By Yakubu Mohammed
By which ever means
the panjandrums of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, were able to patch it up,
their national convention, the first since its ouster from power in 2015,
has come and gone leaving in its trail the usual post- convention trauma that
features some teeth gnashing, some wailings, some threats, real and
imaginary and lots of conjectures about what would be and what would not
be thereafter.
But nobody, not even the ruling All
Progressives Congress, APC, can dismiss what the opposition party, the PDP,
successfully put up as a non-event. What is left now is to see how the PDP
executives under the chairmanship of Uche Secondus, manage themselves from now
through to the 2019 presidential election.With a heavy baggage, naturally there is a lot
of pressure on the PDP to remake itself and launder its not-so-admirable image
to regain the support and the sympathy of the people before it ventures into
the series elections from next year. PDP is counting on disaffected and
disappointed people to move in droves from the ruling party not only
to strengthen its support base but working with a major catch like Atiku
Abubakar, to refurbish and recoup the political gravitas that it was known for
in the 16 years that it ruled the country. It remains to be seen how
successful it will be in this new enterprise.
But for the growth of democracy, the rebirth of the PDP and the registration of
many other parties portends good omen. It promises to usher in the year 2018 as
a year of great expectations: one, that Nigeria would not drift into a one
party state, two, that there would be one or two strong parties that would pose
the challenge from opposition perspectives to the ruling party and keep it on
its toes.
For now, the ordinary mortals like us do not
need any visit to the clairvoyants or resort to the use of the occult to know
that the presidential fight in 2019 will be a straight fight between the APC
and the PDP with a slight tweaking in the cast of characters. PDP has no
Goodluck Jonathan to parade and it is not certain for now, who will have the
good luck to carry its flag. But there is no such cloud of uncertainty over the
APC.
APC’s Muhammadu Buhari, the incumbent
president, is now 75 years old. Despite the buffeting of a recent ill-health,
followed mercifully by a miraculous recovery, the man has remained his ramrod
self, fit as fiddle with this glowing look of healthiness all around him. As
they say, he is good to go and I don’t think the APC will, in clear conscience,
be willing to change a winning horse. So Buhari is.
Whoever emerges as PDP’s flag bearer, be it
the aforementioned Atiku Abubakar, or Sule Lamido or Ahmed Makarfi, or Ibrahim
Shekarau or, for that matter, some dark horse yet to show his face, the contest
promises to be the kind of fight that the inimitable Fela Anikulapo Kuti
once described as roforofo fight.
The 16 years that PDP was in power can be
likened to the plague of the locusts. President Buhari’s fight against
corruption, one of the three cardinal programmes of his administration, has
uncovered monumental fraud on the part of the PDP run government. APC has this
in its armoury – a potent weapon to deploy in political war time. In fact,
some professional political assassins are already warming up in the social
media with ugly facts and figures detailing when, where and how they
happen – the arms bazaar for instance and the
soulless acquisition of the Diezani Alison-Madueke property armada
just to mention but a few examples.
The prospective voters, who witnessed the
efficacy of the looting machine at work over the years under review, will have
the added value of being further entertained by the counter –factual narrative
of what went wrong, how it could have gotten worse if the old order, presided
over by Jonathan, had continued with the remorseless squandering of the
commonwealth. Have you forgotten the dire intelligence warning by the American
doomsayers which claimed that Nigeria
would disintegrate in 2015? Precisely that, according to the change narrative
of the APC strategists, was the apocalypse that the Buhari mission in politics
had changed during the election – halting the perilous drift into anarchy and
doom.
But nobody should be under any illusion
that the PDP, veterans of grim battles and dirty wars, would be so plagued by
guilt that they would just surrender and allow themselves to be overrun by the
enemy they now know very well. That is a warning that the APC must be prepared
to take as much as they give in the high end battle for the votes of the
people.
It is not difficult to imagine the attack line
of the PDP. Even at the most mournful time when the party was going
through its near death experience, torn by factional disputes between one time
chairman, Ali Modu Sherrif and his traducers, some members of the party,
irrespective of their faction, felt bitter enough to gallantly put up
some tepid fight against the APC government’s unremitting onslaught.
Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose, the enfent terrible of modern day
politics and the architect of stomach infrastructure, never let a day pass
without throwing some tantrums at the Buhari government or the President
himself. President Buhari’s fight against corruption, he proclaimed, was
discriminatory, one-sided and self-serving. At other times, the war against the
Boko Haram insurgents was unwinnable because of the method the Buhari regime
had adopted.
He was not alone. Femi Fani Kayode, in his
usually acerbic style, deployed all the arsenals he had in the Fani Kayode
lexicon to write off the APC administration as if the party and its government
were totally incapable of anything fundamentally inspiring. At best the two
were noted more for crudity than for finesse and sophistication in their
polemics and the engagement in diatribe. The two of them succeeded, in no
small measure, in promoting the rise of political lying.
But what the president and his handlers have to worry about most as we
get closer to these days of drama and political fireworks would be the perceived
inability or perhaps the unwillingness of the president to walk the talk
where and when it matters most. For instance, the issue of corruption is
uppermost on his mind and it is therefore very high on his agenda. But when
allegations of corrupt practices are levelled against those who are close to
him and who should be above board, there is evident dithering and
clumsiness in handling it as if to suggest, even if falsely, that he is
treating such people with kid gloves. On such occasions, Senator Shehu Sani
said the president was given to using deodorants to fight the corruption that
is close home and detergents for those not so close.
I remember that many Nigerians clapped for
President Buhari when he vowed that he would not allow any corrupt Nigerian to
use the proceeds of corruption to buy his way into public office. A vow
implemented more in breach than in observance. Perhaps unknown to him
many such people must have found their way to such high public offices despite
numerous question marks on their character and integrity.
Even if the APC wishes to query the moral
right of the PDP to point any accusing finger at the government when it comes
to issues of morality, the less than inspiring governance style of
the administration, issues of probity and accountability, nobody, at least not
the onlookers, would side with the APC when they call to mind the tardiness
with which the Abdulrasheed Maina scandal has been handled so far and the less
than serious manner the government has handled the herdsmen rampage in the
country, a sad phenomenon that is threatening to replace Boko Haram as the most
serious security problem in the country today.
No comments:
Post a Comment