It was Thomas Hobbes, the 17th century English philosopher, who
in his seminal work Leviathan put a magnifying lens on “the natural
condition of mankind.” All humans are by nature equal in faculties of body
and mind, he argued, and therefore, “During the time men live without a common
power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre … of every man against every
man,” a natural condition he elucidated with the Latin phrase bellum omnium contra omnes (war of
all against all).
“The life of man” in the state of nature, Hobbes famously wrote,
is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
In the state of nature,
security was impossible for anyone, and the fear of death dominated every
aspect of life. Being rational, man sought to reverse this nihilistic status
quo. Therefore, since in the
state of nature “all men have a natural right to all things,” to assure peace,
men must give up their right to some things, and Hobbes asserted that an
individual’s transfer of some of his rights to another is offset by certain
gains for himself. At the societal level,
the mutual transfer of individual rights to a body called government becomes a
social contract and Hobbes argued this contract is the basis for all collective
moral order. Yet, it does not detract
from the natural right to self-preservation, which, in any case, is the basis
for any contract. When a government, by omission or commission, defaults in
safeguarding lives, man’s survival instinct manifests. Hobbes, who lived between
1588 and 1679, made these observations eons ago when there was no country
called Nigeria. However, the 21st century
Nigeria
epitomises Hobbes’ state of nature because of the government’s miserable
failure to live up to its contractual obligation of ensuring the safety of
lives and property of the people. Apologists of the
administration of President Muhammadu Buhari will, typically, dismiss this
position at best as hyperbolic, an exaggeration; or worse, the ranting of the
nay-Sayers. But those holding the wrong end of government’s abdication stick
know what it means to live in a state of nature. The unlucky ones are
buried in mass graves, mere numbers without identity. Many of those who count
themselves lucky simply because they are still alive are in internally
displaced people’s (IDP) camps in their own country. They can neither go back
to their homes nor access their farmlands. They live in perpetual fear. The Benue
villages attacked on New Year’s day remain inaccessible to both the police and
the residents who fled. For those who live in the
frontlines of this asymmetric war waged by Fulani herdsmen, life in Nigeria
is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” As Nigerians, we must be
worried, more so when the government’s false narrative is added as an extra
ingredient in the already deadly brew. It is frightening that
the government is not only doing nothing to stop the bloodbath but also
deliberately pushing out a narrative that is patently false with the sole
purpose of wheedling the unwary. The brazen attempt by
government officials to make villains out of victims while beatifying
scoundrels who have made life hellish for fellow citizens is beyond
comprehension. For instance, why would
Buhari admonish Benue
leaders in the wake of the bloodbath in the state orchestrated by Fulani
herdsmen to restrain their people (the victims) by accommodating fellow
countrymen (the villains) “in the name of God?” The implication is that
he believes the herdsmen are the victims in this atrocious war. Taking a cue, the
Minister of Defence, Brig-General Mansur Dan-Ali (rtd), on Thursday, January
25, blamed the passage of anti-open grazing law in some states for the killings
by Fulani herdsmen. Briefing journalists at
the end of a meeting of security chiefs chaired by Buhari, the minister urged
Nigerians to learn to accept foreigners. “Whatever crisis that
happened at any time, there has to be remote and immediate causes,” he said. “What are the remote
causes of this farmers/herders crisis? Since independence, we know there used
to be a route whereby these cattle rearers use. Cattle rearers are all
over the nation, you go to Bayelsa, you see them, you go to Ogun, and you see
them. If those routes are blocked, what happens? These people are Nigerians,
it’s just like you going to block a river or shoreline, does that make sense to
you? These are the remote
causes. But what are the immediate causes? It is the grazing law. These people
are Nigerians, we must learn to live together with each other; that is basic. Communities and other
people must learn how to accept foreigners within their enclave, finish!” Saying this right after a
security meeting presided over by the president, that couldn’t have been his
personal opinion. It was the opinion of the security apparatchik and their
commander-in-chief. Is it then any surprise
that none of these murderers has been arrested? Rather than disarm the herdsmen
who are openly brandishing lethal weapons, Dan-Ali would want vigilante groups
and forest guards disarmed. Is he saying that in the
21st century, in a country supposedly governed by law, rather than going to
court to enforce abridged rights, Fulani herdsmen have the right to murder
anyone who stands in their way? Then, the Inspector
General of Police, Ibrahim Idris – who last month described the Benue killings
as “a communal clash” – on Friday, February 2, told senators that the anti-open
grazing law enacted by Ekiti, Benue and Taraba states is the reason for the
killings. To him, therefore, the
only solution to the crisis is the suspension of the law. But the government is
being economical with the truth. For instance, the Open Grazing Prohibition and
Ranches Establishment Law of Benue State in particular was an attempt by Benue
people who felt abandoned by Abuja
at finding a solution to the herdsmen rampage. The carnage preceded the
law, which only came into effect in November 2017. Since 2013, more than 50
attacks linked to herdsmen have been reported in states as far flung as Benue,
Nasarawa, Taraba, Adamawa, Enugu, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Ondo, Zamfara, Kaduna, Edo,
Plateau, among others. In February 2016, more
than 500 residents were killed in Agatu, BenueState.
Government officials claim that more than 100,000 villagers are currently
living in several IDP camps across the state. In any case, if the
bloodbath is punishment for the anti-open grazing law, what is the
justification for the killings in states that don’t have the law? Yet, the Presidency
blames the media for its self-induced perception miasma. On Friday, February 2,
the same day Idris amplified Buhari’s mindset at the Senate, Presidential Media
Aide, Garba Shehu, accused journalists of “sinking deeper and deeper into the
mesh of hate speech.” As a Nigerian, it is
extremely difficult to rationalise the government’s position on this nationwide
carnage. As Hobbes rightly
observed, the fact that a people went into a social contract, renouncing the
right to kill another in exchange for not being killed, in no way negates their
natural right to self-preservation, which in any case is the first law of nature. It is even more so where
the government wilfully repudiates its own obligation as it is evident now. When Shehu says Buhari
has the primary duty of protecting life and property of all Nigerians, he is
stating the obvious. But when he adds “and
that is what he has been doing in Benue
and across the country,” many Nigerians disagree. The blood of the innocent
flowing like a river across the country bears witness that Buhari is not up to
scratch in discharging that responsibility. I don’t know about Buhari
being complicit in the killings as Shehu claims some people are insinuating. But I do know it is
unbecoming of a president to tell those who ran to him for help to tolerate and
accommodate their tormentors who kill their men, rape their women, sack them
from their homes, render them homeless and destitute. These are distraught
citizens, confronted with genocide. That Buhari invoked the
name of God in this rebuke beggars belief. It is unfortunate that
these statements are credited to the President and Commander-in-Chief of the
Nigerian Armed Forces, the Minister of Defence and Inspector General of Police.
These utterances betray them as people whose sympathy lie with a particular
group in this brutal conflict. The Nigerian state has
abdicated its sacred mandate. Little wonder Benue State Governor, Samuel Ortom,
is telling the long-suffering people of Benue to defend themselves. In Benue, nay Nigeria, anarchy looms!
*Mr. Amaechi is the Managing Director/Editor-in-Chief of TheNiche newspaper, Nigeria (ikechukwuamaechi@gmail.com).
No comments:
Post a Comment