By Owei Lakemfa
I bought two products of the Coca Cola conglomerate three days ago. They are bottles of Fanta and Sprite. I looked for a warning on them which should read that the drinks are poisonous when taken with Vitamin C. This would be in accordance with the March 2017 judgment of the Lagos High Court which found the products unfit for human consumption as they contain high levels of sunset yellow and benzoic acid which according to European and American drug agencies, can form the carcinogen benzene when combined with ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). The court had ordered Coca Cola to comply not later than June 2017.
I bought two products of the Coca Cola conglomerate three days ago. They are bottles of Fanta and Sprite. I looked for a warning on them which should read that the drinks are poisonous when taken with Vitamin C. This would be in accordance with the March 2017 judgment of the Lagos High Court which found the products unfit for human consumption as they contain high levels of sunset yellow and benzoic acid which according to European and American drug agencies, can form the carcinogen benzene when combined with ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). The court had ordered Coca Cola to comply not later than June 2017.
But I did
not see such warning. I did not expect to see the warning because as
expected, Coca Cola would be hiding behind technicalities
and a claim that it is appealing the judgment. However,
if it were interested in the health of Nigerians and not just
profits, the company by now, would have
saturated us with adverts warning of the dangers of taking their
products as ordered by the court. In a matter affecting lives such as this, the
company should comply with the judgment even if it seeks a reversal in the
higher court. This is basically because while it can recoup losses, it cannot
bring back lives that might be lost as a result of its non-compliance.
Given
its angry reaction, I am not sure Coca Cola will
obey the judgment. Rather, I expect it to assemble
an armada of Senior Advocates of Nigeria to appeal the
pro-life judgment and sink it with nuclear weapons. A lot
will depend on whether the appellate courts will stand firm
and deliver justice like Justice Adedayo
Oyebanji did, or, take cover under a mountain of technicalities
to shoot down the judgment. If the courts were to uphold the judgment, it is unlikely a transnational corporation like Coca Cola, given its
contemptuous defence in court, would willing comply.
Yet there
is need for haste as the revelation that these products are unfit for human
consumption had been made one decade ago. Who knows how many
Nigerians have ignorantly continued to take these products with something as
common and popular as vitamin C? How many have been exposed to the
health risks or have developed health complications taking
these drinks?
The
revelations about Fanta and Sprite began in March 2007 when the United Kingdom confiscated
and destroyed large quantities of the products imported by Nigerian
businessman, Dr. Emmanuel Fijabi Adebo. Tests carried out on the products
by the Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’s Trading Standard, Department of
Environment and Economy Directorate and corroborated by
the other European agencies showed they could be dangerous.
But Coca
Cola while accepting that it produced the destroyed items argued that they were
produced for distribution and consumption in Nigeria alone and not for export.
So the export was illegal as the UK has its own different Coca Cola
franchise. The company arrogantly and contemptuously argued that the
levels of chemical components which are dangerous by European
standards, are safe for Nigerians. An obviously miffed, Justice
Oyebanji said: “It is imperative to state that the knowledge of the Nigeria
Bottling Company (producers of Coca Cola in Nigeria) that the
products were to be exported is immaterial to its being fit for human consumption…soft
drinks manufactured by the Nigeria Bottling Company ought to be fit for human
consumption irrespective of colour or creed.”
In
agreeing with the learned judge, does it not make commonsense that as a
transnational corporation, if Coca Cola is changing its formula, it should do
so for all countries and not give underdeveloped countries a formula that can
be carcinogenic or injurious? Why would it use an outdated formula in
Africa and an updated one in Europe ?
Since Coca
Cola has declined to warn Nigerians about its products as it
obviously puts profit above all other considerations, the National
Agency For Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) which is a
government agency has no excuse not to have commenced a mass
enlightenment on the harmful effects of Fanta and Sprite. It is tragic
that NAFDAC which is publicly funded to protect Nigerians,
was unable to put up a defence in court for its certification of the
products.
The
courageous Justice Oyebanji in her well- considered judgment had declared that:
“It is manifest that NAFDAC has been grossly irresponsible in its regulatory
duties to the consumers of Fanta and Sprite manufactured by Nigeria Bottling
Company. In my respective view, NAFDAC has failed the citizens of this great
nation by its certification as satisfactory for human consumption products,
which in the United Kingdom failed sample test for human consumption, and which
become poisonous in the presence of Ascorbic Acid ordinarily known as Vitamin
C, which can be freely taken by the unsuspecting public with the company’s
Fanta or Sprite ”
Justice
Oyebanji was very clear and unambiguous in her judgment when she
ruled further that: “The court, in the light of the damning evidence
before it showing that NAFDAC has failed to live up to expectation, cannot
close its eyes to the grievous implication of allowing the status quo to
continue as it is. For the reasons herein adumbrated in this judgment, the
court hereby orders as follows: That NAFDAC shall forthwith mandate Nigeria
Bottling Company to, within 90 days hereof, include on all the
bottles of Fanta and Sprite soft drinks manufactured by the company, a written
warning that the content of the said bottles of Fanta and Sprite soft drinks
cannot be taken with Vitamin C as same becomes poisonous if taken with Vitamin
C.”
If this
judgment were delivered in countries where the health of the
citizenry, and public office is taken serious, the Director General
of NAFDAC would have publicly apologized and resigned. But in this case, even
after the judgment, NAFDAC is still making a case for Coca Cola and
justifying its sale of the products.
There is
also the Consumer Protection Council (CPC) another public agency which should
have moved speedily to begin mass public enlightenment.
Rather, it takes shelter behind claims that it is ‘investigating” the matter.
How long will it investigate? The CPC has not told the country it has the
laboratories to conduct research into Fanta and
Sprite. In any case what investigation does it require when all it
needs to do is get copies of the scientific evidence produced in court and act
in the higher interests of consumers.
The
wellbeing of Nigerians is in our hands, we have a duty to protect our lives and
those of our children. If we will it, we can make companies, no matter how
powerful to comply with international standards especially on food, drinks and
drugs.
*Owei Lakemfa is a Nigerian public affairs analyst
RELATED
POST
How
Safe Are Instant Noodles?
No comments:
Post a Comment