By Paul Onomuakpokpo
In a seeming bid to
douse his increasing credibility crisis, President Muhammadu Buhari has now
belatedly realised the need to absolve himself of killings by herdsmen. No
longer does he find comfort in his practised silence in the face of the
citizens’ outrage at the atrocities being committed by herdsmen.
But Buhari’s newfangled disposition has failed
to prove the fast-expanding camp of the naysayers wrong. Rather, what has
become clear is that Buhari has bungled another opportunity to shore up his
credibility. Thus, Buhari’s defence of himself ended up being a reinforcement
of his history of incapability to meet the demands of his high office.
Clearly, Buhari has had many opportunities to convince Nigerians that herdsmen do not enjoy his sympathy as long as they stray from the path of doing their business within the confines of the law. But the citizens have often waited in vain for such a disavowal that should be an appropriate response to a bout of herdsmen’s lunacy.
*Pres Buhari and Gov El-Rufai |
Clearly, Buhari has had many opportunities to convince Nigerians that herdsmen do not enjoy his sympathy as long as they stray from the path of doing their business within the confines of the law. But the citizens have often waited in vain for such a disavowal that should be an appropriate response to a bout of herdsmen’s lunacy.
The citizens have been witnesses to Buhari’s silence as herdsmen destroy the
livelihoods of farmers with their cows, rape, maim and kill in different parts
of the country, especially the south-south, south-east, south-west, southern Kaduna and the middle
belt.
Consequently, the citizens are left with the
impression that herdsmen perpetrate their carnage with support at the highest
level of government. So, what has come as Buhari’s defence of himself against
the allegation of complicity in the infliction of blood and tears on the
citizens by herdsmen does not by any means redeem his credibility.
What was suspected to be the official
protection of killer herdsmen was sufficiently evidenced by the response of
Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai to them. El-Rufai is not the president.
Nor is he a top Federal Government official charged with the responsibility of
bringing sanity to murderous herdsmen. However, we could use El-Rufai’s
response to understand Buhari’s position because the governor is a close ally
of the president.
So, how El-Rufai responded would have been the
same way the president would have reacted if he were in the same circumstances.
When herdsmen unleashed havoc on southern Kaduna ,
they were neither arrested nor punished by El-Rufai. Rather, he admitted
knowing the culprits and that he chose to pay them money as a means of
placating them and stopping them from further attacks on their victims.
However, this has not stopped herdsmen from
attacking and killing the people of southern Kaduna . Nigerians were shocked at the action
of El-Rufai. But Buhari neither condemned the position of El-Rufai nor ordered
his security operatives to arrest and prosecute the murderous herdsmen.
This is one of the reasons Buhari is far from
convincing when he says that he is not responsible for the making of
blood-thirsty herdsmen. Even now with the increasing macabre dimension of
herdsmen’s criminality, there is no assurance that they would be punished. It
is the realisation that under the government of Buhari they are above the law
that herdsmen even have the audacity to be killing policemen. Yes, Buhari has
deployed more security personnel to Benue
State . But would this
solve the problem? If the body language of Buhari is that these herdsmen should
not be arrested and prosecuted, the security operatives would only operate in
line with the expectations of the president.
Thus, while it is good that Buhari has
deployed more security operatives to Benue , he
must demonstrate his seriousness to rein in killer herdsmen by arresting and
prosecuting them. There is no way these killers can escape arrest and
prosecution if Buhari is serious with dealing with the danger they pose to the
nation’s security. The leaders of Miyetti Allah are known to the government and
its security operatives. Even Governor Samuel Ortom has suggested that those
responsible for the killings are somewhere in Nasarawa State .
The leaders of this group who threatened to make the law on the Prohibition of
Open Grazing and Establishment of Ranches unworkable should be held responsible
for turning Benue
State into a killing
field.
Buhari has not demonstrated a sense of urgency that the herdsmen
crisis demands. The same Buhari who was quick at deploying soldiers and
armoured personnel carriers to mow down mere flag-wielding members of the
Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has failed to take a decisive action against
killer herdsmen. It was the same Buhari who deployed troops to liquidate Niger
Delta youths for obstructing the production of crude oil through their
agitations.
Indeed, the options are very clear to deal
with the herdsmen. It is the insincerity of the Buhari government that has made
the resolution of the herdsmen’s crisis seem elusive.
Now, the government is worsening this seeming
elusiveness by a resort to sophistry. Or why is the government talking about
holding conferences and cattle colonies when it is clear that the model that
has worked in many other parts of the world that even have more cattle than Nigeria is
simply ranching? Why does the Buhari government avoid this option if it
actually wants to resolve the crisis in a way that the herdsmen would not gain
some privileges to the detriment of other citizens, especially farmers? The
insincerity of the Buhari government is further shown in its explanation that
there have been clashes between farmers and herdsmen because the population of Nigeria has
grown more than what it was in the past.
Does Nigeria
have more population than the United
States that is one of the biggest
cow-producing countries of the world? If it is a large population that is
responsible for the clashes, why are these countries not torn apart by similar
herdsmen’s crises? As Ortom reminded Buhari, even in African countries such as Swaziland , South
Africa , Kenya ,
Tanzania and Mozambique ,
ranching is the model of cattle rearing.
Buhari must know that the life of every
Nigerian is as precious as his life and the lives of his dear ones like his
children. He should be worried that Nigerians are being killed over matters
that he could easily resolve. He should not wait until lives are lost before
deploying troops and considering other measures that he should have taken
earlier. In the same vein, the livelihoods of other citizens are as important
as those of the herdsmen. He should not through his inaction or complicity encourage
the herdsmen to continue with their business of cattle-rearing while destroying
other citizens’ farms.
Besides, we must be alert to the ominous
prospect that as long as the government continues to treat murderous herdsmen
with levity, Benue may not be their most
heart-rending killing field. They would extend their blood lust to more places.
But Buhari and the herdsmen must discharge themselves of the illusion that the
citizens would always allow themselves to be killed at will by the herdsmen.
After all, since the herdsmen cannot be tamed
by law as being demonstrated in Benue , there
is an increasing consciousness of the need for the next victims of attacks to
prepare to defend themselves. And this may not consume only those involved in
such a battle but the entire nation.
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on the Editorial Board of The Guardian
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on the Editorial Board of The Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment