The 40 million Igbo
people resident in Nigeria
and elsewhere, represented by Ohaneze
Ndigbo and the South East Governors Forum, will on Monday, May 21, command
global attention as they take a stand on how Nigeria can achieve a more perfect
union and consequently regain its manifest destiny. It promises a galaxy of
Igbo stars in politics and leadership. The promise of the gathering has been
accentuated by the fact that it is hosted by Governor Willie Obiano of Anambra
State whom former Senate President Ken Nnamani rightly describes as the Star of
the East. No one doubts that Nigeria ,
as currently configured, needs a better design.
The ruling All
Progressives Congress (APC) set up a powerful committee headed by Kaduna State
Governor Nasir el-Rufai to fashion out a more realistic and effective
Constitution. President Muhammadu Buhari has stated categorically that he is
not opposed to rearranging the country’s administrative structure. Ex-Vice
President Atiku Abubakar has become one of the greatest proponents, after
initially opposing it because of his mistaken ideas about it. In other words,
the call for Nigeria ’s
rebirth is popular and patriotic. All of us desire—and are deserving of— a
better Nigeria .
In the moving and wise language of the late Vice President Alex Ekwueme, Nigeria is a
miracle waiting to happen.
The reason for the global interest in the Igbo
position on what is popularly known as restructuring is not difficult to
discern. Of all the component groups which make up Nigeria’s federation, the
Igbo people have in the last few decades developed the most robust and
realistic vision to make Nigeria a stable, peaceful, just and productive
political entity. Take the six geopolitical zones. Though the geopolitical
zones may not be in the 1999 Constitution or any legal instrument, *Nwodo, Ohaneze President-General |
It was there that they decided that Nigeria ’s 30
states were unwieldy and, indeed, cost centres. Rather than become centres and
drivers of development, as they were envisaged to be when they were created at
different times, the states were too dependent on the centre. This was
recognized as a gross violation of the basic principles of federalism which
make the centre and federating units independent and co-equal.
As more states were created, the more powerful the Federal Government became.
Two reasons were identified for this state of affairs. The first was the long
history of military rule. Under military regime, state governors were appointed
by the federal military government. Instead of enjoying a measure of
independence, the state military governors were like viceroys. It is really a
contradiction in terms to expect a reasonable degree of federalism to obtain
under a military government. In every true federation, there must be from time
to time disagreements between the central government and the states or regions
or provinces, as they may be called. These disagreements are often resolved by
the law courts. But any military state governor who dared disagree with the
Federal Government, let alone take it to court in the name of federalism, would
be charged with treasonable felony. So, it is extremely difficult to practise
federalism under any military government anywhere. The second reason for the
massive erosion of federalism is the large number of states. The military
created the states, though based on demands by political elite. The principal
reason for acquiescing to the requests was informed by the Biafran experience.
The then military authorities believed that Biafra ,
as the former Eastern Region became, would not have lasted 30 months if it had
been a smaller territory. Therefore, to make the Nigerian federating units less
powerful so that they would not be in a position to challenge the central
authorities, the states were constantly fragmented. Yet, the official reason
cited for constant creation of states was to accelerate development and bring
the government nearer to the people.
At the Mkpoko Igbo Conference in Enugu , it was agreed that the golden period in Nigeria ’s development history was in the First Republic
of 1960-6 when Nigeria
had only three, and later four, regions. During this period, the Eastern
Region, for instance, became the world’s fastest growing economy. But with
Eastern Region turning into several states, much of the revenue is spent on
recurrent matters; little money is left for capital expenses, as in all other
parts of the country. Ironically, it is capital expenditure which drives every
economy in the world. To enable Nigeria
to recreate the golden era, the conference resolved that Nigeria should
not have more than six federating units. This was how the country’s current six
geopolitical zones came about. Dr Ekwueme, who participated actively in the
Mkpoko Igbo Conference and was the undisputed lightning rod on account of his
acute brilliance, was mandated to lead the Igbo delegation at the 1994-5
Constitutional Conference in Abuja .
Ekwueme successfully marketed this great innovation which changed Nigeria ’s
history for the better. To state the obvious, the six-zonal arrangement was not
the only issue on which the Igbo took a position informed by a deep concern for
Nigeria ’s
future. At the Mkpoko Igbo Conference in Enugu ,
the people called for the presidency to rotate from one geopolitical zone to
another. This position was adopted by the 1994-5 Constitutional Conference in Abuja , even though it was
resolved that the presidency would rotate between the South and the North. The
Igbo also called for only one term of five or six years for the president and
even for state governors. This argument prevailed at the Constitutional
Conference.
In addition, the Igbo campaigned for a
substantial increase in the derivation principle in national resource sharing
from a mere three per cent to 13 per cent. They succeeded at the Constitutional
Conference. The reason for the campaign for the increase was, apart from fairness
and justice, the growing restiveness in the Niger Delta over the neglect and
underdevelopment of the region; the restiveness was then at the incipient
stage.
The only major issue on which the Igbo
took a stand at both the Mkpoko Igbo Conference and the 1994/5 Constitutional
Conference but not accepted at the latter conference was the need for six vice
presidents from the six geopolitical zones, including the zone from where the
president came. In the event of the president resigning or dying or impeached,
the vice president from his or her zone would complete what remained of the
term. Otherwise, the president’s zone would feel cheated. It took President
Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s death and the consequent political upheaval for the
nation to observe the foresight and wisdom for the argument for each
geopolitical zone to produce a vice president at any point in time. As things
stand today in Nigeria ,
a serving president cannot fail a re-election, however poorly he or she may
have governed, without his or her zone feeling outrageously cheated.
The nation has to address this issue sooner
than later. The major constitutional issues facing Nigeria have long been identified
by the Igbo who also have provided original and imaginative solutions to them.
The Igbo summit holding in Awka on Monday to examine Nigeria ’s future has to revisit
these issues, most of which were incorporated in the 1995 Constitution. It is a
pity that the Afenifere compelled General Abubakar Abdulsalami to jettison this
innovative constitution and bring back the 1979 Constitution simply because it
was produced under General Abacha whom they resented. It was a case of throwing
away both the bath water and the baby. Though the 1995 Constitution was
produced under the Abacha regime, the military ruler made no contribution to
its contents.
It is self-evident that the 1994/5
Constitutional Conference gave the Igbo an opportunity to demonstrate, once
again, their world-famous ingenuity. The Igbo Summit in Awka provides yet
another opportunity to display great foresight in proffering solutions to Nigeria ’s
myriad problems which have prevented the nation over the decades from taking
its rightful place in the comity of nations. All Nigerians and indeed, the
world are awaiting the outcome of the summit.
Nsofor, member of the Nigerian Society of
Engineers, is a former majority leader in the Anambra State House of Assembly.
No comments:
Post a Comment