s favour.
So, when Babangida and his
Northern subalterns saw the 1993 presidential election result, they refused to
declare it. To declare it is to completely demystify the North and expose
the Northern population supremacy in Nigeria as fiction. In 1993, the
election result showed Kano provided less than
half the votes of Lagos , with a Kano candidate on the ballot. How then
could Kano have so overtaken Lagos
in population as to provide more votes for the APC by a wide margin in 2015
than the votes cast in Lagos ?
In 1993, the four largest states by vote in Nigeria were all from the
South. So where did all the Northern voting juggernauts of later years,
including 2015, come from? In 1993, Kano
did not even provide the largest cache of votes from the North, given the fact
that Jigawa was carved out of it. Northern states like Plateau, Kebbi and
Niger provided more votes
than Kano .
Southern states like Rivers, Ogun, Anambra and Oyo also provided more votes
than Kano in
1993. Out of the then 30 states of 1993, Kano provided only the 14th largest number of
votes. So what accounts for the subsequent transformation of Kano as the great
provider of votes for Northern candidates in Nigerian elections?
So, if the government is
genuine about accepting the verdict of the 1993 presidential election result,
let the government also accept the official figures of that election. Let
it reveal the results officially for the world to see. Otherwise, how
could it have reached the conclusion that Abiola won the election without the
election results? The 1993 presidential election was by all accounts the best
free and fair election ever in the history of Nigeria . Except for the
South-west, which voted overwhelmingly for Abiola, the election was keenly contested
everywhere.
In the North, Abiola
obtained 3,108,218 votes, while Tofa received 3,369,848 votes. In the
East, Abiola obtained 739,748 votes; while Tofa received 790,371. In the
South-South, Abiola received 1,299,352 votes; while Tofa received 1,252,340.
This shows Abiola was not a regional candidate. He obtained a national
mandate. Significantly, he obtained more votes in Kano
(169,619) than did Tofa (154,809); despite the fact that Kano is Tofa’s home state. But the June
12 saga has now been politicised. Politicisation means it is now
presented as if the annulment was essentially an affront to the
South-west.
In actual fact, the annulment
was an affront to all Nigerians by a Northern cabal who persist in the
insistence that the will of the people of Nigeria should not be done at the
polls. The declaration of June 12 as a national public holiday and
glorification of Abiola is a political gift to the South-west in this election
season; otherwise the full results would also have been officially
certified. Failure to certify the 1993 result guarantees that the 2019
presidential election will also be a sham.
*Dr. Aribasala is a commentator on public issues
No comments:
Post a Comment