By Paul Onomuakpokpo
If the German-speaking
Jewish writer Franz Kafka were in Nigeria now, he would observe that
it is not only in the imaginative space that there are boundless possibilities
in the depiction of the human condition. A validation of his art would have
been that his brand of surrealism that is a staple of the imaginative
provenance has assumed actuality in the human realm. In that case, Kafka would
have been spared being sniggered at on account of Samsa Gregor, a human being,
mutating into a vermin in his The Metamorphosis.
*Buhari |
This kind of
validation was the lot of Chinua Achebe when his prediction in A Man
of the People of the epochal termination of the nation’s first
democratic experience was fulfilled by the military who sacked the wayward
politicians of the 1960s and triggered a series of cataclysmic events that
provoked the civil war. But Kafka and Achebe would have been at the same time
amused and shocked that the boundless and surrealistic possibilities in their
fictional worlds could be located in the realm of actuality in Nigeria – even
beyond their imagination.
Such a literary marvel
that would have seemed only possible in the imaginative worlds of Kafka, Achebe
and other writers is a situation where the dead lead the living. This would
remain as one of the major innovations of
But what must not
elude us is that the credit that duly goes to President Muhammadu Buhari is
that it is under his government that the possibility of the dead leading the
living is brazenly demonstrated. In fact, this possibility is flaunted at the
citizens. And if the latter attempt to ask any questions, government officials
feel affronted. This brazen character of the possibility of the dead leading
the living being projected by the Buhari government has vitalised the
imagination of Nigerians. They have thus alerted us to the fact that the system
of government being practised by Buhari, his officials and political party
could be referred to as either deadocracy
or corpsocracy.
Or how do you explain
the Buhari government giving appointments to the dead as chairmen or members of
the boards of government parastatals and agencies? The list of the dead is
getting longer with the passage of each day. But so far, the list contains the
names of nine dead persons. They include: Francis Okpozo, Chairman of the
Nigerian Press Council; Donald Ugbaja, a board member of the Consumer
Protection Council; Christopher Utov, a board member of the Nigerian Institute
of Social and Economic Research; and Garba Attahiru, Umar Dange, Nabbs Imegwu
and Azuzu Okpalaibekwe who were given other positions and boards.
Since deadocracy or corpsocarcy is a government of the dead for the dead, it is no
accident that that there has been a spectre of death over the nation since the
emergence of Buhari as the president. Obviously, what Buhari failed to add to
his 2011 apocalyptic prediction was that it was not only when he lost but also
when he won that the baboons and dogs would be soaked in blood. The agents for
the fulfillment of this prophecy are multiple. They come in the form of wrongheaded
policies that neglect the socio-economic wellbeing of the citizens leading to
their untimely death. They are in the form of the neglect of the nation’s
health care system that dooms the citizens to their early death. But more
importantly, they come in the form of herdsmen on the prowl, looking for whom
to devour. Thus, it is not strange that since Buhari became president Fulani
herdsmen who were living harmoniously in their host communities in different
parts of the country have declared themselves implacable foes of their hosts.
The death from the herdsmen comes almost on a daily basis. If they are not
raping, maiming and killing in the southern part of the country, they are
inflicting similar havoc in southern Kaduna
. Or they are unleashing horror in the Middle Belt. Just this week, over 50
persons were slaughtered by the herdsmen in Benue
communities.
Thus, it is the
government officials who are outraged that the citizens took umbrage at Buhari
making the dead to lead them that are chafing under the affliction of a
Lilliputian mind and not the people. For, all we see from this development is
that the Buhari government is tardy; it cannot pay attention to details. The
government officials who see themselves as intellectuals and the citizens as Lilliputians
have only mocked their so-called intellectualism by not being able to vet and
re-vet just a list containing names of the appointees. What the arrogance of
the so-called intellectuals of the Buhari government prevents them from seeing
but which is clear to the citizens is that the list betrays why the citizens
should not expect good governance from this government. For, if they cannot
give the citizens a list that would not provoke such deserved outrage, how
would they muster the attention span and patience to consider policies that
would improve the citizens’ wellbeing?
Obviously, it is the
same way that they approved the list and released it to the public that the
officials of the government sign documents for raiding the treasury without
paying sufficient attention to what they are endorsing. If the list had been
prepared since over two years ago, should this not have naturally necessitated
screening it again? So, the Buhari government did not even consider the
possibility of some names being sneaked onto the list? How was the Buhari
government so sure that the reasons for putting some of those names on the list
were still valid after two years? How were they so sure that those who were to
be appointed because of their loyalty to the nation, Buhari or the All
Progressives Congress (APC) had not become treacherous?
The excuse that Buhari
could not have knocked at the door of every appointee to know if he or she was
alive rather betrays intellectual vacuity of those who accuse the citizens of
being Lilliputians. Worse still, why must the Buhari government keep the list
for over two years when the appointments were meant to improve governance? Does
this not show absentmindedness, negligence and insensitivity of the Buhari
administration? A better excuse by the Buhari government could have been that
because it could not find capable people among the living where the dead came
from, it had to opt for the latter. It could go further by arguing that because
they were dead and there were no other qualified persons, that was why some of
them were offered marginal positions even though they came from a region of the
country that supplies its resources.
Again, if Buhari and
his officials cannot re-vet such a list why should the citizens expect them to
muster the energy and patience to scrutinise budgets? Any wonder that figures
are planted in budgets for officials to steal money and they are only ferreted
out at the moment of screening at the National Assembly? And this could also
explain why the Buhari government has turned the 2014 national conference
report into an object of derision. Its consignment to the archives of the
Buhari government may not be because of its position that the report’s
recommendations are not capable of achieving what they promise – a better
governance system that could give the citizens a better life. It is rather
probably because Buhari and his officials consider wading through a document of
hundreds of pages a repulsive ordeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment