My “June
12: I Still Remember” article last week elicited, expectedly, diverse responses.
The annulment of the election and the consequent turmoil remain very emotive
issues. What
the responses prove most conclusively is that President Muhammadu Buhari
remains a very polarising leader. And he profiteers from that. Sadly. I will
come to that shortly.
*MKO Abiola |
A quarter of a century
after the annulment of that historic poll and 20 years after the death of the
winner, Bashorun MKO Abiola, President Buhari sprang a political surprise on
many penultimate week by declaring subsequent June 12 anniversaries Democracy
Day and honouring Abiola with the highest national award – Grand
Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR).
My article, though an
endorsement of the president’s action, was issue-specific as captured in the
last paragraph which read:
“Some have queried the president’s motive. My answer is simple. Whatever informed the decision, it was the right thing to do. And if in doing what is right, he is reaping some political capital, so be it.”
“Some have queried the president’s motive. My answer is simple. Whatever informed the decision, it was the right thing to do. And if in doing what is right, he is reaping some political capital, so be it.”
In affirming this
decision of the president, I was neither unmindful of the view held by many
that it was a political gimmick for 2019 elections nor Professor Ben Nwabueze’s
informed opinion that the president’s action was ab-initio a nullity because of its
illegality.
Nevertheless, I insist
that for the country to move forward, there must be a closure to sundry
historical injustices. Annulment of June 12 election is one.
And that cannot happen
without addressing the Abiola factor. In victory, he embodied the democracy
ethos of that era and by insisting, even on to death, on exercising that
mandate, Abiola became the issue.
But my affirmation of
that presidential pronouncement was neither a validation of Buhari’s dismal
scorecard, his government’s egregious policies, nor his scandalous
provincialism.
No!
I strongly believe that any
incumbent who wishes to run for a second term must do so on the strength of his
records during the first term. Second term is not and shouldn’t be an automatic
reward for a first time no-matter how woeful an outing it was.
And I strongly believe
that President Buhari’s performance in the last three years does not commend
him for a second term. That was the thrust of my May 29, 2018 article on the
third anniversary of his presidency.
“Three years down the road, the statistics churned out by government officials
as proof of stellar performance are important. But more important is the
evidence of ordinary citizens whose collective values, the government
authoritatively allocates. The most practical measure of the success of the
government is the number of Nigerians whose lots are better today than three
years ago. On the average, life seems to be nastier, more brutish
and shorter in Buhari’s Nigeria ,” was my
conclusion.
Nothing has happened in the last three weeks
to warrant a different assessment.
Now, back to Buhari’s
uncanny ability to bring out the worst in us even with the “best of
intentions.” I don’t know how many Nigerians who, in principle, are against the
idea of permanently exorcising the June 12 ghost in the spirit of national
reconciliation.
But as has been evinced
in sundry reactions, even this otherwise worthy gesture has polarised Nigerians
along the same fault lines the June 12, 1993 poll symbolically consigned to the
garbage bin of Nigeria ’s
history.
Many who had called me names in the past, accusing me of being anti-Buhari
suddenly called to praise my “patriotism and forthrightness.” With people like
me, they echoed, Nigeria ’s
future remains bright. I transmuted overnight from a “wailing wailer” who will
be consumed by “hate” to a “hailing hailer,” on whose shoulders the much
elusive Nigeria ’s
rosy future rests.
Conversely, those who
hitherto hailed me as a “diehard Buhari critic” became “alarmed.” In fact, one
was so outraged that he enquired how much I was paid to “betray the cause.”
Ironically, the way and
manner the investiture was carried out on June 12 only strengthened the
argument of those who perceived the awards from the prism of offish political
agenda. Wittingly or unwittingly, the investiture became a cynical celebration
of the extant Northwest/Southwest political coquetry. What is more, Yoruba
triumphalism was on full parade.
Granted, Abiola was
Yoruba but any attempt to limit his essence using the country’s primordial
fault-lines of ethnicity and religion detracts fundamentally from his
transcendentalism.
As Dr. Femi Aribisala
noted in his “What June 12 Reveals About Nigerian Democracy,” article
published in The
Vanguard newspaper last week, the annulment affronts all Nigerians.
Aribisala correctly noted
that the spread of Abiola’s votes and the fact that he defeated Alhaji Bashir
Tofa in his home state of Kano
by scoring 169,619 as against Tofa’s 154,809 was a veritable proof that he was
not a regional candidate. His was a national mandate.
Unfortunately, as
Aribisala further noted, “The June 12 saga has now been politicised,” and
“politicisation means it is now presented as if the annulment was essentially
an affront to the South-west,” when “in actual fact, the annulment was an
affront to all Nigerians ….”
So, while I insist that
President Buhari should be allowed to enjoy his day in the sun, in celebrating
his political masterstroke, Nigerians should avoid the mistakes of the 1990s
that almost reduced an otherwise national struggle to ethnic affair.
I have heard some people ululate over what is now being promoted as the
“political sophistication” of the Southwest. I don’t have any issues with that appellation.
If the Southwest claims to be the most politically sophisticated region in Nigeria , it is
welcome and entitled to the sticky tag.
But even that label does
not detract from the truths of the June 12 saga which are: For every Arthur
Nzeribe of the Association for Better Nigeria (ABN) infamy, there was an
Abimbola Davies. For every Uche Chukwumerije, there was an Ebenezer Babatope.
For every General Sani Abacha, there was a General Oladipo Diya.
And for every General
Alani Akinrinade, there were an Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu and Air
Commodore Dan Suleiman who teamed up with other pro–democracy activists to
fight the military government, co-founded the National Democratic Coalition
(NADECO), fled into exile and only returned after Abacha’s death in 1998.
For every Beko
Ransome-Kuti and Femi Falana, there were an Olisa Agbakoba, Chima Ubani, Shehu
Sani and Chidi Odinkalu.
For every Kunle Ajibade
who was imprisoned on trumped up charges, there were a Chris Anyanwu, who
nearly went blind in prison, Ben Charles Obi, who didn’t quite survive his
prison experience, and a James Bagauda Kaltho who died.
And for every Bola Ahmed
Tinubu and the other Southwest political chieftains who were in the trenches
fighting for the validation of the June 12 mandate, there were a Balarabe Musa
and a Ralph Obioha, whose African Trust Bank, Safari Brewery, vegetable oil
company, cement company were destroyed by the military. Unlike some of his
colleagues from the Southwest and the North who have not only been
rehabilitated but also handsomely rewarded, Obioha is yet to recover.
And need I say that the
man who superintended over the freest and fairest poll that has become a
reference point in the history of Nigeria’s electoral politics is Professor
Humphrey Nwosu, an Igbo, while the man General Ibrahim Babangida handed over
power while retreating from Aso Rock to his hilltop mansion in Minna is Chief
Ernest Shonekan, an Egba from Ogun State like Abiola.
So, we debase the June 12
essence and dishonour Abiola if the idea is the celebration of ethnic
triumphalism and promotion of a cynical and self-serving political dalliance
rather than an attempt at wholesome national renaissance.
*Ikechukwu
Amaechi is the Editor-in-Chief/CEO of the TheNiche, a
national newspaper published in Lagos
No comments:
Post a Comment